Rolfe Danielle E, Ramsden Vivian R, Banner Davina, Graham Ian D
1School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 307D- 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3 Canada.
2Department of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, West Winds Primary Health Centre, 3311 Fairlight Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7M 3Y5 Canada.
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.
Patient engagement (or patient and public involvement) in health research is becoming a requirement for many health research funders, yet many researchers have little or no experience in engaging patients as partners as opposed to research subjects. Additionally, many patients have no experience providing input on the research design or acting as a decision-making partner on a research team. Several potential risks exist when patient engagement is done poorly, despite best intentions. Some of these risks are that: (1) patients' involvement is merely tokenism (patients are involved but their suggestions have little influence on how research is conducted); (2) engaged patients do not represent the diversity of people affected by the research; and, (3) research outcomes lack relevance to patients' lives and experiences.Qualitative health research (the collection and systematic analysis of non-quantitative data about peoples' experiences of health or illness and the healthcare system) offers several approaches that can help to mitigate these risks. Several qualitative health research methods, when done well, can help research teams to: (1) accurately incorporate patients' perspectives and experiences into the design and conduct of research; (2) engage diverse patient perspectives; and, (3) treat patients as equal and ongoing partners on the research team.This commentary presents several established qualitative health research methods that are relevant to patient engagement in research. The hope is that this paper will inspire readers to seek more information about qualitative health research, and consider how its established methods may help improve the quality and ethical conduct of patient engagement for health research.
Research funders in several countries have posited a new vision for research that involves patients and the public as co-applicants for the funding, and as collaborative partners in decision-making at various stages and/or throughout the research process. Patient engagement (or patient and public involvement) in health research is presented as a more democratic approach that leads to research that is relevant to the lives of the people affected by its outcomes. What is missing from the recent proliferation of resources and publications detailing the practical aspects of patient engagement is a recognition of how existing research methods can inform patient engagement initiatives. Qualitative health research, for example, has established methods of collecting and analyzing non-quantitative data about individuals' and communities' lived experiences with health, illness and/or the healthcare system. Included in the paradigm of qualitative health research is participatory health research, which offers approaches to partnering with individuals and communities to design and conduct research that addresses their needs and priorities. The purpose of this commentary is to explore how qualitative health research methods can inform and support meaningful engagement with patients as partners. Specifically, this paper addresses issues of: (how can patient engagement in research be done well?); (are the right patients being engaged?); and, (is engagement being done in ways that are meaningful, ethical and equitable?). Various qualitative research methods are presented to increase the rigour found within patient engagement. Approaches to engage more diverse patient perspectives are presented to improve representation beyond the common practice of engaging only one or two patients. Reflexivity, or the practice of identifying and articulating how research processes and outcomes are constructed by the respective personal and professional experiences of researchers and patients, is presented to support the development of authentic, sustainable, equitable and meaningful engagement of patients as partners in health research. Researchers will need to engage patients as stakeholders in order to satisfy the overlapping mandate in health policy, care and research for engaging patients as partners in decision-making. This paper presents several suggestions to ground patient engagement approaches in established research designs and methods.
患者参与(或患者及公众参与)健康研究正成为许多健康研究资助者的一项要求,但许多研究人员几乎没有或完全没有将患者作为合作伙伴而非研究对象来参与的经验。此外,许多患者也没有为研究设计提供意见或在研究团队中担任决策伙伴的经验。尽管初衷良好,但如果患者参与工作做得不好,就会存在一些潜在风险。其中一些风险包括:(1)患者的参与只是形式主义(患者参与了,但他们的建议对研究的开展几乎没有影响);(2)参与的患者不能代表受该研究影响的人群的多样性;以及(3)研究结果与患者的生活和经历缺乏相关性。定性健康研究(收集和系统分析关于人们健康或疾病经历以及医疗保健系统的非定量数据)提供了几种有助于降低这些风险的方法。几种定性健康研究方法如果运用得当,可以帮助研究团队:(1)在研究设计和开展过程中准确纳入患者的观点和经历;(2)让不同的患者观点参与进来;以及(3)将患者视为研究团队中平等且持续的合作伙伴。本评论介绍了几种与患者参与研究相关的既定定性健康研究方法。希望本文能激发读者寻求更多关于定性健康研究的信息,并思考其既定方法如何有助于提高患者参与健康研究工作中的质量和道德规范。
几个国家的研究资助者提出了一种新的研究愿景,即让患者和公众作为资金的共同申请者,并在各个阶段和/或整个研究过程中作为决策的合作伙伴。患者参与(或患者及公众参与)健康研究被视为一种更民主的方式,能带来与受研究结果影响的人们的生活相关的研究。在近期大量详细阐述患者参与实际方面的资源和出版物中,缺少对现有研究方法如何为患者参与计划提供信息的认识。例如,定性健康研究已经建立了收集和分析关于个人和社区健康、疾病及/或医疗保健系统生活经历的非定量数据的方法。定性健康研究范式包括参与性健康研究,它提供了与个人和社区合作设计和开展满足他们需求与优先事项的研究的方法。本评论的目的是探讨定性健康研究方法如何为与患者作为合作伙伴进行有意义的参与提供信息并提供支持。具体而言,本文探讨以下问题:(如何做好患者参与研究工作?);(是否让了正确的患者参与进来?);以及(参与的方式是否有意义、符合道德且公平?)。介绍了各种定性研究方法以提高患者参与工作的严谨性。提出了让更多不同患者观点参与进来的方法,以改善仅让一两个患者参与的常见做法之外的代表性。反思性,即识别和阐述研究过程和结果如何由研究人员和患者各自的个人及专业经历构建的做法,被提出来支持在健康研究中让患者作为合作伙伴进行真实、可持续、公平且有意义的参与的发展。研究人员需要将患者作为利益相关者参与进来,以便满足健康政策、护理和研究中让患者作为决策合作伙伴的重叠要求。本文提出了一些建议,以使患者参与方法基于既定的研究设计和方法。