• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

思想开放的助产士、识字的屠夫和贪婪的流氓——刻板印象效价和一致性对评价性判断的独立贡献。

Open-Minded Midwifes, Literate Butchers, and Greedy Hooligans-The Independent Contributions of Stereotype Valence and Consistency on Evaluative Judgments.

作者信息

Schubert Lisa, Körner Anita, Lindau Berit, Strack Fritz, Topolinski Sascha

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01723. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01723
PMID:29062289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5640976/
Abstract

Do people evaluate an open-minded midwife less positively than a caring midwife? Both and are generally seen as positive attributes. However, consistency varies-the attribute is consistent with the midwife stereotype while is not. In general, both stimulus valence and consistency can influence evaluations. Six experiments investigated the respective influence of valence and consistency on evaluative judgments in the domain of stereotyping. In an impression formation paradigm, valence and consistency of stereotypic information about target persons were manipulated orthogonally and spontaneous evaluations of these target persons were measured. Valence reliably influenced evaluations. However, for strongly valenced stereotypes, no effect of consistency was observed. Parameters possibly preventing the occurrence of consistency effects were ruled out, specifically, valence of inconsistent attributes, processing priority of category information, and impression formation instructions. However, consistency had subtle effects on evaluative judgments if the information about a target person was not strongly valenced and experimental conditions were optimal. Concluding, in principle, both stereotype valence and consistency can play a role in evaluative judgments of stereotypic target persons. However, the more subtle influence of consistency does not seem to substantially influence evaluations of stereotyped target persons. Implications for fluency research and stereotype disconfirmation are discussed.

摘要

人们对思想开放的助产士的评价是否低于对有爱心的助产士的评价?两者通常都被视为积极的特质。然而,一致性存在差异——特质 与助产士的刻板印象一致,而特质 则不一致。一般来说,刺激效价和一致性都会影响评价。六项实验研究了效价和一致性在刻板印象领域对评价判断的各自影响。在印象形成范式中,对目标人物的刻板信息的效价和一致性进行正交操纵,并测量对这些目标人物的自发评价。效价可靠地影响评价。然而,对于效价强烈的刻板印象,未观察到一致性的影响。排除了可能阻止一致性效应出现的参数,具体来说,不一致属性的效价、类别信息的处理优先级和印象形成指令。然而,如果关于目标人物的信息效价不强且实验条件最佳,一致性会对评价判断产生微妙的影响。总之,原则上,刻板印象的效价和一致性都可以在对刻板印象目标人物的评价判断中发挥作用。然而,一致性更微妙的影响似乎并没有对刻板印象目标人物的评价产生实质性影响。讨论了对流畅性研究和刻板印象证伪的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/a08ad3fc5785/fpsyg-08-01723-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/a706b9dd735c/fpsyg-08-01723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/4f1a0e336f44/fpsyg-08-01723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/2b8f129658d2/fpsyg-08-01723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/b814a2d99dc9/fpsyg-08-01723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/dcf5ae0a5285/fpsyg-08-01723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/a08ad3fc5785/fpsyg-08-01723-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/a706b9dd735c/fpsyg-08-01723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/4f1a0e336f44/fpsyg-08-01723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/2b8f129658d2/fpsyg-08-01723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/b814a2d99dc9/fpsyg-08-01723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/dcf5ae0a5285/fpsyg-08-01723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3c4/5640976/a08ad3fc5785/fpsyg-08-01723-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Open-Minded Midwifes, Literate Butchers, and Greedy Hooligans-The Independent Contributions of Stereotype Valence and Consistency on Evaluative Judgments.思想开放的助产士、识字的屠夫和贪婪的流氓——刻板印象效价和一致性对评价性判断的独立贡献。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01723. eCollection 2017.
2
The stereotype consistency effect is moderated by group membership and trait valence.刻板印象一致性效应受到群体归属和特质效价的调节。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan-Feb;153(1):51-61. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.703710.
3
Effects of affect, stereotype consistency, and valence of behavior on causal attributions.情感、刻板印象一致性及行为效价对因果归因的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;141(1):31-48. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600521.
4
The Bidirectional Causal Relation Between Implicit Stereotypes and Implicit Prejudice.内隐刻板印象和内隐偏见之间的双向因果关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;46(9):1318-1330. doi: 10.1177/0146167219899234. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing.可预测的确认性:决策过程中刻板印象的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Oct;72(10):2437-2451. doi: 10.1177/1747021819844219. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Not all stereotypic biases are created equal: evidence for a stereotype-disconfirming bias.并非所有刻板印象偏差都是一样的:存在一种与刻板印象不符的偏差的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):706-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262850.
7
Explaining Extremity in Evaluation of Group Members: Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Theories.解释群体成员评估中的极端情况:三种理论的元分析检验。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):49-74. doi: 10.1177/1088868315574461. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
8
Communicating stereotype-relevant information: is factual information subject to the same communication biases as fictional information?传达与刻板印象相关的信息:事实性信息是否会受到与虚构信息相同的传播偏见影响?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;35(7):836-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167209334780. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
9
Different brain mechanisms between stereotype activation and application: evidence from an ERP study.刻板印象激活与应用的不同脑机制:一项 ERP 研究的证据。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(1):58-66. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.580348. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
10
Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 May;72(5):1002-16. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1002.

本文引用的文献

1
Trustworthy Tricksters: Violating a Negative Social Expectation Affects Source Memory and Person Perception When Fear of Exploitation Is High.值得信赖的骗子:当被剥削的恐惧很高时,违背负面社会期望会影响来源记忆和人物感知。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7:2037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02037. eCollection 2016.
2
Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming.相位情感调制语义启动。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):414-36. doi: 10.1037/a0028879. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
3
Seeing is believing: trustworthiness as a dynamic belief.
眼见为实:信任是一种动态的信念。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):87-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001.
4
When is the unfamiliar the uncanny? Meaning affirmation after exposure to absurdist literature, humor, and art.当陌生变得诡异?接触荒诞主义文学、幽默和艺术后的意义肯定。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jun;36(6):817-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167210369896. Epub 2010 May 5.
5
Motormouth: mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations.健谈者:单纯暴露效应取决于特定刺激的运动模拟。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):423-33. doi: 10.1037/a0014504.
6
The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.直觉的架构:流畅性与情感决定了对语义和视觉连贯性的直觉判断以及人工语法学习中的语法性判断。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):39-63. doi: 10.1037/a0014678.
7
The case of the transmogrifying experimenter: affirmation of a moral schema following implicit change detection.变形实验者的案例:隐性变化检测后道德模式的确认
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1294-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02238.x.
8
Scanning the "Fringe" of consciousness: what is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence.审视意识的“边缘”:语义连贯直觉中能感知到的与无法感知到的内容。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):608-18. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
9
Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis.为何积极信息处理得更快:密度假说。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):36-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36.
10
Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: the peak-end rule.愉悦体验的评估:峰终定律。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):96-8. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.96.