• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A multi-dataset time-reversal approach to clinical trial placebo response and the relationship to natural variability in epilepsy.多数据集时间反转方法在临床试验安慰剂反应及与癫痫自然变异性的关系研究。
Seizure. 2017 Dec;53:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.发作频率的自然变异性:对试验和安慰剂的影响。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 May;162:106306. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106306. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的深部脑刺激和皮层刺激
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 18;7(7):CD008497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008497.pub3.
4
Does accounting for seizure frequency variability increase clinical trial power?考虑癫痫发作频率的变异性是否会提高临床试验效能?
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Nov;137:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的深部脑刺激和皮层刺激
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17(6):CD008497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008497.pub2.
6
An estimate of placebo effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in epilepsy.癫痫重复经颅磁刺激的安慰剂效应估计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Feb;20(2):355-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
7
Quantifying and controlling the impact of regression to the mean on randomized controlled trials in epilepsy.量化和控制回归均值对癫痫随机对照试验的影响。
Epilepsia. 2023 Oct;64(10):2635-2643. doi: 10.1111/epi.17730. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
8
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.经颅磁刺激治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 15;4(4):CD011025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011025.pub3.
9
Confusing placebo effect with natural history in epilepsy: A big data approach.癫痫中安慰剂效应与自然病史的混淆:一种大数据方法。
Ann Neurol. 2015 Sep;78(3):329-36. doi: 10.1002/ana.24470. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Statistical efficiency of patient data in randomized clinical trials of epilepsy treatments.癫痫治疗随机临床试验中患者数据的统计效率。
Epilepsia. 2020 Aug;61(8):1659-1667. doi: 10.1111/epi.16609. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Does missing medication acutely change seizure risk? A prospective study.漏服药物会急性改变癫痫发作风险吗?一项前瞻性研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 7:2025.06.06.25329144. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.06.25329144.
2
Inductive reasoning with large language models: A simulated randomized controlled trial for epilepsy.大语言模型的归纳推理:一项癫痫模拟随机对照试验
Epilepsy Res. 2025 Mar;211:107532. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107532. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Factors associated with placebo response rate in randomized controlled trials of antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy.局灶性癫痫抗癫痫药物随机对照试验中与安慰剂反应率相关的因素。
Epilepsia. 2025 Feb;66(2):407-416. doi: 10.1111/epi.18197. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
Quantifying and controlling the impact of regression to the mean on randomized controlled trials in epilepsy.量化和控制回归均值对癫痫随机对照试验的影响。
Epilepsia. 2023 Oct;64(10):2635-2643. doi: 10.1111/epi.17730. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
5
Flexible realistic simulation of seizure occurrence recapitulating statistical properties of seizure diaries.灵活真实地模拟发作再现发作日记统计特征的发作。
Epilepsia. 2023 Feb;64(2):396-405. doi: 10.1111/epi.17471. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
6
Development and Validation of Forecasting Next Reported Seizure Using e-Diaries.利用电子日记预测下一次癫痫发作的开发与验证。
Ann Neurol. 2020 Sep;88(3):588-595. doi: 10.1002/ana.25812. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.发作频率的自然变异性:对试验和安慰剂的影响。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 May;162:106306. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106306. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Prospective validation study of an epilepsy seizure risk system for outpatient evaluation.前瞻性验证研究:一种用于门诊评估的癫痫发作风险系统。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/epi.16397. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Characteristics of large patient-reported outcomes: Where can one million seizures get us?大型患者报告结局的特征:一百万次癫痫发作能带给我们什么?
Epilepsia Open. 2018 Jul 4;3(3):364-373. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12237. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Common data elements for epilepsy mobile health systems.癫痫移动医疗系统的通用数据元素。
Epilepsia. 2018 May;59(5):1020-1026. doi: 10.1111/epi.14066. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Nocebo effect in refractory partial epilepsy during pre-surgical monitoring: Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.术前监测期间难治性部分性癫痫中的反安慰剂效应:安慰剂对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
2
Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials--Old ideas and new insights.临床癫痫试验中对安慰剂的反应——旧观念与新见解
Epilepsy Res. 2016 May;122:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
Human focal seizures are characterized by populations of fixed duration and interval.人类局灶性癫痫发作的特征是具有固定的持续时间和间隔。
Epilepsia. 2016 Mar;57(3):359-68. doi: 10.1111/epi.13291. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Perampanel for tonic-clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy A randomized trial.吡仑帕奈用于特发性全身性癫痫强直阵挛发作的随机试验
Neurology. 2015 Sep 15;85(11):950-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001930.
5
And Pavlov still rings a bell: summarising the evidence for the use of a bell in Pavlov's iconic experiments on classical conditioning.而巴甫洛夫的铃铛仍在回响:总结在巴甫洛夫关于经典条件作用的标志性实验中使用铃铛的证据。
J Neurol. 2015 Sep;262(9):2177-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7858-5. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
Confusing placebo effect with natural history in epilepsy: A big data approach.癫痫中安慰剂效应与自然病史的混淆:一种大数据方法。
Ann Neurol. 2015 Sep;78(3):329-36. doi: 10.1002/ana.24470. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Placebo effect of medication cost in Parkinson disease: a randomized double-blind study.帕金森病中药物成本的安慰剂效应:一项随机双盲研究。
Neurology. 2015 Feb 24;84(8):794-802. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001282. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Placebo effects: from the neurobiological paradigm to translational implications.安慰剂效应:从神经生物学范式到转化意义。
Neuron. 2014 Nov 5;84(3):623-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.023.
9
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.系统综述霍桑效应:需要新的概念来研究研究参与效应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study.耐药性癫痫患者的长期植入式癫痫预警系统预测癫痫发作的可能性:首例人体研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jun;12(6):563-71. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70075-9. Epub 2013 May 2.

