• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复制定时障碍促进常见脆弱部位的组织特异性表达。

Impaired Replication Timing Promotes Tissue-Specific Expression of Common Fragile Sites.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.

The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;11(3):326. doi: 10.3390/genes11030326.

DOI:10.3390/genes11030326
PMID:32204553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7140878/
Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are particularly vulnerable regions of the genome that become visible as breaks, gaps, or constrictions on metaphase chromosomes when cells are under replicative stress. Impairment in DNA replication, late replication timing, enrichment of A/T nucleotides that tend to form secondary structures, the paucity of active or inducible replication origins, the generation of R-loops, and the collision between replication and transcription machineries on particularly long genes are some of the reported characteristics of CFSs that may contribute to their tissue-specific fragility. Here, we validated the induction of two CFSs previously found in the human fetal lung fibroblast line, Medical Research Council strain (MRC-5), in another cell line derived from the same fetal tissue, Institute for Medical Research-90 cells (IMR-90). After induction of CFSs through aphidicolin, we confirmed the expression of the CFS 1p31.1 on chromosome 1 and CFS 3q13.3 on chromosome 3 in both fetal lines. Interestingly, these sites were found to not be fragile in lymphocytes, suggesting a role for epigenetic or transcriptional programs for this tissue specificity. Both these sites contained late-replicating genes NEGR1 (neuronal growth regulator 1) at 1p31.1 and LSAMP (limbic system-associated membrane protein) at 3q13.3, which are much longer, 0.880 and 1.4 Mb, respectively, than the average gene length. Given the established connection between long genes and CFS, we compiled information from the literature on all previously identified CFSs expressed in fibroblasts and lymphocytes in response to aphidicolin, including the size of the genes contained in each fragile region. Our comprehensive analysis confirmed that the genes found within CFSs are longer than the average human gene; interestingly, the two longest genes in the human genome are found within CFSs: Contactin Associated Protein 2 gene () in a lymphocytes' CFS, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene ( in a CFS expressed in both lymphocytes and fibroblasts. This indicates that the presence of very long genes is a unifying feature of all CFSs. We also obtained replication profiles of the 1p31.1 and 3q13.3 sites under both perturbed and unperturbed conditions using a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunofluorescence against bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) on interphase nuclei. Our analysis of the replication dynamics of these CFSs showed that, compared to lymphocytes where these regions are non-fragile, fibroblasts display incomplete replication of the fragile alleles, even in the absence of exogenous replication stress. Our data point to the existence of intrinsic features, in addition to the presence of long genes, which affect DNA replication of the CFSs in fibroblasts, thus promoting chromosomal instability in a tissue-specific manner.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/91f1e4e51cc3/genes-11-00326-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/88208c803add/genes-11-00326-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/b8785bdfcd52/genes-11-00326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/c4c9f3b3f9b3/genes-11-00326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/470f2f28d46f/genes-11-00326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/3f644eac5e78/genes-11-00326-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/91f1e4e51cc3/genes-11-00326-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/88208c803add/genes-11-00326-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/b8785bdfcd52/genes-11-00326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/c4c9f3b3f9b3/genes-11-00326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/470f2f28d46f/genes-11-00326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/3f644eac5e78/genes-11-00326-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6092/7140878/91f1e4e51cc3/genes-11-00326-g006.jpg
摘要

