Faigle Roland, Ziai Wendy C, Urrutia Victor C, Cooper Lisa A, Gottesman Rebecca F
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2046-2054. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002762.
Racial/ethnic differences in palliative care resource use after stroke have been recognized, but it is unclear whether patient or hospital characteristics drive this disparity. We sought to determine whether palliative care use after intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke differs between hospitals serving varying proportions of minority patients.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
Inpatient hospital admissions from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2011.
A total of 46,735 intracerebral hemorrhage and 331,521 ischemic stroke cases.
Palliative care use.
Intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke admissions were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2011. Hospitals were categorized based on the percentage of ethnic minority stroke patients (< 25% minorities ["white hospitals"], 25-50% minorities ["mixed hospitals"], or > 50% minorities ["minority hospitals"]). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and palliative care use within and between the different hospital strata. Stroke patients receiving care in minority hospitals had lower odds of palliative care compared with those treated in white hospitals, regardless of individual patient race/ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84 for intracerebral hemorrhage and odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77 for ischemic stroke). Ethnic minorities had a lower likelihood of receiving palliative care compared with whites in any hospital stratum, but the odds of palliative care for both white and minority intracerebral hemorrhage patients was lower in minority compared with white hospitals (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87 for white and odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88 for minority patients). Similar results were observed in ischemic stroke.
The odds of receiving palliative care for both white and minority stroke patients is lower in minority compared with white hospitals, suggesting system-level factors as a major contributor to explain race disparities in palliative care use after stroke.
卒中后姑息治疗资源使用方面的种族/民族差异已得到认可,但尚不清楚是患者特征还是医院特征导致了这种差异。我们试图确定在服务不同比例少数族裔患者的医院中,脑出血和缺血性卒中后姑息治疗的使用情况是否存在差异。
基于人群的横断面研究。
2007年至2011年全国住院患者样本中的住院患者入院情况。
总共46735例脑出血病例和331521例缺血性卒中病例。
姑息治疗的使用。
从2007年至2011年的全国住院患者样本中识别出脑出血和缺血性卒中入院病例。根据少数族裔卒中患者的百分比对医院进行分类(少数族裔患者比例<25% ["白人医院"]、25%-50% ["混合医院"] 或>50% ["少数族裔医院"])。使用逻辑回归评估不同医院分层内和分层之间种族/民族与姑息治疗使用之间的关联。在少数族裔医院接受治疗的卒中患者接受姑息治疗的几率低于在白人医院接受治疗的患者,无论患者个体的种族/民族如何(调整后的优势比,脑出血为0.65;95%置信区间,0.50 - 0.84;缺血性卒中的优势比为0.62;95%置信区间,0.50 - 0.77)。在任何医院分层中,少数族裔接受姑息治疗的可能性均低于白人,但与白人医院相比,少数族裔医院中白人和少数族裔脑出血患者接受姑息治疗的几率均较低(白人的优势比,0.66;95%置信区间,0.50 - 0.87;少数族裔患者的优势比,0.64;95%置信区间,0.46 - 0.88)。缺血性卒中也观察到类似结果。
与白人医院相比,少数族裔医院中白人和少数族裔卒中患者接受姑息治疗的几率均较低,这表明系统层面的因素是解释卒中后姑息治疗使用中种族差异的主要因素。