University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on Hudson, Hoboken, New Jersey, United States.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jul 17;84(15). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01035-18. Print 2018 Aug 1.
The transmission of bacteria in biofilms from donor to receiver surfaces precedes the formation of biofilms in many applications. Biofilm transmission is different from bacterial adhesion, because it involves biofilm compression in between two surfaces, followed by a separation force leading to the detachment of the biofilm from the donor surface and subsequent adhesion to the receiver surface. Therewith, the transmission depends on a balance between donor and receiver surface properties and the cohesiveness of the biofilm itself. Here, we compare bacterial transmission from biofilms of an extracellular-polymeric-substance (EPS)-producing and a non-EPS-producing staphylococcal strain and a dual-species oral biofilm from smooth silicon (Si) donor surfaces to smooth and nanopillared Si receiver surfaces. Biofilms were fully covering the donor surface before transmission. However, after transmission, the biofilms only partly covered the donor and receiver surfaces regardless of nanopillaring, indicating bacterial transmission through adhesive failure at the interface between biofilms and donor surfaces as well as through cohesive failure in the biofilms. The numbers of bacteria per unit volume in EPS-producing staphylococcal biofilms before transmission were 2-fold smaller than in biofilms of the non-EPS-producing strain and of dual species. This difference increased after transmission in the biofilm left behind on the donor surfaces due to an increased bacterial density for the non-EPS-producing strain and a dual-species biofilm. This suggests that biofilms of the non-EPS-producing strain and dual species remained compressed after transmission, while biofilms of the EPS-producing strain were induced to produce more EPS during transmission and relaxed toward their initial state after transmission due to the viscoelasticity conferred to the biofilm by its EPS. Bacterial transmission from biofilm-covered surfaces to surfaces is mechanistically different from bacterial adhesion to surfaces and involves detachment from the donor and adhesion to the receiver surfaces under pressure. Bacterial transmission occurs, for instance, in food processing or packaging, in household situations, or between surfaces in hospitals. Patients admitted to a hospital room previously occupied by a patient with antibiotic-resistant pathogens are at elevated infection risk by the same pathogens through transmission. Nanopillared receiver surfaces did not collect less biofilm from a smooth donor than a smooth receiver, likely because the pressure applied during transmission negated the smaller contact area between bacteria and nanopillared surfaces, generally held responsible for reduced adhesion. Biofilm left behind on smooth donor surfaces of a non-extracellular-polymeric-substance (EPS)-producing strain and dual species had undergone different structural changes than an EPS-producing strain, which is important for their possible further treatment by antimicrobials or disinfectants.
在许多应用中,细菌从供体表面到受体表面的生物膜传播先于生物膜的形成。生物膜传播不同于细菌黏附,因为它涉及到两个表面之间的生物膜压缩,随后是分离力,导致生物膜从供体表面脱离并随后黏附到受体表面。因此,传播取决于供体和受体表面特性以及生物膜本身的内聚性之间的平衡。在这里,我们比较了产胞外聚合物(EPS)和不产 EPS 的葡萄球菌菌株的生物膜以及光滑硅(Si)供体表面到光滑和纳米柱 Si 受体表面的混合口腔生物膜的细菌传播。在传播之前,生物膜完全覆盖供体表面。然而,在传播后,生物膜只部分覆盖供体和受体表面,无论纳米柱化如何,这表明细菌通过生物膜和供体表面之间的界面处的黏附失效以及生物膜内的内聚失效而传播。在传播之前,产 EPS 的葡萄球菌生物膜中每单位体积的细菌数量比不产 EPS 的菌株和混合生物膜中的数量少 2 倍。由于非 EPS 产生菌株和混合生物膜的细菌密度增加,在供体表面上留下的生物膜中,这种差异在传播后增加。这表明,在传播后,非 EPS 产生菌株和混合生物膜的生物膜保持压缩状态,而 EPS 产生菌株的生物膜在传播过程中被诱导产生更多的 EPS,并由于其 EPS 赋予的粘弹性而在传播后向其初始状态松弛。从生物膜覆盖的表面到表面的细菌传播在机制上不同于细菌对表面的黏附,并且涉及到从供体表面的脱离和对受体表面的黏附以及在压力下的脱离。例如,在食品加工或包装、家庭环境或医院表面之间会发生细菌传播。通过传播,被安置在先前被抗生素耐药病原体患者占据的病房中的患者会面临相同病原体感染的风险增加。与光滑接收器相比,纳米柱接收器从光滑供体上收集的生物膜并没有少,这可能是因为在传播过程中施加的压力抵消了细菌与纳米柱表面之间较小的接触面积,这通常被认为是导致黏附减少的原因。非胞外聚合物(EPS)产生菌株和混合生物膜在光滑供体表面上留下的生物膜经历了与 EPS 产生菌株不同的结构变化,这对于它们可能通过抗生素或消毒剂进行进一步处理很重要。