常见脆弱位点(CFSs)是基因组中特别脆弱的区域,当细胞处于复制应激状态时,这些区域在中期染色体上表现为断裂、缺口或收缩。DNA 复制受损、复制时间延迟、富含易于形成二级结构的 A/T 核苷酸、缺乏活性或诱导复制起始点、R-环的产生以及复制和转录机制在特别长的基因上的碰撞,这些都是 CFSs 的一些报道特征,这些特征可能导致它们在组织中的脆弱性。在这里,我们通过阿非迪考林诱导两种先前在人胎儿肺成纤维细胞系 Medical Research Council 株(MRC-5)中发现的 CFS,在来自同一胎儿组织的另一种细胞系 Institute for Medical Research-90 细胞(IMR-90)中进行了验证。在 CFSs 诱导后,我们在两个胎儿系中均证实了染色体 1 上的 CFS 1p31.1 和染色体 3 上的 CFS 3q13.3 的表达。有趣的是,这些位点在淋巴细胞中并不脆弱,这表明这种组织特异性可能与表观遗传或转录程序有关。这两个位点都包含在 1p31.1 上的晚期复制基因 NEGR1(神经元生长调节剂 1)和在 3q13.3 上的 LSAMP(边缘系统相关膜蛋白),它们分别比平均基因长度长 0.880 和 1.4Mb。鉴于长基因与 CFS 之间已建立的联系,我们从文献中收集了所有先前在响应阿非迪考林时在成纤维细胞和淋巴细胞中表达的 CFS 的信息,包括每个脆弱区域中包含的基因大小。我们的综合分析证实,CFS 内发现的基因比人类平均基因长;有趣的是,人类基因组中最长的两个基因都位于 CFS 内:淋巴细胞中的 Contactin Associated Protein 2 基因()和 CFS 中的 Duchenne 肌营养不良基因()在成纤维细胞和淋巴细胞中均有表达。这表明非常长的基因的存在是所有 CFS 的一个统一特征。我们还使用荧光原位杂交(FISH)和溴脱氧尿苷(BrdU)免疫荧光组合,在干扰和未干扰条件下,获得了 1p31.1 和 3q13.3 位点的复制图谱。我们对这些 CFS 复制动力学的分析表明,与这些区域在淋巴细胞中不脆弱的情况相比,成纤维细胞显示脆弱等位基因的复制不完全,即使在没有外源性复制应激的情况下也是如此。我们的数据表明,除了长基因的存在之外,还存在内在特征会影响成纤维细胞中 CFS 的 DNA 复制,从而以组织特异性的方式促进染色体不稳定性。

相似文献

1
Impaired Replication Timing Promotes Tissue-Specific Expression of Common Fragile Sites.复制定时障碍促进常见脆弱部位的组织特异性表达。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;11(3):326. doi: 10.3390/genes11030326.
2
Translesion polymerase eta both facilitates DNA replication and promotes increased human genetic variation at common fragile sites.跨损伤聚合酶 eta 既能促进 DNA 复制,又能增加常见脆弱位点的人类遗传变异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 30;118(48). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106477118.
3
Insights into common fragile site instability: DNA replication challenges at DNA repeat sequences.常见脆弱部位不稳定性的研究进展:DNA 重复序列处的 DNA 复制挑战。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2023 Dec 14;7(3):277-287. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20230023.
4
Replication timing of two human common fragile sites: FRA1H and FRA2G.两个人类常见脆性位点FRA1H和FRA2G的复制时间。
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;121(3-4):196-200. doi: 10.1159/000138885. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
5
Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress.大型转录单位统一了复制应激下产生的拷贝数变异和常见脆性位点。
Genome Res. 2015 Feb;25(2):189-200. doi: 10.1101/gr.177121.114. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
DNA replication stress drives fragile site instability.DNA复制应激导致脆性位点不稳定。
Mutat Res. 2018 Mar;808:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
FANCD2 binding identifies conserved fragile sites at large transcribed genes in avian cells.FANCD2 结合鉴定了禽类细胞中大型转录基因上保守的脆弱位点。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Feb 16;46(3):1280-1294. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1260.
8
Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites.稳定转染的常见脆性位点序列在异位位点表现出不稳定性。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 Oct;47(10):860-72. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20591.
9
Common Fragile Sites Are Characterized by Faulty Condensin Loading after Replication Stress.常见脆弱位点的特征是复制应激后有缺陷的凝聚素加载。
Cell Rep. 2020 Sep 22;32(12):108177. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108177.
10
3D genome organization contributes to genome instability at fragile sites.三维基因组组织导致脆弱位点的基因组不稳定。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 17;11(1):3613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17448-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Safeguards Disabled by Epstein-Barr Virus Infections in Genomes From Patients With Breast Cancer: Chromosomal Bioinformatics Analysis.识别乳腺癌患者基因组中因爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染而失效的保护机制:染色体生物信息学分析
JMIRx Med. 2025 Jan 29;6:e50712. doi: 10.2196/50712.
2
High heritability of human facial traits reveals associations with , and loci in Korean families.人类面部特征的高遗传力揭示了与韩国家庭中 、 和 基因座的关联。 (原文此处有缺失信息)
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 10;10(20):e39173. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39173. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
3
Comparative analysis of predicted DNA secondary structures infers complex human centromere topology.

