• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DNA复制应激导致脆性位点不稳定。

DNA replication stress drives fragile site instability.

作者信息

Irony-Tur Sinai Michal, Kerem Batsheva

机构信息

Department of Genetics, The Life Sciences Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.

Department of Genetics, The Life Sciences Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2018 Mar;808:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.002
PMID:29074228
Abstract

DNA replication stress is one of the early drivers enabling the ongoing acquisition of genetic changes arising during tumorigenesis. As such, it is a feature of most pre-malignant and malignant cells. In this review article, we focus on the early events initiating DNA replication stress and the preferential sensitivity of common fragile sites (CFSs) to this stress. CFSs are specific genomic regions within the normal chromosomal structure, which appear as gaps and breaks in the metaphase chromosomes of cells grown under mild replication stress conditions. The main characteristics predisposing CFSs to instability include late replication timing, delayed replication completion, failure to activate additional origins, origin paucity along large genomic regions, collision between replication and transcription complexes along large genes, and the presence of AT-dinucleotide rich sequences. The contribution of these features to instability at CFSs during early cancer development is discussed.

摘要

DNA复制应激是肿瘤发生过程中促使持续获得遗传变化的早期驱动因素之一。因此,它是大多数癌前和恶性细胞的一个特征。在这篇综述文章中,我们聚焦于引发DNA复制应激的早期事件以及常见脆性位点(CFSs)对这种应激的优先敏感性。CFSs是正常染色体结构内的特定基因组区域,在轻度复制应激条件下生长的细胞的中期染色体中表现为间隙和断裂。使CFSs易于出现不稳定性的主要特征包括复制时间晚、复制完成延迟、未能激活额外的复制起点、沿大基因组区域的复制起点稀少、沿大基因的复制和转录复合体之间的碰撞以及富含AT二核苷酸序列的存在。本文讨论了这些特征在癌症早期发展过程中对CFSs不稳定性的影响。

相似文献

1
DNA replication stress drives fragile site instability.DNA复制应激导致脆性位点不稳定。
Mutat Res. 2018 Mar;808:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Genomic instability in fragile sites-still adding the pieces.脆性位点的基因组不稳定性——仍在添砖加瓦。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 May;58(5):295-304. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22715. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Impaired Replication Timing Promotes Tissue-Specific Expression of Common Fragile Sites.复制定时障碍促进常见脆弱部位的组织特异性表达。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;11(3):326. doi: 10.3390/genes11030326.
4
Insights into common fragile site instability: DNA replication challenges at DNA repeat sequences.常见脆弱部位不稳定性的研究进展:DNA 重复序列处的 DNA 复制挑战。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2023 Dec 14;7(3):277-287. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20230023.
5
Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.遗传因素和表观遗传因素之间的相互作用决定了癌症中常见脆性位点的不稳定性。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Dec;71(23):4495-506. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1719-8. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited.常见脆弱部位:不稳定性机制的再探讨。
Trends Genet. 2012 Jan;28(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
7
The complex basis underlying common fragile site instability in cancer.常见脆弱部位不稳定在癌症中复杂的基础。
Trends Genet. 2012 Jun;28(6):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
8
Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites.稳定转染的常见脆性位点序列在异位位点表现出不稳定性。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 Oct;47(10):860-72. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20591.
9
Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis.复制压力会在有丝分裂中激活 DNA 修复合成。
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):286-90. doi: 10.1038/nature16139. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites.复制叉停滞引发的起始激活失败导致脆性位点的染色体不稳定性。
Mol Cell. 2011 Jul 8;43(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.019.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA replication timing reveals genome-wide features of transcription and fragility.DNA复制时间揭示了全基因组范围内转录和脆弱性的特征。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 19;16(1):4658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59991-w.
2
Selective interactions at pre-replication complexes categorize baseline and dormant origins.复制前复合体处的选择性相互作用对基线起源和休眠起源进行了分类。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 3;16(1):4140. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59509-4.
3
Novel Oncogenic Value of C10orf90 in Colon Cancer Identified as a Clinical Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker.
鉴定 C10orf90 在结肠癌中的致癌新价值,作为临床诊断和预后标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 29;25(19):10496. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910496.
4
MutSβ protects common fragile sites by facilitating homology-directed repair at DNA double-strand breaks with secondary structures.MutSβ 通过促进具有二级结构的 DNA 双链断裂处的同源定向修复来保护常见脆弱位点。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Feb 9;52(3):1120-1135. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1112.
5
Replication Stress: A Review of Novel Targets to Enhance Radiosensitivity-From Bench to Clinic.复制应激:增强放射敏感性的新靶点综述——从实验台到临床
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 8;12:838637. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.838637. eCollection 2022.
6
Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.复制压力、基因组不稳定性和复制时间:复杂的关系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 30;22(9):4764. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094764.
7
Sites of chromosomal instability in the context of nuclear architecture and function.染色体不稳定性在核架构和功能方面的作用。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021 Mar;78(5):2095-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03698-2. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8
Topoisomerase II contributes to DNA secondary structure-mediated double-stranded breaks.拓扑异构酶 II 有助于 DNA 二级结构介导的双链断裂。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jul 9;48(12):6654-6671. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa483.
9
Working on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis.致力于基因组稳定性:从 S 期到有丝分裂。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Feb 20;11(2):225. doi: 10.3390/genes11020225.
10
The processivity factor Pol32 mediates nuclear localization of DNA polymerase delta and prevents chromosomal fragile site formation in Drosophila development.延伸因子 Pol32 介导 DNA 聚合酶 δ 的核定位,防止果蝇发育过程中染色体脆性位点的形成。
PLoS Genet. 2019 May 17;15(5):e1008169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008169. eCollection 2019 May.