• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引领实践变革:“纵向预 briefing”如何培育和维持现场模拟项目

Leading change in practice: how "longitudinal prebriefing" nurtures and sustains in situ simulation programs.

作者信息

Eller Susan, Rudolph Jenny, Barwick Stephanie, Janssens Sarah, Bajaj Komal

机构信息

Immersive Learning and Learning Spaces, Center for Immersive and Simulation-Based Learning, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, LK311B, USA.

Surgery, Health Professions Education, Center for Medical Simulation, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital-Institute for Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Jan 21;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00243-6.

DOI:10.1186/s41077-023-00243-6
PMID:36681827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9862849/
Abstract

In situ simulation (ISS) programs deliver patient safety benefits to healthcare systems, however, face many challenges in both implementation and sustainability. Prebriefing is conducted immediately prior to a simulation activity to enhance engagement with the learning activity, but is not sufficient to embed and sustain an ISS program. Longer-term and broader change leadership is required to engage colleagues, secure time and resources, and sustain an in situ simulation program. No framework currently exists to describe this process for ISS programs. This manuscript presents a framework derived from the analysis of three successful ISS program implementations across different hospital systems. We describe eight change leadership steps adapted from Kotter's change management theory, used to sustainably implement the ISS programs analyzed. These steps include the following: (1) identifying goals of key stakeholders, (2) engaging a multi-professional team, (3) creating a shared vision, (4) communicating the vision effectively, (5) energizing participants and enabling program participation, (6) identifying and celebrating early success, (7) closing the loop on early program successes, and (8) embedding simulation in organizational culture and operations. We describe this process as a "longitudinal prebrief," a framework which provides a step-by-step guide to engage colleagues and sustain successful implementation of ISS.

摘要

情景模拟(ISS)项目为医疗系统带来了患者安全效益,然而,在实施和可持续性方面面临诸多挑战。预演在模拟活动即将开始前立即进行,以增强对学习活动的参与度,但不足以嵌入并维持一个ISS项目。需要更长期、更广泛的变革领导力来促使同事参与、确保时间和资源,并维持情景模拟项目。目前尚无框架来描述ISS项目的这一过程。本文介绍了一个通过对不同医院系统中三个成功的ISS项目实施情况进行分析而得出的框架。我们描述了从科特变革管理理论改编而来的八个变革领导步骤,用于可持续地实施所分析的ISS项目。这些步骤包括:(1)确定关键利益相关者的目标;(2)吸引多专业团队参与;(3)创建共同愿景;(4)有效传达愿景;(5)激励参与者并促进项目参与;(6)识别并庆祝早期成功;(7)巩固早期项目成功;(8)将模拟融入组织文化和运营。我们将这一过程描述为“纵向预演”,这是一个为促使同事参与并维持ISS的成功实施提供逐步指导的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/291a/9862849/92527af9a5fa/41077_2023_243_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/291a/9862849/92527af9a5fa/41077_2023_243_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/291a/9862849/92527af9a5fa/41077_2023_243_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Leading change in practice: how "longitudinal prebriefing" nurtures and sustains in situ simulation programs.引领实践变革:“纵向预 briefing”如何培育和维持现场模拟项目
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Jan 21;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00243-6.
2
A Guide for Medical Educators: How to Design and Implement In Situ Simulation in an Academic Emergency Department to Support Interprofessional Education.医学教育工作者指南:如何在学术性急诊科设计并实施现场模拟以支持跨专业教育。
Cureus. 2021 May 11;13(5):e14965. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14965.
3
Implementation of a pediatric in situ, train-the-trainer simulation program in general emergency departments.在普通急诊科实施儿科现场培训培训师模拟项目。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 30;7(1):e10843. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10843. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 9: Sustaining interprofessional simulation using change management principles.跨专业教育与实践指南第9号:运用变革管理原则维持跨专业模拟
J Interprof Care. 2018 Nov;32(6):771-778. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1511525. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
7
Mento's change model in teaching competency-based medical education.门托的教学能力本位医学教育变革模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1896-0.
8
A qualitative evaluation of medication management services in six Minnesota health systems.明尼苏达州六个医疗系统中药物管理服务的定性评估。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5):307-14. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150212.
9
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
'Everybody's voice is important': using translational simulation as a component of change management.“每个人的声音都很重要”:将转化模拟作为变革管理的一个组成部分
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Jul 5;10(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00364-0.
2
Readiness planning: how to go beyond "buy-in" to achieve curricular success and front-line performance.准备规划:如何超越“获得支持”以实现课程成功和一线表现。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Dec 23;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00317-z.
3
Implementing the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Tool for Training Medical Faculty.

本文引用的文献

1
Taking simulation out of its "safe container"-exploring the bidirectional impacts of psychological safety and simulation in an emergency department.将模拟从其“安全容器”中解放出来——探索心理安全与急诊科模拟的双向影响。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Feb 5;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00201-8.
2
Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation.产科安全的七个特征:基于多地点民族志和利益攸关方协商的框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):444-456. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010988. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare.
在医学教师培训中实施医疗保健模拟汇报评估(DASH)工具。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 12;16(9):e69290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69290. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Leaders' experiences of embedding a simulation-based education programme in a teaching hospital: an interview study informed by normalisation process theory.领导者在教学医院实施基于模拟的教育项目的经验:一项基于规范化过程理论的访谈研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 May 20;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00294-3.
5
Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety.再探转化性模拟:模拟对医疗质量与安全贡献的演进概念模型
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 May 8;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00291-6.
6
Faculty development for translational simulation: a qualitative study of current practice.转化模拟的教师发展:对当前实践的定性研究。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Nov 2;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00265-0.
7
Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).脓毒症与临床模拟:新在何处?(以及旧有情况)
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 8;13(10):1475. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101475.
8
Recommendations for embedding simulation in health services.将模拟技术融入医疗服务的建议。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Oct 6;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00262-3.
利用临床模拟研究如何提高医疗保健的质量和安全性。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 4;6(2):87-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000370. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework.理论、理论框架和概念框架的区别。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):989-994. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075.
5
Improving the relational aspects of trauma care through translational simulation.通过转化模拟改善创伤护理中的关系层面。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2019 May 21;4:10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-019-0100-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 9: Sustaining interprofessional simulation using change management principles.跨专业教育与实践指南第9号:运用变革管理原则维持跨专业模拟
J Interprof Care. 2018 Nov;32(6):771-778. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1511525. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
"No-Go Considerations" for In Situ Simulation Safety.原位模拟安全的“禁忌考虑因素”
Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3):221-224. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000301.
8
Translational simulation: not 'where?' but 'why?' A functional view of in situ simulation.转化模拟:不是“何处?”而是“为何?”——对现场模拟的功能性观点。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Oct 19;2:20. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0052-3. eCollection 2017.
9
How guiding coalitions promote positive culture change in hospitals: a longitudinal mixed methods interventional study.引导联盟如何促进医院积极文化变革:一项纵向混合方法干预研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):218-225. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006574. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Role of in-situ simulation for training in healthcare: opportunities and challenges.现场模拟在医疗保健培训中的作用:机遇与挑战。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):755-760. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000514.