• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混沌遗传算法和 Adaboost 集成元模型方法在急诊部门的最优资源规划中的应用。

Chaotic genetic algorithm and Adaboost ensemble metamodeling approach for optimum resource planning in emergency departments.

机构信息

Industrial & Transportation Engineering Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, 90035-190, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Artif Intell Med. 2018 Jan;84:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.10.002
PMID:29054572
Abstract

Long length of stay and overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) are two common problems in the healthcare industry. To decrease the average length of stay (ALOS) and tackle overcrowding, numerous resources, including the number of doctors, nurses and receptionists need to be adjusted, while a number of constraints are to be considered at the same time. In this study, an efficient method based on agent-based simulation, machine learning and the genetic algorithm (GA) is presented to determine optimum resource allocation in emergency departments. GA can effectively explore the entire domain of all 19 variables and identify the optimum resource allocation through evolution and mimicking the survival of the fittest concept. A chaotic mutation operator is used in this study to boost GA performance. A model of the system needs to be run several thousand times through the GA evolution process to evaluate each solution, hence the process is computationally expensive. To overcome this drawback, a robust metamodel is initially constructed based on an agent-based system simulation. The simulation exhibits ED performance with various resource allocations and trains the metamodel. The metamodel is created with an ensemble of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), feedforward neural network (FFNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) using the adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) ensemble algorithm. The proposed GA-based optimization approach is tested in a public ED, and it is shown to decrease the ALOS in this ED case study by 14%. Additionally, the proposed metamodel shows a 26.6% improvement compared to the average results of ANFIS, FFNN and RNN in terms of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

摘要

长住院时间和急诊科(ED)过度拥挤是医疗保健行业的两个常见问题。为了缩短平均住院时间(ALOS)并解决过度拥挤问题,需要调整包括医生、护士和接待员数量在内的大量资源,同时需要考虑许多限制因素。在这项研究中,提出了一种基于基于代理的仿真、机器学习和遗传算法(GA)的有效方法,用于确定急诊科的最佳资源分配。GA 可以有效地探索所有 19 个变量的整个领域,并通过进化和模拟适者生存的概念来识别最佳资源分配。在这项研究中,使用混沌突变算子来提高 GA 的性能。需要通过 GA 进化过程运行系统模型数千次来评估每个解决方案,因此该过程计算成本很高。为了克服这一缺点,最初基于基于代理的系统仿真构建了一个稳健的元模型。该仿真展示了具有各种资源分配的 ED 性能,并对元模型进行了训练。元模型是使用自适应神经模糊推理系统 (ANFIS)、前馈神经网络 (FFNN) 和递归神经网络 (RNN) 的集成使用自适应增强 (AdaBoost) 集成算法创建的。所提出的基于 GA 的优化方法在公共 ED 中进行了测试,结果表明在该 ED 案例研究中,ALOS 缩短了 14%。此外,与 ANFIS、FFNN 和 RNN 的平均结果相比,所提出的元模型在平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 方面显示出 26.6%的改进。

相似文献

1
Chaotic genetic algorithm and Adaboost ensemble metamodeling approach for optimum resource planning in emergency departments.混沌遗传算法和 Adaboost 集成元模型方法在急诊部门的最优资源规划中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2018 Jan;84:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
A universal deep learning approach for modeling the flow of patients under different severities.一种通用的深度学习方法,用于对不同严重程度的患者进行建模。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Feb;154:191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Emergency Department Capacity Planning: A Recurrent Neural Network and Simulation Approach.急诊科容量规划:一种递归神经网络和仿真方法。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Nov 15;2019:4359719. doi: 10.1155/2019/4359719. eCollection 2019.
4
Stochastic resource allocation in emergency departments with a multi-objective simulation optimization algorithm.基于多目标模拟优化算法的急诊科随机资源分配
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Mar;20(1):55-75. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9335-1. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
An emergency department simulation and a neural network metamodel.急诊科模拟与神经网络元模型。
J Soc Health Syst. 1997;5(3):63-79.
6
Managing low-acuity patients in an Emergency Department through simulation-based multiobjective optimization using a neural network metamodel.运用基于神经网络元模型的模拟多目标优化管理急诊科低危患者。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Sep;27(3):415-435. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09678-3. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
An intelligent algorithm for optimizing emergency department job and patient satisfaction.一种用于优化急诊科工作及患者满意度的智能算法。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Jun 11;31(5):374-390. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2016-0086.
8
Short and Long term predictions of Hospital emergency department attendances.医院急诊科就诊人次的短期和长期预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
An agent-based simulation combined with group decision-making technique for improving the performance of an emergency department.一种基于主体的模拟与群体决策技术相结合的方法,用于提高急诊科的绩效。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017 Mar 30;50(5):e5955. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20175955.
10
The emergency department prediction of disposition (EPOD) study.急诊科处置预测(EPOD)研究
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Nov;17(4):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in medicine: Current applications in cardiology, oncology, and radiology.医学中的人工智能:当前在心脏病学、肿瘤学和放射学中的应用。
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):106854. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106854.
2
Key performance indicators in emergency department simulation: a scoping review.急诊科模拟中的关键绩效指标:一项范围综述
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 30;33(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01318-7.
3
Managing low-acuity patients in an Emergency Department through simulation-based multiobjective optimization using a neural network metamodel.
运用基于神经网络元模型的模拟多目标优化管理急诊科低危患者。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Sep;27(3):415-435. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09678-3. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Machine Learning Reveals the Contribution of Lipoproteins to Liver Triglyceride Content and Inflammation.机器学习揭示脂蛋白对肝脏甘油三酯含量和炎症的作用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Dec 18;110(1):218-227. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae371.
5
Source Attribution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Estuarine Aquaculture: A Machine Learning Approach.河口养殖中抗生素抗性基因的来源归因:一种机器学习方法。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 22;13(1):107. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010107.
6
Artificial intelligence assisted acute patient journey.人工智能辅助的急性病患者就医流程
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Oct 4;5:962165. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.962165. eCollection 2022.
7
Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A scoping review.急诊医学中的人工智能:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Nov 7;1(6):1691-1702. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12277. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
2D Tsallis Entropy for Image Segmentation Based on Modified Chaotic Bat Algorithm.基于改进混沌蝙蝠算法的二维Tsallis熵图像分割
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Mar 30;20(4):239. doi: 10.3390/e20040239.
9
Introduction to Metamodeling for Reducing Computational Burden of Advanced Analyses with Health Economic Models: A Structured Overview of Metamodeling Methods in a 6-Step Application Process.简介:通过健康经济模型来降低高级分析的计算负担的元建模方法:在 6 步应用程序过程中对元建模方法的结构化概述。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):348-363. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20912233.
10
Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.人工智能与全球健康的未来。
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1579-1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30226-9.