• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用扩散加权成像对包括筛状模式在内的前列腺癌分级进行鉴别时的优化值选择。

Optimized -value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging.

作者信息

Hurrell Sarah L, McGarry Sean D, Kaczmarowski Amy, Iczkowski Kenneth A, Jacobsohn Kenneth, Hohenwalter Mark D, Hall William A, See William A, Banerjee Anjishnu, Charles David K, Nevalainen Marja T, Mackinnon Alexander C, LaViolette Peter S

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Radiology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.

Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Biophysics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):011004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004
PMID:29098169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5658575/
Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology-pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common -value combinations for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty-nine patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were recruited for MP-MRI prior to surgery. Diffusion imaging was collected with seven -values, and ADC was calculated. Excised prostates were sliced in the same orientation as the MRI using 3-D printed slicing jigs. Whole-mount slides were digitized and annotated by a pathologist. Annotated samples were aligned to the MRI, and ADC values were extracted from annotated peripheral zone (PZ) regions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine accuracy of tissue type discrimination and optimal ADC -value combination. ADC significantly discriminates Gleason (G) G4-5 cancer from G3 and other prostate tissue types. The optimal -values for discriminating high from low-grade and noncancerous tissue in the PZ are 50 and 2000, followed closely by 100 to 2000 and 0 to 2000. Optimal ADC cut-offs are presented for dichotomized discrimination of tissue types according to each -value combination. Selection of -values affects the sensitivity and specificity of ADC for discrimination of prostate cancer.