多数据集时间反转方法在临床试验安慰剂反应及与癫痫自然变异性的关系研究。

A multi-dataset time-reversal approach to clinical trial placebo response and the relationship to natural variability in epilepsy.

机构信息

National Institutes of Health, NINDS, United States; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Neurology, United States.

Centers for Disease Control, United States.

出版信息

Seizure. 2017 Dec;53:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.016
PMID:29102709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722663/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical epilepsy drug trials have been measuring increasingly high placebo response rates, up to 40%. This study was designed to examine the relationship between the natural variability in epilepsy, and the placebo response seen in trials. We tested the hypothesis that 'reversing' trial direction, with the baseline period as the treatment observation phase, would reveal effects of natural variability.

METHOD

Clinical trial simulations were run with time running forward and in reverse. Data sources were: SeizureTracker.com (patient reported diaries), a randomized sham-controlled TMS trial, and chronically implanted intracranial EEG electrodes. Outcomes were 50%-responder rates (RR50) and median percentage change (MPC).

RESULTS

The RR50 results showed evidence that temporal reversal does not prevent large responder rates across datasets. The MPC results negative in the TMS dataset, and positive in the other two.

CONCLUSIONS

Typical RR50s of clinical trials can be reproduced using the natural variability of epilepsy as a substrate across multiple datasets. Therefore, the placebo response in epilepsy clinical trials may be attributable almost entirely to this variability, rather than the "placebo effect".

摘要

目的

临床癫痫药物试验的安慰剂反应率不断升高,高达 40%。本研究旨在探讨癫痫的自然变异性与试验中所见安慰剂反应之间的关系。我们检验了这样一个假设,即“反转”试验方向,以基线期作为治疗观察期,将揭示自然变异性的影响。

方法

采用正向和反向时间运行进行临床试验模拟。数据来源为:SeizureTracker.com(患者报告日记)、一项随机假手术对照 TMS 试验和慢性植入颅内 EEG 电极。结果是 50%反应率(RR50)和中位数百分比变化(MPC)。

结果

RR50 结果表明,时间反转并不能阻止各数据集的高反应率。TMS 数据集的 MPC 结果为阴性,而其他两个数据集的 MPC 结果为阳性。

结论

可以使用癫痫的自然变异性作为多个数据集的基础,重现典型的临床试验 RR50。因此,癫痫临床试验中的安慰剂反应可能几乎完全归因于这种变异性,而不是“安慰剂效应”。