Tulbure Bogdan Tudor, Andersson Gerhard, Sălăgean Nastasia, Pearce Michelle, Koenig Harold G
Department of Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Bd. V. Pârvan No. 4, 300223, Timişoara, Romania.
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
J Relig Health. 2018 Oct;57(5):1634-1648. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0503-0.
The accessibility and efficacy of two Internet-supported interventions for depression: conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (C-CBT) and religious CBT (R-CBT) were investigated. Depressed participants (N = 79) were randomly assigned to either active treatment or wait-listed control group. Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and life quality were collected before, immediately after, and 6 months after the intervention. Significant differences among the three conditions emerged at post-intervention with medium to large effect sizes (Cohen's d between 0.45 and 1.89), but no differences between the R-CBT and C-CBT were found. However, the addition of religious components to CBT contributed to the initial treatment appeal for religious participants, thus increasing the treatment accessibility.
对两种互联网支持的抑郁症干预措施——传统认知行为疗法（C-CBT）和宗教认知行为疗法（R-CBT）的可及性和疗效进行了调查。抑郁参与者（N = 79）被随机分配到积极治疗组或等待名单对照组。在干预前、干预后立即以及干预后6个月收集抑郁、焦虑和生活质量的自我报告测量数据。干预后三种情况之间出现了显著差异，效应大小为中到大（科恩d值在0.45至1.89之间），但未发现R-CBT和C-CBT之间存在差异。然而，在CBT中加入宗教成分有助于提高宗教参与者对初始治疗的吸引力，从而提高治疗的可及性。
