Whewell P, Ryman A, Bonanno D, Heather N
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, Regional Department of Psychotherapy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Br J Med Psychol. 2000 Dec;73(4):483-94. doi: 10.1348/000711200160679.
The aim of the paper is to explore whether the division of borderline personality disorder, as described in the DSM classification, into impulsive and borderline subtypes of emotionally unstable personality disorder in the ICD classification of personality disorder, is a valid division. The self-report questionnaire responses of 288 referrals to a personality disorder service were rated on each of the eight criteria for DSM-III-R diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. Factor analysis identified two factors; factor one closely corresponds with the borderline subtype of ICD10, whilst factor two closely corresponds with the impulsive subtype of ICD10. Criteria common to both factors unstable relationships and identity confusion - were considered core features of borderline personality disorder. The pattern of occurrence of the two factors was similar to the complex binary picture described by ICD10. However there were also differences. Firstly, identity confusion is found to be a core feature of both our factors, and this does not conform to the restriction of identity confusion to the borderline subtypes in ICD10. Secondly, we found a residual pool of undifferentiated borderline patients and a small group of pure non-impulsive borderline patients who are not currently accommodated within the ICD10 emotionally unstable personality disorder. We conclude that future classifications of this disorder should accommodate four subtypes, and suggest these subtypes have implications for treatment and further research.
本文的目的是探讨将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)分类中描述的边缘型人格障碍,在国际疾病分类(ICD)的人格障碍分类中分为冲动型和边缘型情绪不稳定人格障碍亚型,是否是一种有效的分类。对288名转介至人格障碍服务机构的患者的自我报告问卷回答,依据DSM-III-R边缘型人格障碍诊断的八项标准中的每一项进行评分。因子分析确定了两个因子;因子一与ICD10的边缘型亚型密切对应,而因子二与ICD10的冲动型亚型密切对应。两个因子共有的标准——关系不稳定和身份认同混乱——被视为边缘型人格障碍的核心特征。这两个因子的出现模式与ICD10所描述的复杂二元图景相似。然而也存在差异。首先,身份认同混乱被发现是我们两个因子的核心特征,这与ICD10中身份认同混乱仅限于边缘型亚型的限制不符。其次,我们发现了一组未分化的边缘型患者以及一小群纯粹的非冲动型边缘型患者,他们目前未被纳入ICD10的情绪不稳定人格障碍分类中。我们得出结论,该障碍未来的分类应包含四种亚型,并表明这些亚型对治疗和进一步研究具有启示意义。