本文引用的文献

1
Repetitive Fragile Sites: Centromere Satellite DNA As a Source of Genome Instability in Human Diseases.重复性脆性位点:着丝粒卫星DNA作为人类疾病中基因组不稳定的一个来源
Genes (Basel). 2018 Dec 7;9(12):615. doi: 10.3390/genes9120615.
2
Genomic instability in fragile sites-still adding the pieces.脆性位点的基因组不稳定性——仍在添砖加瓦。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 May;58(5):295-304. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22715. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
WWOX, the FRA16D gene: A target of and a contributor to genomic instability.WWOX 基因,FRA16D 基因:基因组不稳定性的靶点和贡献者。
对预测的DNA二级结构进行比较分析可推断出复杂的人类着丝粒拓扑结构。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Dec 5;111(12):2707-2719. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.016. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Replication stress induces POLQ-mediated structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites after entry into mitosis.复制压力诱导 POLQ 介导的结构变异形成,在有丝分裂进入后贯穿常见脆弱部位。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 6;15(1):9582. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53917-8.
5
Replication timing alterations are associated with mutation acquisition during breast and lung cancer evolution.复制时间改变与乳腺癌和肺癌进化过程中的突变获得有关。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 18;15(1):6039. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50107-4.
6
Time is ticking faster for long genes in aging.随着衰老,长基因的时间过得越来越快。
Trends Genet. 2024 Apr;40(4):299-312. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
7
FANCD2 promotes mitotic rescue from transcription-mediated replication stress in SETX-deficient cancer cells.FANCD2 促进 SETX 缺陷型癌细胞中由转录介导的复制应激引起的有丝分裂拯救。
Commun Biol. 2022 Dec 21;5(1):1395. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04360-2.
8
New Era of Mapping and Understanding Common Fragile Sites: An Updated Review on Origin of Chromosome Fragility.绘制与理解常见脆性位点的新时代:关于染色体脆性起源的最新综述
Front Genet. 2022 May 20;13:906957. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.906957. eCollection 2022.
9
Circulating small RNA signatures differentiate accurately the subtypes of muscular dystrophies: small-RNA next-generation sequencing analytics and functional insights.循环小 RNA 特征可准确区分肌营养不良症的亚型:小 RNA 下一代测序分析和功能见解。
RNA Biol. 2022;19(1):507-518. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2022.2058817. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
10
Characterization of Chromosomal Instability in Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤中染色体不稳定性的特征分析
Front Genet. 2022 Jan 28;12:810793. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.810793. eCollection 2021.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 May;58(5):324-338. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22693. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.叉突高速推进诱导 DNA 复制应激和基因组不稳定性。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):279-284. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0261-5. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
TUSC7: A novel tumor suppressor long non-coding RNA in human cancers.TUSC7:人类癌症中的一种新型肿瘤抑制长非编码 RNA。
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Sep;233(9):6401-6407. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26544. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
6
Neuronal Growth and Behavioral Alterations in Mice Deficient for the Psychiatric Disease-Associated Gene.缺乏与精神疾病相关基因的小鼠的神经元生长和行为改变
Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Feb 9;11:30. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00030. eCollection 2018.
7
Perturbations in the Replication Program Contribute to Genomic Instability in Cancer.复制程序中的扰动导致癌症中的基因组不稳定。
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May 25;18(6):1138. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061138.
8
Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis.复制压力会在有丝分裂中激活 DNA 修复合成。
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):286-90. doi: 10.1038/nature16139. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
9
The FHIT gene product: tumor suppressor and genome "caretaker".FHIT基因产物:肿瘤抑制因子与基因组“守护者”
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Dec;71(23):4577-87. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1722-0. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
10
Are common fragile sites merely structural domains or highly organized "functional" units susceptible to oncogenic stress?常见脆性位点仅仅是结构域还是易受致癌应激影响的高度组织化的“功能”单元?
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Dec;71(23):4519-44. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1717-x. Epub 2014 Sep 20.