• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星与头孢羟氨苄治疗急性肾盂肾炎的随机双盲研究

Randomised double-blind study of norfloxacin and cefadroxil in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.

作者信息

Sandberg T, Englund G, Lincoln K, Nilsson L G

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Göteborg, Ostra Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 May;9(5):317-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01973737.

DOI:10.1007/BF01973737
PMID:2197091
Abstract

In a coordinated, double-blind multi-centre trial, adults with symptoms of acute pyelonephritis were randomly assigned to receive a two-week course of oral treatment with either 400 mg norfloxacin twice daily or 1 g cefadroxil twice daily. Of 197 patients enrolled in the study, 140 could be evaluated for drug efficacy and 193 for drug safety. Norfloxacin gave a significantly higher bacteriological cure rate than cefadroxil, both at 3 to 10 days (98% versus 65%; p less than 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference in proportions 21-46%) and up to eight weeks (87% versus 48%; p less than 0.0001; 95% CI 25-54%) after cessation of treatment. The differences between the two regimens were most pronounced in men and in patients with complicating factors such as diabetes mellitus and urinary tract abnormalities. The clinical response during treatment did not differ between the two groups, but symptomatic recurrences at follow-up were more common in the cefadroxil group (28% versus 3%; p less than 0.0001; 95% CI 14-36%). Adverse events were more often reported by patients receiving cefadroxil (39% versus 22%; p = 0.011; 95% CI 4-30%) and consisted mainly of gastrointestinal disturbances and vulvo-vaginitis. In terms of bacteriological and clinical efficacy and safety, a two-week course of norfloxacin was superior to a two-week course of cefadroxil for oral treatment of community-acquired acute pyelonephritis.

摘要

在一项协调的双盲多中心试验中,有急性肾盂肾炎症状的成年人被随机分配接受为期两周的口服治疗,一组为每日两次服用400毫克诺氟沙星,另一组为每日两次服用1克头孢羟氨苄。在197名参与研究的患者中,140名可评估药物疗效,193名可评估药物安全性。诺氟沙星的细菌学治愈率显著高于头孢羟氨苄,在治疗停止后3至10天(98%对65%;p<0.0001;比例差异的95%置信区间[CI]为21 - 46%)以及长达八周(87%对48%;p<0.0001;95%CI为25 - 54%)时均如此。两种治疗方案之间的差异在男性以及患有糖尿病和尿路异常等复杂因素的患者中最为明显。两组在治疗期间的临床反应无差异,但在随访中,头孢羟氨苄组的症状复发更为常见(28%对3%;p<0.0001;95%CI为14 - 36%)。接受头孢羟氨苄治疗的患者报告的不良事件更多(39%对22%;p = 0.011;95%CI为4 - 30%),主要包括胃肠道不适和外阴阴道炎。就细菌学和临床疗效及安全性而言,为期两周的诺氟沙星疗程在口服治疗社区获得性急性肾盂肾炎方面优于为期两周的头孢羟氨苄疗程。

