• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient-provider disconnect: A qualitative exploration of understanding and perceptions to care integration.患者与医疗服务提供者之间的脱节:对护理整合的理解与认知的质性探索。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 27;12(10):e0187372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187372. eCollection 2017.
2
Measuring integrated care.衡量整合式照护。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245.
3
Readiness to deliver person-focused care in a fragile situation: the case of Mental Health Services in Lebanon.在脆弱环境中提供以人为本的护理的准备情况:以黎巴嫩的心理健康服务为例。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Mar 2;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00446-2.
4
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
Understanding and expectation towards pharmaceutical care among patients, caregivers and pharmacy service providers: a qualitative study.患者、照料者和药剂师对药学服务的认知和期望:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan;27(1):25-30. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001415. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Healthcare providers' perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study.医疗保健提供者对同情心的感知障碍和促进因素的看法:扎根理论研究的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2083-2097. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14357.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.综合照护的更新发展模式:系统评价与模式更新
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12610-2.
2
Integrating HIV prevention with family planning services for adolescent girls and young women in Uganda: perspectives of adolescent girls and young women, health care providers, and policymakers.乌干达将艾滋病毒预防与青少年女孩和年轻女性的计划生育服务相结合:青少年女孩和年轻女性、医疗服务提供者及政策制定者的观点
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Feb 24;7:1441829. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1441829. eCollection 2025.
3
The Integrated Care World is a Stage: Applying Goffman's Theory of Dramaturgy to the Activities of Integrated Care.整合照护世界如同一台戏:将戈夫曼的拟剧理论应用于整合照护活动
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Aug 26;24(3):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8639. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Identifying Key Themes of Care Coordination for Patients with Chronic Conditions in Singapore: A Scoping Review.识别新加坡慢性病患者护理协调的关键主题:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 25;11(11):1546. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111546.
5
Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for navigating breast cancer survivorship care.制定并初步测试用于乳腺癌生存者照护的决策辅助工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 15;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02056-5.
6
Interaction at the primary-secondary care interface: Patients' and physicians' perceptions of teleconsultations.基层医疗与二级医疗衔接界面的互动:患者与医生对远程会诊的看法。
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 28;8:20552076221133698. doi: 10.1177/20552076221133698. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Patients' perception of colorectal cancer surveillance in the community: an exploratory study.患者对社区结直肠癌监测的认知:一项探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;22(1):2122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14485-y.
8
Experiences of Patients and Their Caregivers Admitted to a Hospital-at-Home Program in Singapore: a Descriptive Qualitative Study.新加坡居家医院项目中患者及其护理人员的体验:描述性定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):691-698. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07765-1. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
A qualitative study of challenges and enablers faced by private general practitioners providing primary care to patients with complex needs in Singapore.一项关于新加坡为有复杂需求患者提供初级护理的私立全科医生所面临挑战与促成因素的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 19;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01625-x.
10
Asian Attitudes and Perceptions Toward Hospital-At-Home: A Cross-Sectional Study.亚洲人对家庭医院的态度和看法:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;9:704465. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.704465. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
How personal and standardized coordination impact implementation of integrated care.个性化与标准化协调如何影响综合护理的实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 2;15:448. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1079-6.
2
Community-based primary health care for older adults: a qualitative study of the perceptions of clients, caregivers and health care providers.基于社区的老年人初级卫生保健:对客户、护理人员和医疗保健提供者认知的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Apr 30;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0052-x.
3
Asking the Patient About Patient-Centered Medical Homes: A Qualitative Analysis.向患者询问以患者为中心的医疗之家:一项定性分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1461-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3312-8. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Health care consumers' perspectives on pharmacist integration into private general practitioner clinics in Malaysia: a qualitative study.马来西亚医疗保健消费者对药剂师融入私人全科医生诊所的看法:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Mar 19;9:467-77. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S73953. eCollection 2015.
5
Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review.老年人从医院到家庭过渡性护理干预后的优质护理结果:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 15;14:346. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-346.
6
Discontinuity of care at end of life: a qualitative exploration of OOH end of life care.临终关怀中的护理间断:对非工作时间临终关怀的质性探索
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;3(4):412-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000266. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
7
A framework for understanding outcomes of integrated care programs for the hospitalised elderly.理解老年住院患者综合护理计划结果的框架。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Nov 28;13:e047. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1063. eCollection 2013.
8
Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care.理解整合照护:基于初级保健综合功能的全面概念框架。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
9
Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots.整合照护的障碍与促进因素:来自英国综合照护试点的经验。
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Jul 24;12:e129. doi: 10.5334/ijic.982. Print 2012 Jul-Sep.
10
A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas.一项针对十个国家的初级保健医生的调查显示,在卫生信息技术的使用方面取得了进展,但在其他领域进展有限。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2805-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

