Suppr超能文献

南非德班超市和高端品牌颗粒狗粮中霉菌毒素污染情况的比较分析

A comparative analysis of mycotoxin contamination of supermarket and premium brand pelleted dog food in Durban, South Africa.

作者信息

Singh Sanil D, Chuturgoon Anil A

机构信息

Discipline of Medical Biochemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal.

出版信息

J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2017 Oct 6;88(0):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v88i0.1488.

Abstract

Dry pelleted dog food in the South African market is available via supermarkets, pet stores (standard brands [SBs]) and veterinary channels (premium brands [PBs]). For the purpose of this study, the supermarket channel included the cheaper quality foods and PBs were sold via the veterinary channel (n = 20). These feeds were analysed for four main mycotoxins (aflatoxins [AF], fumonisin [FB], ochratoxin A [OTA] and zearalenone [ZEA]) using standard welldescribed extraction, characterisation and quantitation processes. Irrespective of the brand or marketing channel, all foods were contaminated with fungi (mainly Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus parasiticus) and mycotoxins (most prevalent being aflatoxins and fumonisins). This was observed in all 20 samples irrespective of the marketing channel or perceived quality. Also, many samples within each marketing channel failed the 10 ppb limit for aflatoxin set by regulations in South Africa. Although fumonisin was detected in all samples, a single sample failed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limit of 100 ppb. Both OTA and ZEA were found at low concentrations and were absent in some samples. This study suggested that higher priced dog food does not ensure superior quality or that it is free from contamination with fungi or mycotoxins. However, analysis of the more expensive PBs did reveal contamination concentrations lower than those of the SBs.

摘要

南非市场上的干颗粒狗粮可通过超市、宠物店(标准品牌[SBs])和兽医渠道(优质品牌[PBs])购买。在本研究中,超市渠道包括质量较次的食品,优质品牌通过兽医渠道销售(n = 20)。使用标准的、详细描述的提取、鉴定和定量方法对这些饲料分析了四种主要霉菌毒素(黄曲霉毒素[AF]、伏马毒素[FB]、赭曲霉毒素A[OTA]和玉米赤霉烯酮[ZEA])。无论品牌或销售渠道如何,所有食品均被真菌(主要是黄曲霉、烟曲霉和寄生曲霉)和霉菌毒素污染(最常见的是黄曲霉毒素和伏马毒素)。在所有20个样品中均观察到这种情况,无论销售渠道或感知质量如何。此外,每个销售渠道内的许多样品都未达到南非法规规定的黄曲霉毒素10 ppb的限量。尽管在所有样品中均检测到伏马毒素,但有一个样品未达到美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)100 ppb的限量。OTA和ZEA的浓度均较低,且在一些样品中未检出。这项研究表明,价格较高的狗粮并不能确保质量上乘,也不能保证其不受真菌或霉菌毒素的污染。然而,对价格较高的优质品牌的分析确实显示其污染浓度低于标准品牌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebcb/6138162/95de48d4db62/JSAVA-88-1488-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验