Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Institute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jan;38(1):23-31. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.23.
The identification of clinically meaningful specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) is important for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Various in vitro sIgE detection methods are available worldwide. Depending on the number of antigens that can be tested simultaneously, there are two representative methods: singleplex and multiplex. Singleplex sIgE detection is mainly provided by Thermo Fisher (ImmunoCAP) and Siemens (Immulite). This study aimed to compare the diagnostic agreement of two singleplex sIgE detection assays.
Sera from 209 Korean patients with allergic disease were used to compare the ImmunoCAP and Immulite assays with respect to the following allergens: inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae, cat and dog dander, oak, rye grass, mugwort, Alternaria, German cockroach) and food allergens (hen's egg white, cow's milk, wheat, peanut, soybean, and shrimp). Data from 902 paired comparison tests were included for comparisons. Qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative comparisons were performed using statistical analyses.
In qualitative comparisons, the positivity and negativity agreements ranged from 75% (wheat, shrimp) to 96% (Alternaria). Class consistency (classes 0-6) was well matched. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for all allergens except shrimp were over 0.7. In quantitative comparisons, all allergens excluding shrimp showed >0.7 intra-class correlation coefficients.
The ImmunoCAP and Immulite systems showed similar performances. However, clinicians should consider fundamental methodological differences between the assays.
特异性免疫球蛋白 E(sIgE)的临床意义的识别对于过敏性疾病的诊断和管理很重要。世界各地都有各种体外 sIgE 检测方法。根据可以同时测试的抗原数量,有两种代表性的方法:单plex 和 multiplex。单plex sIgE 检测主要由 Thermo Fisher(ImmunoCAP)和 Siemens(Immulite)提供。本研究旨在比较两种单plex sIgE 检测方法的诊断一致性。
使用来自 209 名韩国过敏性疾病患者的血清,比较 ImmunoCAP 和 Immulite 检测方法在以下过敏原方面的表现:吸入性过敏原(粉尘螨、猫和狗皮屑、栎树、黑麦草、艾蒿、交链孢霉、德国蟑螂)和食物过敏原(鸡蛋白、牛奶、小麦、花生、大豆和虾)。共纳入了 902 对比较测试的数据进行比较。使用统计分析进行定性、半定量和定量比较。
在定性比较中,阳性和阴性一致性范围为 75%(小麦、虾)至 96%(交链孢霉)。类别一致性(0-6 级)匹配良好。除虾外,所有过敏原的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数均超过 0.7。在定量比较中,除虾外,所有过敏原的组内相关系数均大于 0.7。
ImmunoCAP 和 Immulite 系统表现出相似的性能。然而,临床医生应考虑两种检测方法之间的基本方法学差异。