Duncan Dustin T, Aldstadt Jared, Whalen John, White Kellee, Castro Marcia C, Williams David R
Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge Building 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY USA.
Demogr Res. 2012 Jan-Jun;26(17):409-448. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.17. Epub 2012 May 15.
Multiple and varied benefits have been suggested for increased neighborhood walkability. However, spatial inequalities in neighborhood walkability likely exist and may be attributable, in part, to residential segregation.
Utilizing a spatial demographic perspective, we evaluated potential spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities across census tracts in Boston, MA (US).
The independent variables included minority racial/ethnic population percentages and percent of families in poverty. Walkable neighborhood amenities were assessed with a composite measure. Spatial autocorrelation in key study variables were first calculated with the Global Moran's statistic. Then, Spearman correlations between neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and walkable neighborhood amenities were calculated as well as Spearman correlations accounting for spatial autocorrelation. We fit ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and spatial autoregressive models, when appropriate, as a final step.
Significant positive spatial autocorrelation was found in neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. census tract percent Black), but not walkable neighborhood amenities or in the OLS regression residuals. Spearman correlations between neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and walkable neighborhood amenities were not statistically significant, nor were neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics significantly associated with walkable neighborhood amenities in OLS regression models.
Our results suggest that there is residential segregation in Boston and that spatial inequalities do not necessarily show up using a composite measure.
Future research in other geographic areas (including international contexts) and using different definitions of neighborhoods (including small-area definitions) should evaluate if spatial inequalities are found using composite measures but also should use measures of specific neighborhood amenities.
已有研究表明,邻里步行便利性的提升具有多种益处。然而,邻里步行便利性方面可能存在空间不平等现象,这在一定程度上可能归因于居住隔离。
从空间人口统计学角度出发,我们评估了美国马萨诸塞州波士顿各普查区在适宜步行的邻里设施方面潜在的空间不平等情况。
自变量包括少数族裔人口百分比和贫困家庭百分比。通过综合指标评估适宜步行的邻里设施。首先使用全局莫兰指数统计量计算关键研究变量的空间自相关性。然后,计算邻里社会人口特征与适宜步行的邻里设施之间的斯皮尔曼相关性,以及考虑空间自相关性的斯皮尔曼相关性。最后,在适当情况下拟合普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归模型和空间自回归模型。
在邻里社会人口特征(如普查区黑人百分比)中发现了显著的正空间自相关性,但在适宜步行的邻里设施或OLS回归残差中未发现。邻里社会人口特征与适宜步行的邻里设施之间的斯皮尔曼相关性无统计学意义,在OLS回归模型中邻里社会人口特征与适宜步行的邻里设施也无显著关联。
我们的研究结果表明,波士顿存在居住隔离现象,并且使用综合指标不一定能显示出空间不平等。
未来在其他地理区域(包括国际背景)以及使用不同邻里定义(包括小区域定义)的研究,应评估使用综合指标时是否能发现空间不平等,同时也应使用特定邻里设施的指标。