Steel Emily J, Buchanan Ricky, Layton Natasha, Wilson Erin
TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Independent Internet Professional and Disability Activist, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Occup Ther Int. 2017 Jan 12;2017:5612843. doi: 10.1155/2017/5612843. eCollection 2017.
Assistive technology was once a specialised field of practice, involving products designed for populations with specific impairments or functional goals. In Australia, occupational therapists have, at times, functioned as gatekeepers to public funding, prescribing products from a predefined list. An expanding range of accessible mainstream products available via international and online markets has changed the meaning and application of assistive technology for many people with disability. In the policy context of consumer choice and cost-effectiveness, have occupational therapists been left behind? This paper describes the change in context for access to assistive technology resulting in expanded possibilities for participation and inclusion. A case study of environmental control systems is used to explore the overlap of mainstream and assistive products and the funding and services to support their uptake. The analysis describes a future policy and practice context in which assistive technology includes a spectrum of products decoupled from access to independent advice and support services. A broader scope of occupational therapy practice has potential to enhance the occupational rights of people with disability and the efficiency and effectiveness of assistive technology provision.
辅助技术曾经是一个专门的实践领域,涉及为有特定损伤或功能目标的人群设计的产品。在澳大利亚,职业治疗师有时充当公共资金的把关人,从预先确定的清单中开出处方产品。通过国际和在线市场获得的越来越多的无障碍主流产品,改变了许多残疾人对辅助技术的理解和应用。在消费者选择和成本效益的政策背景下,职业治疗师是否已经落后了?本文描述了辅助技术获取背景的变化,这为参与和融入创造了更多可能性。通过一个环境控制系统的案例研究,探讨主流产品与辅助产品的重叠以及支持其使用的资金和服务。分析描述了一个未来的政策和实践背景,在这个背景下,辅助技术包括一系列与获得独立咨询和支持服务脱钩的产品。更广泛的职业治疗实践范围有可能增强残疾人的职业权利以及辅助技术提供的效率和效果。