患者与医疗服务提供者之间的脱节:对护理整合的理解与认知的质性探索。

Patient-provider disconnect: A qualitative exploration of understanding and perceptions to care integration.

作者信息

Lai Yi Feng, Lum Andrew Yew Wai, Ho Emily Tse Lin, Lim Yee Wei

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Sengkang Health, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Pharmacy, Raffles Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 27;12(10):e0187372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187372. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187372
PMID:29077758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5659677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrated care has been well-recognized as a solution to improve quality of care for patients with complex needs. As Singapore increasingly develops and promotes integrated models of care, it is unclear if providers, patients, and caregivers share similar understanding of changes in the healthcare system.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims at exploring three dimensions of care integration: a) understanding of integration; b) challenges and c) changes perceived as essential among three distinct stakeholder groups: providers, patients and caregivers.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted among 41 care providers (clinicians and administrators) and care consumers (patients and caregivers) in Singapore utilizing 29 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus group discussions. Study participants were selected by purposive, snowball sampling from various clinical settings. Data were transcribed, familiarized, coded and analyzed using a conceptual framework.

RESULTS

Understanding of care integration was generally lacking among patient and caregivers. Most of them focused on healthcare costs and accessibility of services. Providers characterized care integration in clinical process terms and had a more systems view of the concept. Most participants viewed resource constraints as a key challenge in integrating care. Additionally, providers expressed the need for patients and their families to play a greater role in managing their health. Individuals and the community are key components of an integrated care system in the future. Reliance on the healthcare system alone is not sustainable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients, caregivers and providers have varying degrees of understanding towards care integration. The success of engaging stakeholders on the ground to be active participants in the healthcare system integration process requires policymakers and healthcare leaders to increase patient engagement efforts and to better appreciate the challenges faced by the healthcare workers in the rapidly changing national and global healthcare landscape.

摘要

背景

整合照护已被公认为是改善有复杂需求患者照护质量的一种解决方案。随着新加坡日益发展并推广整合照护模式,尚不清楚提供者、患者及照护者对医疗系统变化是否有相似的理解。

目的

本研究旨在探索照护整合的三个维度:a)对照护整合的理解;b)挑战;以及c)三个不同利益相关者群体(提供者、患者和照护者)认为至关重要的变化。

方法

本定性研究在新加坡的41名照护提供者(临床医生和管理人员)以及照护消费者(患者和照护者)中进行,采用了29次半结构化访谈和2次焦点小组讨论。研究参与者通过目的抽样和滚雪球抽样从各种临床环境中选取。数据进行转录、熟悉、编码并使用概念框架进行分析。

结果

患者和照护者普遍缺乏对照护整合的理解。他们大多关注医疗费用和服务可及性。提供者从临床过程角度描述照护整合,对该概念有更系统的看法。大多数参与者将资源限制视为整合照护的关键挑战。此外,提供者表示患者及其家人需要在管理自身健康方面发挥更大作用。个人和社区是未来整合照护系统的关键组成部分。仅依赖医疗系统是不可持续的。

结论

患者、照护者和提供者对照护整合的理解程度各不相同。要让实地的利益相关者成为医疗系统整合过程中的积极参与者,政策制定者和医疗领导者需要加大患者参与力度,并更好地认识到在快速变化的国家和全球医疗环境中医疗工作者所面临的挑战。