• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植受者的灾难准备:一项来自美国大型移植中心的基于问卷调查的队列研究

Disaster preparation in kidney transplant recipients: a questionnaire-based cohort study from a large United States transplant center
.

作者信息

Sharief Shimi, Freitas Daniel, Adey Deborah, Wiley James

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 2018 Apr;89(4):241-248. doi: 10.5414/CN109280.

DOI:10.5414/CN109280
PMID:29092741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6102562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few quantitative assessments have assessed disaster preparation in kidney transplant patients. This is a survey-based assessment of disaster preparedness of 200 patients at the University of California San Francisco, USA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients answered questionnaires assessing their level of preparedness as well as barriers to preparation. Preparedness was scored based on response to 7 questions. Univariate analyses compared participant characteristics extracted from the medical chart against three tertiles of preparedness: low (scores 0 - 2), medium (scores 3 - 4), and high (scores 5 - 7). California counties were coded and mapped by average preparedness scores.

RESULTS

Only 30% of patients were highly prepared for disasters. Participants were prepared with available medication for 2 weeks (78.5%) and least prepared in having a medical ID bracelet (13%). Significant minorities of patients (40% of patients or more) were unprepared with lists of medications, important phone numbers and disaster kits. Preparedness was not associated with demographic and clinical characteristics. Monterey County was the most prepared of the 31 California counties sampled (score of 4.25 out of 7).

CONCLUSION: All patients should be educated regarding disaster preparation. County and medical services should collaborate to address specialized populations in general preparedness planning.
.

摘要

背景

很少有定量评估对肾移植患者的灾难准备情况进行过评估。这是一项基于问卷调查的对美国加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校200名患者灾难准备情况的评估。

材料与方法

患者回答了评估其准备水平以及准备障碍的问卷。根据对7个问题的回答对准备情况进行评分。单因素分析将从病历中提取的参与者特征与准备情况的三个三分位数进行比较:低(得分0 - 2)、中(得分3 - 4)和高(得分5 - 7)。加利福尼亚各县按平均准备得分进行编码和绘图。

结果

只有30%的患者对灾难有充分准备。参与者准备了可供2周使用的药物(78.5%),而在佩戴医疗身份识别手环方面准备最不足(13%)。相当一部分患者(40%或更多)在准备药物清单、重要电话号码和灾难应急包方面没有做好准备。准备情况与人口统计学和临床特征无关。蒙特雷县是抽样的31个加利福尼亚县中准备最充分的(7分制下得分为4.25)。

结论

应向所有患者进行灾难准备方面的教育。县和医疗服务机构应合作,在总体准备计划中关注特殊人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/6e3c095e3642/clinnephrol-89-241-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/a0321d67aaaa/clinnephrol-89-241-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/a9dcdfa314c2/clinnephrol-89-241-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/6e3c095e3642/clinnephrol-89-241-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/a0321d67aaaa/clinnephrol-89-241-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/a9dcdfa314c2/clinnephrol-89-241-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bff4/6102562/6e3c095e3642/clinnephrol-89-241-03.jpg

相似文献

1
Disaster preparation in kidney transplant recipients: a questionnaire-based cohort study from a large United States transplant center
.肾移植受者的灾难准备:一项来自美国大型移植中心的基于问卷调查的队列研究
Clin Nephrol. 2018 Apr;89(4):241-248. doi: 10.5414/CN109280.
2
Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents.现役军人、退休人员、退伍军人及其家属的灾难准备情况。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000157. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Personal disaster preparedness of dialysis patients in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州透析患者的个人灾难准备情况。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;6(10):2478-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03590411. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Do not forget about transplant patients during disasters.灾难发生时,不要忘记移植患者。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2024 Nov 1;33(6):627-635. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000001021. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Factors related to the disaster preparedness of patients on haemodialysis from Sichuan, China, during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.中国四川血透患者在 COVID-19 期间的灾害准备相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70005. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70005.
6
Are general surgeons behind the curve when it comes to disaster preparedness training? A survey of general surgery and emergency medicine trainees in the United States by the Eastern Association for the Surgery for Trauma Committee on Disaster Preparedness.普通外科医生在灾难准备培训方面是否落后了?创伤外科学会东部协会对美国普通外科和急诊医学住院医师进行的一项调查。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):612-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265c9d9.
7
California NICU disaster preparedness.加州新生儿重症监护室灾难准备情况。
J Perinatol. 2020 Aug;40(8):1262-1266. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0676-3. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan.台湾地区灾难准备评估工具中文版的结构效度与信度
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(7-8):1132-43. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12721. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
9
A pilot registry of trauma surgeons willing and ready to respond to disasters.创伤外科医生志愿和随时准备应对灾害的试点登记册。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):393-396. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001751.
10
Who Participates in the Great ShakeOut? Why Audience Segmentation Is the Future of Disaster Preparedness Campaigns.谁参与了大震撼演习?为什么受众细分是灾难准备活动的未来。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111407.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping Review of Kidney Patients and Providers Perspectives on Disaster Management.肾脏疾病患者及医疗服务提供者对灾难管理看法的范围综述
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Mar 3;10(5):1346-1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.02.030. eCollection 2025 May.
2
A Roadmap for Disaster Risk Reduction and Management in Kidney Care: A Scoping Review and Content Analysis.肾脏护理中减少和管理灾害风险的路线图:一项范围审查和内容分析
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Feb 6;36(7):1363-79. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000635.
3
Factors related to the disaster preparedness of patients on haemodialysis from Sichuan, China, during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Geriatric Disaster Preparedness.老年群体的灾难准备
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):443-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005075. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
2
Disaster Preparedness and Awareness of Patients on Hemodialysis after Hurricane Sandy.飓风桑迪过后血液透析患者的灾难准备与认知
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):1389-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10181014. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
Diabetes care: After the Great East Japan Earthquake.糖尿病护理:东日本大地震之后。
中国四川血透患者在 COVID-19 期间的灾害准备相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70005. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70005.
4
Disasters and kidney care: pitfalls and solutions.灾难与肾脏护理:问题与解决方案。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023 Oct;19(10):672-686. doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00743-8. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
5
Kidney transplantation during mass disasters - from COVID-19 to other catastrophes A Consensus Statement by the DESCARTES Working Group and Ethics Committee of the ERA.重大灾害期间的肾脏移植 - 从 COVID-19 到其他灾难 DES-CARTES 工作组和 ERA 伦理委员会的共识声明。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):300–308. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac251. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Extreme snowfall and residential care: A case report of a 2-year-old girl with heart failure.极端降雪与住院护理:一名两岁心力衰竭女童的病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2020 Mar 20;8(6):950-954. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2633. eCollection 2020 Jun.
J Diabetes Investig. 2013 Jan 29;4(1):97-102. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
4
Medication compliance in renal transplant patients during the Great East Japan Earthquake.
Transplant Proc. 2014;46(2):610-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.039.
5
Predictors of metabolic control in children with Type 1 diabetes: the impact of Hurricane Katrina in a prospective study.1 型糖尿病患儿代谢控制的预测因素:前瞻性研究中卡特里娜飓风的影响。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;88(3):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
6
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
7
Disaster preparedness in pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus.1型糖尿病患儿的灾难准备
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124(5):e973-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3648. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
8
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
9
Natural disasters and older US adults with disabilities: implications for evacuation.自然灾害与美国残疾老年人:对疏散的影响
Disasters. 2007 Mar;31(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.00339.x.
10
A Katrina experience: lessons learned.卡特里娜飓风经历:汲取的教训。
Am J Med. 2006 Nov;119(11):986-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.021.