Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):590-594. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Bearing surface wear and osteolysis are major factors limiting the durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Second generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and ceramics were introduced to THA for their excellent wear rates. However, there is little data comparing the wear rates of metal and ceramic heads on second generation HXLPE.
Sixty patients who received a noncemented THA with a 32- or 36-mm delta ceramic head were matched with 60 THAs with a 32- or 36-mm metal head based on gender, head size, follow-up, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score. Linear and volumetric wear rates were measured.
At mean 6-year follow-up, the mean linear wear rates were 0.012 mm/y (standard deviation [SD] 0.045; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.001-0.024) and 0.018 mm/y (SD 0.025; 95% CI 0.012-0.025) for the ceramic and metal groups, respectively (P = .724). The mean volumetric wear rates for the ceramic and metal head groups were 11.9 (SD 43.0; 95% CI 0.7-23.0) and 17.3 (SD 23.9; 95% CI 11.1-23.4), respectively. No significant differences were detectable in either the mean linear or volumetric wear rates (P = .380 and P = .398, respectively).
Second generation HXLPE had low wear rates and we were unable to detect a significant difference in wear rates with 32- or 36-mm metal and ceramic heads. We believe that this is due to the excellent tribological properties of second generation HXLPE. We continue to use ceramic as standard of care because of issues of trunnionosis with metal heads.
摩擦表面磨损和骨溶解是限制全髋关节置换术 (THA) 耐用性的主要因素。第二代退火高交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)和陶瓷被引入 THA,因其具有优异的磨损率。然而,关于第二代 HXLPE 上金属和陶瓷头的磨损率,数据很少。
根据性别、头大小、随访时间和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校活动评分,将 60 例接受非骨水泥 THA 且带有 32 或 36mm 陶瓷头的患者与 60 例接受 32 或 36mm 金属头的 THA 进行匹配。测量线性和体积磨损率。
在平均 6 年随访时,陶瓷组的平均线性磨损率为 0.012mm/y(标准差 [SD] 0.045;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.001-0.024)和金属组的 0.018mm/y(SD 0.025;95% CI 0.012-0.025)(P=.724)。陶瓷头和金属头组的平均体积磨损率分别为 11.9(SD 43.0;95% CI 0.7-23.0)和 17.3(SD 23.9;95% CI 11.1-23.4)。线性或体积磨损率均无显著差异(P=.380 和 P=.398)。
第二代 HXLPE 的磨损率较低,我们无法检测到 32 或 36mm 金属和陶瓷头之间的磨损率有显著差异。我们认为这是由于第二代 HXLPE 的优异摩擦学性能。由于金属头的臼顶问题,我们继续使用陶瓷作为标准治疗方法。