• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度古吉拉特邦奇兰杰维约哈纳计划(Chiranjeevi Yojana)的私营合作伙伴特征——促进机构分娩的公私合作伙伴关系——对全民健康覆盖的启示。

Characteristics of private partners in Chiranjeevi Yojana, a public-private-partnership to promote institutional births in Gujarat, India - Lessons for universal health coverage.

机构信息

Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0185739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185739. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185739
PMID:29040336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5644975/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chiranjeevi Yojana (CY) is a Public-Private-Partnership between the state and private obstetricians in Gujarat, India, since 2007. The state pays for institutional births of the most vulnerable households (below-poverty-line and tribal) in private hospitals. An innovative remuneration package has been designed to disincentivise unnecessary cesareans. This study examines characteristics of private facilities which participated in the program.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all facilities which had conducted any births between June 2012 and April 2013 in three districts. We identified 111 private and 47 public facilities. Ninety of the 111 private facilities did caesarean sections in the last three months and were eligible to participate in the CY program. Of these, 40 (44%) participated in the CY program. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses followed by a Poisson regression model to estimate prevalence ratios of facility characteristics that predicted participation.

RESULTS

We found that facilities participating in the CY program had a significantly higher likelihood of being general facilities (PR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9), or conducting lower proportion of cesarean births (PR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.5) or having obstetricians new in private practice (PR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1) or being less expensive (PR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0). But none of these factors retained significance in a multi variable model.

CONCLUSION

Private obstetricians who participate in the CY program tend to be new to private practice, provide general services, conduct fewer caesareans and are also less expensive. This is advantageous to the PPP and widens the target beneficiary groups that can be serviced by the PPP. The state should design remuneration packages with the aim of attracting relatively new obstetricians to set up practices in more remote areas. It is possible that the CY remuneration package design is effective in keeping caesarean rates in check, and needs to be studied further.

摘要

背景

Chiranjeevi Yojana(CY)是印度古吉拉特邦自 2007 年以来实行的公私合作伙伴关系,由国家和私人产科医生共同参与。该计划由国家为最弱势群体(贫困线以下和部落)在私人医院的分娩提供费用。该计划设计了一个创新的薪酬方案,以抑制不必要的剖宫产。本研究旨在分析参与该计划的私立医疗机构的特征。

方法

我们对 2012 年 6 月至 2013 年 4 月期间在三个地区进行过任何分娩的所有医疗机构进行了横断面调查。我们共识别出 111 家私立医院和 47 家公立医院。在这 111 家私立医院中,有 90 家在过去三个月进行了剖宫产手术,有资格参与 CY 计划。其中 40 家(44%)参与了 CY 计划。我们进行了描述性和双变量分析,然后进行泊松回归模型,以估计预测参与的医疗机构特征的患病率比。

结果

我们发现,参与 CY 计划的医疗机构更有可能是综合性医疗机构(PR 1.9,95%CI 1.3-2.9),或剖宫产比例较低(PR 2.1,95%CI 1.2-3.5),或产科医生新开业(PR 1.9,95%CI 1.2-3.1),或价格较低(PR 1.8,95%CI 1.1-3.0)。但这些因素在多变量模型中均无统计学意义。

