• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁参与了大震撼演习?为什么受众细分是灾难准备活动的未来。

Who Participates in the Great ShakeOut? Why Audience Segmentation Is the Future of Disaster Preparedness Campaigns.

机构信息

Center for Public Health and Disasters, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

The Norman Lear Center, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111407.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14111407
PMID:29149064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5708046/
Abstract

: In 2008, the Southern California Earthquake Center in collaboration with the U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program launched the first annual Great ShakeOut, the largest earthquake preparedness drill in the history of the United States. : We collected online survey data from 2052 campaign registrants to assess how people participated, whether audience segments shared behavioral patterns, and whether these segments were associated with five social cognitive factors targeted by the ShakeOut campaign. : Participants clustered into four behavioral patterns. The Minimal cluster had low participation in all activities (range: 0-39% participation). The Basic Drill cluster only participated in the drop, cover and hold drill (100% participation). The Community-Oriented cluster, involved in the drill (100%) and other interpersonal activities including attending disaster planning meetings (74%), was positively associated with interpersonal communication (β = 0.169), self-efficacy (β = 0.118), outcome efficacy (β = 0.110), and knowledge about disaster preparedness (β = 0.151). The Interactive and Games cluster, which participated in the drill (79%) and two online earthquake preparedness games (53% and 75%), was positively associated with all five social cognitive factors studied. : Our results support audience segmentation approaches to engaging the public, which address the strengths and weaknesses of different segments. Offering games may help "gamers" gain competencies required to prepare for disasters. Targeting the highly active Community-Oriented cluster for leadership roles could help build community resilience by encouraging others to become more involved in disaster planning. We propose that the days of single, national education campaigns without local variation should end.

摘要

2008 年,南加州地震中心与美国地质调查局地震灾害项目合作,发起了第一次年度“大震出逃”,这是美国历史上最大的地震准备演习。我们从 2052 名活动注册者那里收集了在线调查数据,以评估人们的参与方式、受众群体是否存在行为模式、以及这些群体是否与“大震出逃”活动针对的五个社会认知因素有关。参与者分为四种行为模式。最小参与模式的人在所有活动中的参与度都很低(参与率范围:0-39%)。基本演练模式的人只参与了蹲下、掩护和抓住演练(100%参与)。社区导向模式的人,参与演练(100%)和其他人际活动,包括参加灾难规划会议(74%),与人际沟通(β=0.169)、自我效能(β=0.118)、结果效能(β=0.110)和灾难准备知识(β=0.151)呈正相关。互动和游戏模式的人,参与了演练(79%)和两个在线地震准备游戏(53%和 75%),与我们研究的五个社会认知因素都呈正相关。我们的研究结果支持针对不同群体的受众细分方法,这些方法解决了不同群体的优势和弱点。提供游戏可能有助于“游戏者”获得应对灾难所需的能力。针对高度活跃的社区导向群体,赋予他们领导角色,通过鼓励其他人更多地参与灾难规划,可以帮助建立社区的复原力。我们建议,结束没有地方差异的单一、全国性教育运动的日子应该到来了。

相似文献

1
Who Participates in the Great ShakeOut? Why Audience Segmentation Is the Future of Disaster Preparedness Campaigns.谁参与了大震撼演习?为什么受众细分是灾难准备活动的未来。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111407.
2
Who Participates in Building Disaster Resilient Communities: A Cluster-Analytic Approach.谁参与建设抗灾社区:一种聚类分析方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):37-46. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000387.
3
Earthquake Preparedness and Knowledge of Recommended Self-Protective Actions: A Survey of Nursing Students.地震准备和推荐的自我保护措施知识:护理学生的调查。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr;16(2):495-499. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.422. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Community engagement and pediatric disaster readiness in a large urban disaster resource hospital network: the case of "The Great California ShakeOut".大型城市灾难资源医院网络中的社区参与和儿科灾难准备:以“加利福尼亚大地震演练”为例。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Jun;6(2):182-6. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.24.
5
An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: a cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal.心理健康与灾害准备的综合方法:尼泊尔地震灾区的群组比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z.
6
People's perspectives and expectations on preparedness against earthquakes: Tehran case study.人们对地震防备的看法与期望:德黑兰案例研究
J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jun;2(2):85-91. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v2i2.25.
7
Social Capital Enhanced Disaster Preparedness and Health Consultations after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Power Station Accident.2011 年东日本大地震与核电厂事故后的社会资本增进备灾与健康谘询。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 14;15(3):516. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030516.
8
Rural Community Disaster Preparedness and Risk Perception in Trujillo, Peru.秘鲁特鲁希略农村社区的灾难防备与风险认知
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):387-392. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006380. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
9
Resilience of an Earthquake-Stricken Rural Community in Southwest China: Correlation with Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts.中国西南地区一个遭受地震的农村社区的韧性:与减轻灾害风险工作的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(3):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030407.
10
The 2015 Nepal earthquake disaster: lessons learned one year on.2015年尼泊尔地震灾难:一年后的经验教训
Public Health. 2017 Apr;145:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.031. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening the relationship between community resilience and health emergency communication: a systematic review.加强社区复原力与卫生应急通信之间的关系:一项系统综述
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;2(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00112-y.
2
Factors related to earthquake preparedness of households based on social-cognitive theory constructs: A systematic review.基于社会认知理论构建的家庭地震准备相关因素:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:987418. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.987418. eCollection 2023.
3
The Factors Affecting Volunteers' Willingness to Participate in Disaster Preparedness.影响志愿者参与备灾意愿的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084141.
4
Rural Households' Livelihood Capital, Risk Perception, and Willingness to Purchase Earthquake Disaster Insurance: Evidence from Southwestern China.农村家庭生计资本、风险感知与地震灾害保险购买意愿——来自中国西南地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 23;15(7):1319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071319.
5
Resilience of an Earthquake-Stricken Rural Community in Southwest China: Correlation with Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts.中国西南地区一个遭受地震的农村社区的韧性:与减轻灾害风险工作的相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(3):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030407.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security.增强社区抗灾能力:提升国家卫生安全的前进之路。
Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):6. eCollection 2011 Spring.
2
Who Participates in Building Disaster Resilient Communities: A Cluster-Analytic Approach.谁参与建设抗灾社区:一种聚类分析方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):37-46. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000387.
3
Using the Precaution Adoption Process model to describe a disaster preparedness intervention among low-income Latinos.运用预防采纳过程模型描述针对低收入拉丁裔群体的备灾干预措施。
Health Educ Res. 2014 Apr;29(2):272-83. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt109. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
4
Building community disaster resilience: perspectives from a large urban county department of public health.建设社区灾害韧性:来自一个大型城市县公共卫生部门的观点。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1190-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301268. Epub 2013 May 16.
5
Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness.有关地震灾害和家庭准备的显著信念。
Risk Anal. 2013 Sep;33(9):1710-27. doi: 10.1111/risa.12014. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
6
Household emergency preparedness: a literature review.家庭应急准备:文献综述。
J Community Health. 2012 Jun;37(3):725-33. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9488-x.
7
Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards.传达针对恐怖主义和其他危害的可采取行动的风险。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):601-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Theory-based approaches to understanding public emergency preparedness: implications for effective health and risk communication.基于理论的公众应急准备理解方法:对有效健康和风险沟通的启示。
J Health Commun. 2010 Jun;15(4):428-44. doi: 10.1080/10810731003753083.
9
Improving Latino disaster preparedness using social networks.利用社交网络提高拉丁裔的灾害准备能力。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.022.
10
Predictors of Emergency Preparedness and Compliance.应急准备和合规性的预测因素。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Jul 8. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181a9c6c5.