• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化使用可必特雾化吸入器的患者对与患者满意度和偏好调查问卷项目相对应的吸入器属性的重要性。

Quantifying the importance of inhaler attributes corresponding to items in the patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire in patients using Combivent Respimat.

作者信息

Davis Kimberly H, Su Jun, González Juan Marcos, Trudeau Jeremiah J, Nelson Lauren M, Hauber Brett, Hollis Kelly A

机构信息

RTI Health Solutions, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Post Office Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709-2194, UK.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, AOB 1C180, Ridgefield, CT, 06877, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 16;15(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0780-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0780-z
PMID:29037248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5644105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians consider ease of use, satisfaction, and preferences when prescribing an inhaler device. These factors may impact appropriate usage and compliance.

METHODS

The objectives were to quantify the relative importance of inhaler attributes in patients currently using Combivent Respimat by eliciting preferences for performance and convenience attributes assessed by items in the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ). Using a pharmacy database, 19,964 adults in the United States who filled ≥2 Combivent Respimat prescriptions were identified. Of those, 8150 patients were randomly selected to receive invitation letters. The online cross-sectional survey included the PASAPQ and best-worst scaling (BWS) questions. The PASAPQ measures satisfaction with medication attributes across two domains: performance and convenience. BWS questions asked participants to select the most and least important device attributes. A descriptive statistics analysis of the PASAPQ and a random-parameters logit model of BWS responses were conducted.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 503 participants. Most were female (57.3%), white (88.5%), and 51-70 years old (67.6%). Approximately 47% reported a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis, 21.9% asthma, 8.2% other lung disease, and 23.1% more than one lung disease. PASAPQ scores indicated that the majority were satisfied or very satisfied; up to 20% reported being dissatisfied with Combivent Respimat. The three most important inhaler attributes were Feeling that your medicine gets into your lungs, Inhaler works reliably, and Inhaler makes inhaling your medicine easy. The most important attributes corresponded to six of seven items in the PASAPQ performance domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Most participants reported satisfaction with Combivent Respimat. Performance attributes were more important than convenience attributes.

摘要

背景

医生在开具吸入器装置处方时会考虑其易用性、满意度和偏好。这些因素可能会影响正确使用和依从性。

方法

目标是通过引发患者对《患者满意度和偏好问卷》(PASAPQ)中所评估的性能和便利性属性的偏好,来量化吸入器属性在当前使用可必特雾化吸入器的患者中的相对重要性。利用药房数据库,在美国确定了19964名开具≥2份可必特雾化吸入器处方的成年人。其中,随机选择了8150名患者接收邀请函。在线横断面调查包括PASAPQ和最佳-最差尺度(BWS)问题。PASAPQ在两个领域衡量对药物属性的满意度:性能和便利性。BWS问题要求参与者选择最重要和最不重要的装置属性。对PASAPQ进行描述性统计分析,并对BWS回答进行随机参数logit模型分析。

结果

503名参与者完成了调查。大多数为女性(57.3%)、白人(88.5%),年龄在51 - 70岁之间(67.6%)。约47%报告患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病,21.9%患有哮喘,8.2%患有其他肺部疾病,23.1%患有不止一种肺部疾病。PASAPQ评分表明,大多数人满意或非常满意;高达20%的人报告对可必特雾化吸入器不满意。三个最重要的吸入器属性是感觉药物进入肺部、吸入器可靠工作以及吸入器使吸入药物容易。最重要的属性对应于PASAPQ性能领域七个项目中的六个。

