NICM, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 17;44(6):1293-1300. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx149.
Previous physical activity (PA) research in schizophrenia has relied largely upon self-report measures. However, the accuracy of this method is questionable. Obtaining accurate measurements, and determining what may influence PA levels in schizophrenia, is essential to understand physical inactivity in this population. This study examined differences in self-reported and objectively measured PA in people with schizophrenia and the general population using a large, population-based dataset from the UK Biobank.
Baseline data from the UK Biobank (2007-2010) were analyzed; including 1078 people with schizophrenia (54.19 ± 8.39 years; 55% male) and 450549 without (56.44 ± 8.11; 46% male). We compared self-reported PA with objectively measured accelerometry data in schizophrenia and comparison samples. We also examined correlations between self-report and objective measures.
People with schizophrenia reported the same PA levels as those without, with no differences in low, moderate, or vigorous intensity activity. However, accelerometry data showed a large and statistically significant reduction of PA in schizophrenia; as people with schizophrenia, on average, engaged in less PA than 80% of the general population. Nonetheless, within the schizophrenia sample, total self-reported PA still held significant correlations with objective measures.
People with schizophrenia are significantly less active than the general population. However, self-report measures in epidemiological studies fail to capture the reduced activity levels in schizophrenia. This also has implications for self-report measures of other lifestyle factors which may contribute toward the poor health outcomes observed in schizophrenia. Nonetheless, self-report measures may still be useful for identifying how active individuals with schizophrenia relative to other patients.
先前关于精神分裂症的体力活动(PA)研究主要依赖于自我报告的测量方法。然而,这种方法的准确性值得怀疑。获得准确的测量结果,并确定哪些因素可能影响精神分裂症患者的 PA 水平,对于理解该人群的身体活动不足至关重要。本研究使用来自英国生物库的大型人群数据集,比较了精神分裂症患者和一般人群中自我报告和客观测量的 PA 之间的差异。
对英国生物库(2007-2010 年)的基线数据进行了分析,包括 1078 名精神分裂症患者(54.19 ± 8.39 岁;55%为男性)和 450549 名无精神分裂症患者(56.44 ± 8.11;46%为男性)。我们比较了精神分裂症和对照组患者的自我报告 PA 与客观测量的加速度计数据。我们还检查了自我报告和客观测量之间的相关性。
精神分裂症患者报告的 PA 水平与无精神分裂症患者相同,低、中、高强度活动均无差异。然而,加速度计数据显示精神分裂症患者的 PA 明显减少,且具有统计学意义;精神分裂症患者的平均 PA 水平低于一般人群的 80%。尽管如此,在精神分裂症患者样本中,总自我报告 PA 与客观测量仍有显著相关性。
精神分裂症患者的活动量明显低于一般人群。然而,流行病学研究中的自我报告测量方法未能捕捉到精神分裂症患者活动水平的降低。这也对自我报告的其他生活方式因素的测量方法产生了影响,这些因素可能导致精神分裂症患者健康状况不佳。尽管如此,自我报告的测量方法仍可用于确定精神分裂症患者相对于其他患者的活动水平。