摘要

多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI),包括扩散加权成像,常用于诊断前列腺癌。这项放射学-病理学研究将前列腺癌的分级和形态与计算表观扩散系数(ADC)的常见值组合相关联。39例行根治性前列腺切除术的患者在手术前接受了MP-MRI检查。采用7个值进行扩散成像,并计算ADC。使用3D打印切片夹具将切除的前列腺切成与MRI相同的方向。病理学家对整装切片进行数字化处理并标注。将标注后的样本与MRI对齐,并从标注的外周带(PZ)区域提取ADC值。进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以确定组织类型鉴别和最佳ADC值组合的准确性。ADC能显著区分Gleason(G)4-5级癌与G3级癌及其他前列腺组织类型。在PZ中区分高级别与低级别及非癌组织的最佳值分别为50和2000,紧随其后的是100至2000和0至2000。根据每个值组合给出了用于组织类型二分法鉴别的最佳ADC临界值。值的选择会影响ADC鉴别前列腺癌的敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/92a843d1c5db/JMI-005-011004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/6430a945e31e/JMI-005-011004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/0767e5fd8fc8/JMI-005-011004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/92a843d1c5db/JMI-005-011004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/6430a945e31e/JMI-005-011004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/0767e5fd8fc8/JMI-005-011004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/5658575/92a843d1c5db/JMI-005-011004-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimized -value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging.使用扩散加权成像对包括筛状模式在内的前列腺癌分级进行鉴别时的优化值选择。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):011004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
2
Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth.以全层前列腺病理为金标准,比较患者体内 Gleason 4 融合性腺泡与筛状腺泡之间的扩散受限情况。
Tomography. 2022 Mar 2;8(2):635-643. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020053.
3
Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.通过扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别移行带前列腺癌病变
Eur J Radiol Open. 2017 Sep 29;4:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2017.08.003. eCollection 2017.
4
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.
5
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer.多参数磁共振成像鉴别低级别与高级别前列腺癌
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):490-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000157.
6
Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.3.0T MRI 下表观扩散系数与前列腺癌外周带 Gleason 分级的关系。
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):453-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091409.
7
Quantified analysis of histological components and architectural patterns of gleason grades in apparent diffusion coefficient restricted areas upon diffusion weighted MRI for peripheral or transition zone cancer locations.对周围或移行区癌灶弥散加权 MRI 受限区域内 Gleason 分级的组织学成分和结构模式进行定量分析。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Dec;46(6):1786-1796. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25716. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.前列腺良性中央区的表观扩散系数值:与低级别和高级别前列腺癌的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):331-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14221.
9
Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.基于肿瘤表观弥散系数体积直方图分析联合临床信息对前列腺癌进行风险分层:一项初步研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):556-564. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26235. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of intensity normalization methods in prostate, brain, and breast cancer multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.前列腺、脑和乳腺癌多参数磁共振成像中强度归一化方法的比较
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 7;15:1433444. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1433444. eCollection 2025.
2
Quantitative Prostate MRI, From the Special Series on Quantitative Imaging.定量前列腺磁共振成像,来自定量成像特刊。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Oct 2. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31715.
3
Technical note: hydrogel-based mimics of prostate cancer with matched relaxation, diffusion and kurtosis for validating multi-parametric MRI.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomic Profiles Predict Patient Prognosis in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Before Therapy.基于磁共振成像的放射组学特征预测新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者治疗前的预后。
Tomography. 2016 Sep;2(3):223-228. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00250.
2
Progressing Bevacizumab-Induced Diffusion Restriction Is Associated with Coagulative Necrosis Surrounded by Viable Tumor and Decreased Overall Survival in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.贝伐单抗诱导的进行性扩散受限与复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者中被存活肿瘤包围的凝固性坏死及总生存期缩短有关。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):2201-2208. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4898. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
技术说明:用于验证多参数 MRI 的具有匹配弛豫、扩散和峰度的前列腺癌水凝胶模拟物。
Med Phys. 2024 May;51(5):3590-3596. doi: 10.1002/mp.16908. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Quantitative Histomorphometric Features of Prostate Cancer Predict Patients Who Biochemically Recur Following Prostatectomy.前列腺癌的定量组织形态计量学特征可预测前列腺切除术后生化复发的患者。
Lab Invest. 2023 Dec;103(12):100269. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100269. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features Predict Prostate Cancer Presence and Eventual Biochemical Recurrence.T2加权磁共振成像的影像组学特征可预测前列腺癌的存在及最终生化复发。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;15(18):4437. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184437.
6
Test-retest repeatability of ADC in prostate using the multi b-Value VERDICT acquisition.采用多 b 值 VERDICT 采集法测量前列腺 ADC 的重测重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 May;162:110782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110782. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Comparison of a machine and deep learning model for automated tumor annotation on digitized whole slide prostate cancer histology.机器和深度学习模型在数字化全切片前列腺癌组织学肿瘤自动标注上的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0278084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278084. eCollection 2023.
8
Lesion-specific 3D-printed moulds for image-guided tissue multi-sampling of ovarian tumours: A prospective pilot study.用于卵巢肿瘤图像引导组织多样本采集的病变特异性3D打印模具:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 13;13:1085874. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1085874. eCollection 2023.
9
Homologous point transformer for multi-modality prostate image registration.用于多模态前列腺图像配准的同源点变换器
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Dec 1;8:e1155. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1155. eCollection 2022.
10
Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning.通过机器学习弥合前列腺放射学与病理学之间的差距。
Med Phys. 2022 Aug;49(8):5160-5181. doi: 10.1002/mp.15777. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
Diffusion in prostate cancer detection on a 3T scanner: How many b-values are needed?
3T磁共振成像仪在前列腺癌检测中的扩散加权成像:需要多少个b值?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Sep;44(3):601-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25206. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.利用定量扩散加权成像(DWI)与动态对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)联合评估前列腺癌侵袭性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):756-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14912. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.与扩散加权成像相比,T2*弛豫时间在外周带癌侵袭性检测和评估中的应用
Clin Radiol. 2016 Apr;71(4):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Detection of Prostate Cancer: Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed Using Registered Correlative Histopathology.前列腺癌的检测:使用配准相关组织病理学开发的定量多参数磁共振成像模型
Radiology. 2016 Jun;279(3):805-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151089. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
9
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.PI-RADS前列腺影像报告和数据系统:2015版,第2版
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.一种当代前列腺癌分级系统:格里森评分的有效替代方案。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.