结论

大多数参与者报告对可必特雾化吸入器满意。性能属性比便利性属性更重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/32598687817d/12955_2017_780_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/8243899f3b08/12955_2017_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/df3d50250add/12955_2017_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/7376799b4c64/12955_2017_780_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/32598687817d/12955_2017_780_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/8243899f3b08/12955_2017_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/df3d50250add/12955_2017_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/7376799b4c64/12955_2017_780_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a8/5644105/32598687817d/12955_2017_780_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the importance of inhaler attributes corresponding to items in the patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire in patients using Combivent Respimat.量化使用可必特雾化吸入器的患者对与患者满意度和偏好调查问卷项目相对应的吸入器属性的重要性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 16;15(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0780-z.
2
A cross-sectional study to assess inhalation device handling and patient satisfaction in COPD.一项评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入装置使用情况及患者满意度的横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Feb 26;11:407-15. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S91118. eCollection 2016.
3
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care.维持性吸入器偏好、属性重要性以及哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD重叠综合征患者及开具处方的医生在接受常规护理咨询时的满意度。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 16;13:927-936. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154525. eCollection 2018.
4
Asthma patients prefer Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler to Turbuhaler.哮喘患者更喜欢 Respimat Soft Mist 吸入器而不是 Turbuhaler。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:225-32. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3452. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
5
Improving usability and maintaining performance: human-factor and aerosol-performance studies evaluating the new reusable Respimat inhaler.提高可用性并保持性能:评估新型可重复使用的Respimat吸入器的人为因素和气溶胶性能研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Mar 5;14:509-523. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S190639. eCollection 2019.
6
COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study.舒利迭®(沙美特罗替卡松干粉吸入剂)与信必可都保®(布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效与安全性比较:一项随机、对照研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139-50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S38577. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
Development and validation of a patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire for inhalation devices.吸入装置患者满意度及偏好调查问卷的研制与验证
Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(1):41-52. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200504010-00005.
8
Inhaler devices for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from patients and healthcare practitioners.慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入装置:来自患者和医疗从业者的见解
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Jun;28(3):219-28. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2014.1142. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
9
Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler and Respimat inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - INHALATOR study.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对 Breezhaler 和 Respimat 吸入器的偏好、满意度和正确使用情况 - INHALATOR 研究。
Respir Med. 2018 Nov;144:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Factors associated with appropriate inhaler use in patients with COPD - lessons from the REAL survey.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者正确使用吸入器的相关因素——来自真实调查的经验教训
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 26;13:695-702. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S149404. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Success of Tiotropium/Olodaterol, Measured Using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), in Routine Clinical Practice: A Multinational Non-Interventional Study.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗治疗的疗效评估:使用临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷(CCQ)在常规临床实践中的评估:一项多国家非干预性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Mar 10;16:615-628. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S291920. eCollection 2021.
2
Inhaler device feature preferences among patients with obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阻塞性肺疾病患者对吸入装置特性的偏好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020718.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Relative importance of benefits and risks associated with antithrombotic therapies for acute coronary syndrome: patient and physician perspectives.急性冠状动脉综合征抗血栓治疗相关获益与风险的相对重要性:患者及医生视角
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1733-41. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.921611. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
2
Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer's disease in the United States and Germany.了解在美国和德国维持阿尔茨海默病患者功能能力的相对重要性。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1813-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0620-5. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
3
COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study.
The Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler: Implications of Drug Delivery Characteristics for Patients.
瑞普米特软雾吸入器:药物输送特性对患者的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00835-z.
4
Assessment of physical functioning and handling of tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat in patients with COPD in a real-world clinical setting.在真实临床环境下评估 COPD 患者使用噻托溴铵/奥达特罗 Respimat 的身体机能和操作情况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jul 4;14:1441-1453. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S195852. eCollection 2019.
5
Continued Innovation in Respiratory Care: The Importance of Inhaler Devices.呼吸护理领域的持续创新:吸入器装置的重要性。
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Apr;81(2):91-98. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0119.
舒利迭®(沙美特罗替卡松干粉吸入剂)与信必可都保®(布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效与安全性比较:一项随机、对照研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139-50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S38577. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
4
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
5
Patient preferences and linear scoring rules for patient-reported outcomes.患者报告结局的患者偏好和线性评分规则。
Patient. 2010 Dec 1;3(4):217-27. doi: 10.2165/11537880-000000000-00000.
6
A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence.一项探索治疗满意度与依从性、顺应性和持续性之间联系的文献综述。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:39-48. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S24752. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
7
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling.重视公民和患者的健康偏好:三种类型最佳最差量表法的最新进展。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):259-67. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.29.
9
Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis.使用联合分析估计 IWQOL-Lite 的重要性权重。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Jun;19(5):701-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9621-9. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
10
Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat Soft Mist inhaler.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对吸入器装置的偏好:Respimat Soft Mist 吸入器的使用经验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:381-90. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3391. Epub 2009 Oct 19.