• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抱歉,并非抱歉:多重语音线索在提示两个词义差异方面的独立作用。

Sorry, Not Sorry: The independent role of multiple phonetic cues in signaling the difference between two word meanings.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Canada.

University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada.

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2022 Mar;65(1):143-172. doi: 10.1177/0023830921988975. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1177/0023830921988975
PMID:33506740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8886304/
Abstract

We examine the use of multiple subphonemic differences distinguishing homophones in production and perception, through a case study focusing on the distinction between two polysemous senses of the English word "sorry" (apology vs. attention-seeking). An analysis of production data from voice actors revealed significant and substantial durational differences between the two meanings. Tokens expressing an apology were longer than attention-seeking tokens, and the situational intensity of the context also independently affected duration. When asked to identify the meaning in a two-way forced-choice task after hearing each token spliced out of its context, listeners were above chance (64.7% accuracy) in identifying the intended meaning, and their responses were significantly correlated with the duration, intensity, and intonation contour (but not mean F0) of the productions. In a second perception task, listeners heard tokens of "sorry" that had been systematically manipulated to vary in duration, intensity, and intonation contour, with responses indicating that each of these dimensions played an independent role in listeners' judgments. The results highlight the importance of broadening the scope of research on the use of subphonemic detail during lexical access and considering a wider range of lexical and non-lexical factors that condition variability on multiple acoustic dimensions, in order to work toward a more accurate picture of the systematic variability available in the input and tracked by listeners.

摘要

我们通过一个案例研究来考察在生产和感知中使用多个次音位差异来区分同音词的情况,该案例研究集中于英语单词“sorry”(道歉与寻求关注)两个多义词义之间的区别。对配音演员的生产数据的分析揭示了这两个含义之间存在显著且实质性的时长差异。表达歉意的词比寻求关注的词要长,并且上下文的情境强度也独立地影响时长。当被要求在听到每个从上下文中拼接出来的音位后,在双向强制选择任务中识别其含义时,听众的识别准确率(64.7%)高于随机水平,并且他们的反应与音位的时长、强度和语调轮廓(但不是平均 F0)显著相关。在第二个感知任务中,听众听到了“sorry”的音位,这些音位在时长、强度和语调轮廓上都经过了系统的操纵,结果表明这些维度中的每一个都在听众的判断中发挥了独立的作用。研究结果强调了在词汇访问过程中拓宽对次音位细节的使用研究范围的重要性,并考虑更广泛的词汇和非词汇因素,这些因素会在多个声学维度上影响可变性,以更准确地了解输入中可用的系统性可变性并由听众跟踪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/696364d5d941/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/80425d395a5a/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/5ebe2338f583/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/9672a0c5e8a3/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/0baad1f25e8b/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/d48a342b1fdd/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/3e3060e3380a/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/696364d5d941/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/80425d395a5a/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/5ebe2338f583/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/9672a0c5e8a3/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/0baad1f25e8b/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/d48a342b1fdd/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/3e3060e3380a/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042d/8886304/696364d5d941/10.1177_0023830921988975-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Sorry, Not Sorry: The independent role of multiple phonetic cues in signaling the difference between two word meanings.抱歉,并非抱歉:多重语音线索在提示两个词义差异方面的独立作用。
Lang Speech. 2022 Mar;65(1):143-172. doi: 10.1177/0023830921988975. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Production of sentence-final intonation contours by hearing-impaired children.听力受损儿童的句末语调轮廓生成。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Apr;43(2):441-55. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4302.441.
3
Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.对第二语言的体验会影响语音分割中基频的使用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181709. eCollection 2017.
4
Dutch listeners' perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach.荷兰听众对英语词汇重音的感知:一种线索加权方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Jun;149(6):3703. doi: 10.1121/10.0005086.
5
Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.母语为英语的英语听众和韩国英语听众对歧义句的韵律线索加权处理。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):158. doi: 10.1121/10.0009171.
6
Individual variability in subcortical neural encoding shapes phonetic cue weighting.皮质下神经编码的个体变异性塑造了语音线索的权重。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37212-y.
7
Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners.爱沙尼亚听众和英国听众对突出性的感知。
Lang Speech. 1992 Oct-Dec;35 ( Pt 4):419-34. doi: 10.1177/002383099203500403.
8
Intonation and talker variability in the discrimination of Spanish lexical stress contrasts by Spanish, German and French listeners.西班牙语、德语和法语使用者对西班牙语词汇重音对比的辨别中的语调差异和说话人变异性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Oct;142(4):2419. doi: 10.1121/1.5008849.
9
Lexical support for phonetic perception during nonnative spoken word recognition.非母语口语单词识别过程中语音感知的词汇支持
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1746-52. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0847-y.
10
The interdependence of tonal and durational cues in the perception of rhythmic groups.节奏组感知中音调与时长线索的相互依存关系。
Phonetica. 2010;67(4):219-42. doi: 10.1159/000324132. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Prosody leaks into the memories of words.韵律会渗透到单词的记忆中。
Cognition. 2021 May;210:104601. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104601. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production.语音线索在感知和产生中的权重。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;11(2):e1521. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1521. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
3
Effects of lexical ambiguity, frequency, and acoustic details in auditory perception.词汇歧义、词频及声学细节对听觉感知的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):323-343. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1604-x.
4
Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.同音异形词生成中的词频效应:一项诱发研究。
Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0023830917737108. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?双语认知优势:是否存在发表偏倚?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0956797614557866. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
6
Word informativity influences acoustic duration: effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation.词汇信息量影响语音时长:语境可预测性对词汇表征的影响
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):140-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
7
The truth about chickens and bats: ambiguity avoidance distinguishes types of polysemy.鸡和蝙蝠的真相:避免歧义区分多义词的类型。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1354-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797612472205. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon.心理词汇中的语音抽象
Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov 12;30(6):1113-26. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_79.
9
Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion.非言语情感发声中的感知线索。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2251-72. doi: 10.1080/17470211003721642. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
10
An intonational cue to word segmentation in phonemically identical sequences.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):775-87. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.775.