BIO5 Institute, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
BIO5 Institute, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018 Feb;1860(2):272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.10.026. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
AM2 and BM2 proton channels are attractive antiviral drug targets due to their essential roles during influenza virus replication. Although both AM2 and BM2 are proton-selective ion channels, they share little sequence similarity except for the HXXXW sequence, which suggests that their proton conductance properties might differ. To test this hypothesis, we applied two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiological assays to study the specific conductance, leakage current, channel activation, and inhibition of AM2 and BM2 proton channels. It was found that BM2 channel has a higher specific conductance than AM2 channel at pH5.5. Unlike AM2 channel, whose proton conductance is asymmetric (from viral exterior to interior), BM2 channel is capable of conducting proton in both directions. Moreover, BM2 requires a more acidic pH for channel activation than AM2, as revealed by its lower pK values. Finally, both AM2 and BM2 can be inhibited by Cu(II) and Cu(I). Overall, the results from this side-by-side comparison of AM2 and BM2 channels reveal the structure-function relationships of these two viroporins, and such information might be important for the designing of novel ion channels.
AM2 和 BM2 质子通道因其在流感病毒复制过程中的重要作用,成为有吸引力的抗病毒药物靶点。尽管 AM2 和 BM2 都是质子选择性离子通道,但它们除了 HXXXW 序列外,序列相似性很小,这表明它们的质子传导特性可能不同。为了验证这一假设,我们应用双电极电压钳电生理学测定法研究了 AM2 和 BM2 质子通道的特定电导、漏电流、通道激活和抑制。结果发现,在 pH5.5 时,BM2 通道的比电导高于 AM2 通道。与 AM2 通道的质子传导呈不对称性(从病毒外到内)不同,BM2 通道能够双向传导质子。此外,BM2 通道的激活需要比 AM2 通道更酸性的 pH 值,这反映在其较低的 pK 值上。最后,AM2 和 BM2 都可以被 Cu(II)和 Cu(I)抑制。总的来说,对 AM2 和 BM2 通道的并排比较的结果揭示了这两种 viroporins 的结构-功能关系,这些信息对于新型离子通道的设计可能很重要。