Suppr超能文献

引导联盟如何促进医院积极文化变革:一项纵向混合方法干预研究。

How guiding coalitions promote positive culture change in hospitals: a longitudinal mixed methods interventional study.

机构信息

Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA.

Yale School of Public Health, Global Health Leadership Institute, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):218-225. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006574. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality collaboratives are widely endorsed as a potentially effective method for translating and spreading best practices for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care. Nevertheless, hospital success in improving performance through participation in collaboratives varies markedly. We sought to understand what distinguished hospitals that succeeded in shifting culture and reducing 30-day risk-standardised mortality rate (RSMR) after AMI through their participation in the Leadership Saves Lives (LSL) collaborative.

PROCEDURES

We conducted a longitudinal, mixed methods intervention study of 10 hospitals over a 2-year period; data included surveys of 223 individuals (response rates 83%-94% depending on wave) and 393 in-depth interviews with clinical and management staff most engaged with the LSL intervention in the 10 hospitals. We measured change in culture and RSMR, and key aspects of working related to team membership, turnover, level of participation and approaches to conflict management.

MAIN FINDINGS

The six hospitals that experienced substantial culture change and greater reductions in RSMR demonstrated distinctions in: (1) effective inclusion of staff from different disciplines and levels in the organisational hierarchy in the team guiding improvement efforts (referred to as the 'guiding coalition' in each hospital); (2) authentic participation in the work of the guiding coalition; and (3) distinct patterns of managing conflict. Guiding coalition size and turnover were not associated with success (p values>0.05). In the six hospitals that experienced substantial positive culture change, staff indicated that the LSL learnings were already being applied to other improvement efforts.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals that were most successful in a national quality collaborative to shift hospital culture and reduce RSMR showed distinct patterns in membership diversity, authentic participation and capacity for conflict management.

摘要

背景

质量协作被广泛认为是将急性心肌梗死(AMI)护理的最佳实践转化和推广的一种潜在有效方法。然而,医院通过参与协作来提高绩效的成功率差异很大。我们试图了解通过参与领导力拯救生命(LSL)协作,哪些因素使医院在改变文化和降低 AMI 后 30 天风险标准化死亡率(RSMR)方面取得成功。

程序

我们对 10 家医院进行了为期 2 年的纵向、混合方法干预研究;数据包括对 223 名个人(根据波次,响应率为 83%-94%)的调查和对与 10 家医院中 LSL 干预措施最相关的临床和管理人员的 393 次深入访谈。我们测量了文化和 RSMR 的变化,以及与团队成员身份、人员流动、参与程度和冲突管理方法相关的工作的关键方面。

主要发现

经历了文化的重大变化和 RSMR 更大幅度降低的六家医院在以下方面存在差异:(1)有效地将不同学科和组织层次的员工纳入指导改进工作的团队(在每家医院中称为“指导联盟”);(2)在指导联盟的工作中真正参与;(3)冲突管理的独特模式。指导联盟的规模和人员流动与成功无关(p 值>0.05)。在经历了重大积极文化变革的六家医院中,员工表示 LSL 的学习成果已经应用于其他改进工作。

主要结论

在改变医院文化和降低 RSMR 的全国质量协作中最成功的医院在成员多样性、真正参与和冲突管理能力方面表现出独特的模式。

相似文献

7
Diversity, Inclusive Leadership, and Health Outcomes.多样性、包容型领导力与健康结果。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):266-268. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2020.12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验