相似文献

1
Randomised double-blind study of norfloxacin and cefadroxil in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.诺氟沙星与头孢羟氨苄治疗急性肾盂肾炎的随机双盲研究
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 May;9(5):317-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01973737.
2
Cefetamet pivoxil in acute pyelonephritis: an open study.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;12(1):43-50. doi: 10.1185/03007999009111490.
3
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor and norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated pyelonephritis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与头孢克洛及诺氟沙星治疗单纯性肾盂肾炎的比较
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):86S-94S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90614-h.
4
Ciprofloxacin for 7 days versus 14 days in women with acute pyelonephritis: a randomised, open-label and double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.急性肾盂肾炎女性患者应用环丙沙星 7 天与 14 天的随机、开放标签、双盲、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):484-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60608-4. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Fewer bacterial relapses after oral treatment with norfloxacin than with ceftibuten in acute pyelonephritis initially treated with intravenous cefuroxime.在最初采用静脉注射头孢呋辛治疗的急性肾盂肾炎患者中,口服诺氟沙星后的细菌复发率低于口服头孢布烯。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33(5):339-43. doi: 10.1080/003655401750173922.
6
[Current role of aminoglycosides in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis].[氨基糖苷类药物在急性肾盂肾炎治疗中的当前作用]
Prog Urol. 1998 Dec;8(6):1077-9.
7
Fosfomycin trometamol (Monuril) versus norfloxacin in single dose for adult female uncomplicated UTIs. Multicenter randomized, double-blind study.磷霉素氨丁三醇(蒙诺力)与诺氟沙星单剂量治疗成年女性单纯性尿路感染的多中心随机双盲研究。
Chemotherapy. 1990;36 Suppl 1:31-3. doi: 10.1159/000238813.
8
Double-blind comparison of 3-day versus 7-day treatment with norfloxacin in symptomatic urinary tract infections. The Inter-Nordic Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(6):619-24. doi: 10.3109/00365548809035662.
9
[Long-term Cefadroxil prophylaxis in children with recurrent urinary tract infections].[头孢羟氨苄对复发性尿路感染儿童的长期预防作用]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2003;39 Suppl 1:59-63.
10
Double-blind, randomized comparison of 24 weeks of norfloxacin and 12 weeks of norfloxacin followed by 12 weeks of placebo in the therapy of complicated urinary tract infection.诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染24周与诺氟沙星治疗12周后再用安慰剂治疗12周的双盲随机对照研究
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1292-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1292.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of pivmecillinam in oral step-down treatment in hospitalised patients with E. coli bacteremic urinary tract infection; a single-arm, uncontrolled treatment study.替马西林在住院大肠埃希菌菌血症性尿路感染患者口服降阶梯治疗中的疗效:一项单臂、非对照治疗研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 19;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07463-7.
2
Oral β-Lactam Antibiotics vs Fluoroquinolones or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Definitive Treatment of Enterobacterales Bacteremia From a Urine Source.口服β-内酰胺类抗生素与氟喹诺酮类或复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗尿源肠杆菌科菌血症的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2020166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20166.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the efficacy of nalidixic acid and cephalexin in bacteriuric women and their effect on fecal and periurethral carriage of enterobacteriaceae.萘啶酸和头孢氨苄对菌尿症女性的疗效比较及其对肠杆菌科细菌在粪便和尿道周围携带情况的影响。
J Infect Dis. 1981 Apr;143(4):603-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.4.603.
2
"Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials.在临床试验中“证明原假设”
Control Clin Trials. 1982 Dec;3(4):345-53. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1.
3
Comparative trial of norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of women with localized, acute, symptomatic urinary tract infections and antimicrobial effect on periurethral and fecal microflora.
Top Questions in Uncomplicated, Non- Bacteremia.
非复杂性、非菌血症的首要问题
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 21;5(5):ofy087. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy087. eCollection 2018 May.
4
Stopping the effective non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics at day 7 vs continuing until day 14 in adults with acute pyelonephritis requiring hospitalization: A randomized non-inferiority trial.对于需要住院治疗的急性肾盂肾炎成人患者,在第 7 天停止使用有效的非氟喹诺酮类抗生素与继续使用至第 14 天相比:一项随机非劣效性试验。
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197302. eCollection 2018.
5
Treatment duration of febrile urinary tract infection: a pragmatic randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial in men and women.发热性尿路感染的治疗疗程:一项针对男性和女性的实用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 3;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0835-3.
6
Treatment duration of febrile urinary tract infections.发热性尿路感染的治疗持续时间。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011 Dec;13(6):571-8. doi: 10.1007/s11908-011-0211-y.
7
Pyelonephritis (acute) in non-pregnant women.非妊娠妇女的急性肾盂肾炎
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jan 13;2011:0807.
8
Treatment duration of febrile urinary tract infection (FUTIRST trial): a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing short (7 days) antibiotic treatment with conventional treatment (14 days).发热性尿路感染的治疗时长(FUTIRST试验):一项随机安慰剂对照多中心试验,比较短期(7天)抗生素治疗与传统治疗(14天)。
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 19;9:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-131.
9
Ceftibuten versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for oral treatment of febrile urinary tract infection in children.头孢布烯与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑用于儿童发热性尿路感染的口服治疗比较
Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Mar;24(3):521-6. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0996-6. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
10
The quinolones and renal infection.喹诺酮类药物与肾脏感染
Drugs. 1999;58 Suppl 2:96-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958002-00019.
诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗女性局部急性症状性尿路感染的对比试验及其对尿道周围和粪便微生物群的抗菌作用
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Oct;26(4):481-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.4.481.
4
Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366) and ten other oral antimicrobial agents against urinary bacterial isolates.诺氟沙星(MK-0366)与其他十种口服抗菌药物对尿细菌分离株的体外活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 May;21(5):848-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.5.848.
5
The possible role of microbial L-forms in pyelonephritis.
J Urol. 1970 Dec;104(6):790-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61838-x.
6
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.抗生素敏感性试验。一项国际合作研究报告。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217:Suppl 217:1+.
7
Relationship of infecting urinary organism to the faecal flora in patients with symptomatic urinary infection.
Lancet. 1969 Oct 11;2(7624):766-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90478-4.
8
Cefadroxil once daily for three or seven days versus amoxycillin for seven days in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.女性单纯性尿路感染患者中,头孢羟氨苄每日一次服用三天或七天与阿莫西林服用七天的疗效对比。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1985;17(1):83-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548509070425.
9
Therapeutic potential of high renal levels of aminoglycosides in pyelonephritis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15(1):4-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.1.4.
10
Norfloxacin penetration into human renal and prostatic tissues.诺氟沙星在人体肾脏和前列腺组织中的渗透情况。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Aug;28(2):349-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.2.349.