• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Double-blind comparison of 3-day versus 7-day treatment with norfloxacin in symptomatic urinary tract infections. The Inter-Nordic Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(6):619-24. doi: 10.3109/00365548809035662.

DOI:10.3109/00365548809035662
PMID:2906171
Abstract

The therapeutic efficacy and safety of norfloxacin 400 mg twice daily for 3 or 7 days was compared in a double-blind randomized multiclinic study including 485 female general practice patients with uncomplicated symptomatic lower urinary tract infections. 373 patients were considered valid for efficacy, 193 in the 3-day treatment group and 180 in the 7-day treatment group. The short-term efficacy (elimination of significant bacteriuria 3-13 days post-treatment) was 93.8% and 96.6% in the 3 and 7-day treatment groups, respectively, and the accumulated efficacy (elimination of significant bacteriuria 3 days post-treatment up until 45 days after the first dose) 81.3% and 91.7%, respectively (p less than 0.004). The median time to disappearance of symptoms was 3 days in both groups. Norfloxacin was well tolerated in both treatment groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison of 3-day versus 7-day treatment with norfloxacin in symptomatic urinary tract infections. The Inter-Nordic Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(6):619-24. doi: 10.3109/00365548809035662.
2
Double-blind, randomized comparison of 24 weeks of norfloxacin and 12 weeks of norfloxacin followed by 12 weeks of placebo in the therapy of complicated urinary tract infection.诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染24周与诺氟沙星治疗12周后再用安慰剂治疗12周的双盲随机对照研究
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1292-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1292.
3
Fosfomycin trometamol in a single dose versus norfloxacin for seven days in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary infections in general practice.在普通医疗实践中,单剂量的磷霉素氨丁三醇与诺氟沙星治疗7天用于治疗单纯性泌尿系统感染的比较。
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 2:S80-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01643433.
4
Coordinated multicenter study of norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infections. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.
J Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;155(2):170-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.2.170.
5
Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 3 days of norfloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.单剂量环丙沙星与3天诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002 Jan;8(1):50-4.
6
Efficacy and safety of norfloxacin 800 mg once-daily versus norfloxacin 400 mg twice-daily in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.每日一次服用800毫克诺氟沙星与每日两次服用400毫克诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机临床试验。
J Chemother. 1998 Apr;10(2):122-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.1998.10.2.122.
7
Lomefloxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: three-day versus seven-day treatment. The South Swedish Lolex Study Group.洛美沙星与诺氟沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染:三日疗法与七日疗法。瑞典南部洛美沙星研究小组。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24(6):773-80. doi: 10.3109/00365549209062463.
8
Single-dose compared with 3-day norfloxacin treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Canadian Infectious Diseases Society Clinical Trials Study Group.单剂量与3日诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。加拿大传染病协会临床试验研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1233-7.
9
Comparative study of norfloxacin and trimethoprim for the treatment of elderly patients with urinary tract infection.
N Z Med J. 1988 Aug 24;101(852):537-9.
10
Efficacy of lomefloxacin as compared to norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in adults.洛美沙星与诺氟沙星治疗成人单纯性尿路感染的疗效比较。
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):75S-81S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90314-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic duration for treating uncomplicated, symptomatic lower urinary tract infections in elderly women.老年女性单纯性、有症状下尿路感染的抗生素治疗疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD001535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001535.pub2.
2
Quinolones for uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.喹诺酮类药物用于治疗女性单纯性急性膀胱炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003597.pub2.
3
[Therapy of the acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection].[急性单纯性尿路感染的治疗]
Urologe A. 2006 Apr;45(4):429-32, 434-5. doi: 10.1007/s00120-006-1022-x.
4
All dysuria is local. A cost-effectiveness model for designing site-specific management algorithms.所有排尿困难都是局部性的。一种用于设计特定部位管理算法的成本效益模型。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 1):433-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.10440.x.
5
[Urinary infections without complications: comparison of a treatment with norfloxacin for 7 days versus norfloxacin for 3 days].[无并发症的尿路感染:诺氟沙星7天疗法与3天疗法的比较]
Aten Primaria. 2002 Jan;29(1):62-3. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)70503-9.
6
Treatment of urinary tract infections in Dutch hospitals.荷兰医院中尿路感染的治疗
Infection. 1996 May-Jun;24(3):234-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01781099.
7
Randomised double-blind study of norfloxacin and cefadroxil in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.诺氟沙星与头孢羟氨苄治疗急性肾盂肾炎的随机双盲研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 May;9(5):317-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01973737.
8
Use of quinolones in treatment of prostatitis and lower urinary tract infections.喹诺酮类药物在前列腺炎和下尿路感染治疗中的应用。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Apr;10(4):342-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01967009.
9
Standards of therapy for urinary tract infections in adults.成人尿路感染的治疗标准。
Infection. 1992;20 Suppl 3:S164-70; discussion S175-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01704364.
10
Spectrum and susceptibility of pathogens causing acute uncomplicated lower UTI in females and its correlation to bacteriologic outcome after single dose therapy with fosfomycin trometamol versus ofloxacin/co-trimoxazole.女性急性单纯性下尿路感染病原体的谱型、药敏情况及其与磷霉素氨丁三醇单剂量治疗和氧氟沙星/复方新诺明治疗后细菌学结果的相关性
Infection. 1992;20 Suppl 4:S296-301. doi: 10.1007/BF01710018.