结论

参与 CY 计划的私立产科医生往往是新开业的,提供综合服务,剖宫产率较低,而且价格较低。这对公私合作伙伴关系是有利的,并扩大了可以由公私合作伙伴关系服务的目标受益人群。国家应设计薪酬方案,旨在吸引相对较新的产科医生在较偏远地区开展业务。CY 薪酬方案的设计可能有效控制剖宫产率,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5239/5644975/7d26d8fb58d0/pone.0185739.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5239/5644975/7d26d8fb58d0/pone.0185739.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5239/5644975/7d26d8fb58d0/pone.0185739.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of private partners in Chiranjeevi Yojana, a public-private-partnership to promote institutional births in Gujarat, India - Lessons for universal health coverage.印度古吉拉特邦奇兰杰维约哈纳计划(Chiranjeevi Yojana)的私营合作伙伴特征——促进机构分娩的公私合作伙伴关系——对全民健康覆盖的启示。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0185739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185739. eCollection 2017.
2
Utilization of the state led public private partnership program "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India: a cross sectional community based study.利用印度古吉拉特邦政府主导的公私合营项目“奇拉尼维计划”促进机构分娩:一项基于社区的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 15;16:266. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1510-7.
3
The state-led large scale public private partnership 'Chiranjeevi Program' to increase access to institutional delivery among poor women in Gujarat, India: How has it done? What can we learn?印度古吉拉特邦由政府主导的大规模公私合营项目“奇拉尼维计划”,旨在增加贫困妇女获得机构分娩服务的机会:该计划成效如何?我们能从中获得什么经验?
PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e95704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095704. eCollection 2014.
4
Considerations of private sector obstetricians on participation in the state led "Chiranjeevi Yojana" scheme to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: a qualitative study.印度古吉拉特邦私立部门产科医生对参与由国家主导的“奇兰吉维计划”以促进机构分娩的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 5;14:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-352.
5
Effect of previous utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure on subsequent utilization of a state led public-private partnership scheme "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India.先前的使用情况和自付费用对印度古吉拉特邦一项旨在促进机构分娩的公私合营计划“奇兰吉维计划”后续使用情况的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 25;17(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2256-6.
6
Statewide program to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: who participates and the degree of financial subsidy provided by the Chiranjeevi Yojana program.印度古吉拉特邦促进机构分娩的全州计划:谁参与以及奇兰吉维计划提供的财政补贴程度。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Jan 27;35:2. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0039-z.
7
Caesarean sections in the in the context of the Chiranjeevi Yojana public private partnership program to promote institutional birth in Gujarat, India; does the embedded disincentive for caesarean section work?在印度古吉拉特邦奇拉杰维尤贾纳公私合作伙伴关系计划背景下的剖宫产术;其中对剖宫产术的隐性抑制是否起作用?
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 24;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0922-5.
8
Effect of Chiranjeevi Yojana on institutional deliveries and neonatal and maternal outcomes in Gujarat, India: a difference-in-differences analysis.印度古吉拉特邦奇拉杰维计划对机构分娩以及新生儿和孕产妇结局的影响:一项双重差分分析
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Mar 1;92(3):187-94. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.124644. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Participation in the state led 'Janani Sahayogi Yojana' public private partnership program to promote facility births in Madhya Pradesh, India: views from private obstetrician partners.参与印度中央邦主导的公私合作“Janani Sahayogi Yojana”计划以促进设施分娩:私营产科医生合伙人的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 24;19(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4409-2.
10
Has Chiranjeevi Yojana changed the geographic availability of free comprehensive emergency obstetric care services in Gujarat, India?“奇拉吉维计划”是否改变了印度古吉拉特邦免费综合紧急产科护理服务的地理可及性?
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 6;8:28977. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28977. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Public-Private-Partnerships for Primary Care in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons on Pathways and Drivers.印度、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国初级保健领域的公私伙伴关系:关于途径和驱动因素的经验教训
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Sep;40(5):1167-1181. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3947. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Factors affecting private sector engagement in achieving universal health coverage: a scoping review.影响私营部门参与实现全民健康覆盖的因素:范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2375672. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2375672. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
3
Public-private partnership in primary health care: an experience from Iran.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability and provision of emergency obstetric care under a public-private partnership in three districts of Gujarat, India: lessons for Universal Health Coverage.印度古吉拉特邦三个地区公私合营模式下紧急产科护理的可及性与提供情况:全民健康覆盖的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Apr 13;1(1):e000019. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000019. eCollection 2016.
2
Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.超越过少、过晚、过多、过快:迈向全球循证且尊重的母婴照护之路。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2176-2192. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
3
初级卫生保健中的公私伙伴关系:来自伊朗的经验。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Jan 9;24:e5. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000561.
4
Hospital services under public-private partnerships, outcomes and, challenges: A literature review.公私合营模式下的医院服务、成果及挑战:文献综述
J Public Health Res. 2022 Aug 26;11(3):22799036221115781. doi: 10.1177/22799036221115781. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Perceptions of quality of care during birth at private Chiranjeevi facilities in Gujarat: lessons for Universal Health Coverage.古吉拉特邦奇拉杰维私立机构分娩护理质量认知:全民健康覆盖的经验教训
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(2):1850199. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1850199.
6
Private Health Sector in India-Ready and Willing, Yet Underutilized in the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.印度私营医疗行业——有准备且愿意,但在新冠疫情期间未得到充分利用:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;8:571419. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571419. eCollection 2020.
Family planning, antenatal and delivery care: cross-sectional survey evidence on levels of coverage and inequalities by public and private sector in 57 low- and middle-income countries.
计划生育、产前护理和分娩护理:57个低收入和中等收入国家公共部门和私营部门覆盖水平及不平等情况的横断面调查证据
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Apr;21(4):486-503. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12681. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
5
Urban health in India: many challenges, few solutions.印度的城市卫生:挑战众多,解决办法寥寥。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Dec;3(12):e729-30. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00210-7.
6
Has Chiranjeevi Yojana changed the geographic availability of free comprehensive emergency obstetric care services in Gujarat, India?“奇拉吉维计划”是否改变了印度古吉拉特邦免费综合紧急产科护理服务的地理可及性?
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 6;8:28977. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28977. eCollection 2015.
7
Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals.加速健康公平:全民健康覆盖在可持续发展目标中的关键作用。
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 29;13:101. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3.
8
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.南亚贫困社区私立和公立医疗机构剖宫产的患病率及影响因素:对孟加拉国、印度和尼泊尔数据的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982.
9
Considerations of private sector obstetricians on participation in the state led "Chiranjeevi Yojana" scheme to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: a qualitative study.印度古吉拉特邦私立部门产科医生对参与由国家主导的“奇兰吉维计划”以促进机构分娩的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 5;14:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-352.
10
Obstetric care and method of delivery in Mexico: results from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey.墨西哥的产科护理与分娩方式:2012年全国健康与营养调查结果
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):e104166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104166. eCollection 2014.