University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ducom Instruments Europe BV, Center for Innovation, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec 15;84(1). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01516-17. Print 2018 Jan 1.
The viscoelasticity of a biofilm's EPS (extracellular polymeric substance) matrix conveys protection against mechanical challenges, but adaptive responses of biofilm inhabitants to produce EPS are not well known. Here, we compare the responses of a biofilm of an EPS-producing (ATCC 12600) and a non-EPS producing (5298) strain to fluid shear and mechanical challenge. Confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed absence of calcofluor-white-stainable EPS in biofilms of 5298. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy combined with tribometry indicated that polysaccharide production per bacterium in the initial adhering layer was higher during growth at high shear than at low shear and that this increased EPS production extended to entire biofilms, as indicated by tribometrically measured coefficients of friction (CoF). CoF of biofilms grown under high fluid shear were higher than those when grown under low shear, likely due to wash-off polysaccharides. Measurement of a biofilm's CoF implies application of mechanical pressure that yielded an immediate increase in the polysaccharide band area of ATCC 12600 biofilms due to their compression. Compression decreased after relief of pressure to the level observed prior to mechanical pressure. For biofilms grown under high shear, this coincided with a higher percent whiteness in optical coherence tomography-images indicative of water outflow, returning back into the biofilm during stress relaxation. Biofilms grown under low shear, however, were stimulated during tribometry to produce EPS, also after relief of stress. Knowledge of factors that govern EPS production and water flow in biofilms will allow better control of biofilms under mechanical challenge and better understanding of the barrier properties of biofilms against antimicrobial penetration. Adaptive responses of biofilm inhabitants in nature to environmental challenges such as fluid shear and mechanical pressure often involve EPS production with the aim of protecting biofilm inhabitants. EPS can assist biofilm bacteria in remaining attached or can impede antimicrobial penetration. The TriboChemist is a recently introduced instrument, allowing the study of initially adhering bacteria to a germanium crystal using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, while simultaneously allowing measurement of the coefficient of friction of a biofilm, which serves as an indicator of the EPS content of a biofilm. EPS production can be stimulated by both fluid shear during growth and mechanical pressure, while increased EPS production can continue after pressure relaxation of the biofilm. Since EPS is pivotal in the protection of biofilm inhabitants against mechanical and chemical challenges, knowledge of the factors that make biofilm inhabitants decide to produce EPS, as provided in this study, is important for the development of biofilm control measures.
生物膜 EPS(细胞外聚合物)基质的粘弹性为其提供了抵御机械挑战的保护,但生物膜居民产生 EPS 的适应性反应尚不清楚。在这里,我们比较了 EPS 产生(ATCC 12600)和非 EPS 产生(5298)菌株的生物膜对流体剪切和机械挑战的反应。共焦激光扫描显微镜证实 5298 生物膜中不存在钙荧光白可染 EPS。衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外(ATR-FTIR)光谱结合摩擦测量表明,在高剪切下生长时,初始附着层中每个细菌的多糖产量高于低剪切下的产量,并且这种增加的 EPS 产量扩展到整个生物膜,这可以通过摩擦测量的摩擦系数(CoF)来指示。在高流体剪切下生长的生物膜的 CoF 高于在低剪切下生长的 CoF,这可能是由于多糖被冲洗掉。生物膜 CoF 的测量意味着施加机械压力,这导致 ATCC 12600 生物膜的多糖带面积立即增加,因为它们被压缩。压力释放后,生物膜的压缩度会降低到机械压力之前的水平。对于在高剪切下生长的生物膜,这与光学相干断层扫描图像中的白色百分比增加相对应,表明水流出,并在应力松弛期间回流到生物膜中。然而,在低剪切下生长的生物膜在摩擦测量过程中受到刺激,以产生 EPS,即使在缓解压力后也是如此。了解控制生物膜中 EPS 产生和水流的因素将允许更好地控制机械挑战下的生物膜,并更好地理解生物膜对抗抗菌渗透的屏障特性。生物膜居民对环境挑战(如流体剪切和机械压力)的适应性反应通常涉及 EPS 的产生,目的是保护生物膜居民。EPS 可以帮助生物膜细菌保持附着,也可以阻碍抗菌渗透。TriboChemist 是一种最近引入的仪器,允许使用 ATR-FTIR 光谱研究附着在锗晶体上的初始附着细菌,同时允许测量生物膜的摩擦系数,该系数可作为生物膜 EPS 含量的指标。EPS 的产生可以通过生长过程中的流体剪切和机械压力来刺激,并且在生物膜的压力释放后,EPS 的产生可以继续。由于 EPS 是保护生物膜居民免受机械和化学挑战的关键因素,因此了解使生物膜居民决定产生 EPS 的因素(如本研究所示)对于开发生物膜控制措施非常重要。