Suppr超能文献

射频消融联合胆道支架置入与单纯支架置入治疗恶性胆道狭窄的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement versus stent placement alone for malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Arizona Center for Digestive Health, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health System, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr;87(4):944-951.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Unresectable malignant biliary strictures are generally managed by palliative stent placement for drainage of biliary tree. Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to improve the patency of biliary stents in these patients. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of biliary stent placement with RFA on stent patency and patient survival with variable results. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary stent placement with RFA compared with stent placement alone in patients with malignant biliary strictures.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases for all studies comparing RFA with biliary stent placement versus stent placement only. Measured outcomes included patient survival, stent patency, and procedure-related adverse events. An inverse variance method was used to pool data on stent patency into a random-effects model. Cox-regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratio for survival analysis. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to interpret our findings.

RESULTS

Nine studies (including 2 abstracts) with a total of 505 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled weighted mean difference in stent patency was 50.6 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.83-68.48), favoring patients receiving RFA. Pooled survival analysis of the reconstructed Kaplan-Meier data showed improved survival in patients treated with RFA (hazard ratio, 1.395; 95% CI, 1.145-1.7; P < .001). However, RFA was associated with a higher risk of postprocedural abdominal pain (31% vs 20%, P = .003). Our analysis did not show significant difference between the RFA and stent placement-only groups with regard to the risk of cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and hemobilia.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of this limited data based on observational studies, RFA was found to be safe and was associated with improved stent patency in patients with malignant biliary strictures. In addition, RFA may be associated with improved survival in these patients.

摘要

背景和目的

不可切除的恶性胆道狭窄通常通过姑息性支架置入术来引流胆道。最近,射频消融(RFA)已被用于改善这些患者的胆道支架通畅性。几项研究评估了 RFA 联合胆道支架置入术与单纯支架置入术对支架通畅性和患者生存的影响,结果各不相同。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估 RFA 联合胆道支架置入术与单纯支架置入术治疗恶性胆道狭窄患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们全面检索了电子数据库,以查找比较 RFA 联合胆道支架置入术与单纯支架置入术的所有研究。测量结果包括患者生存、支架通畅性和与操作相关的不良事件。我们采用逆方差法将支架通畅性数据汇总到随机效应模型中。采用 Cox 回归分析计算生存分析的风险比。我们使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)框架来解释我们的发现。

结果

共有 9 项研究(包括 2 项摘要)纳入了 505 例患者。荟萃分析中,RFA 组与单纯支架组的支架通畅率加权平均差异为 50.6 天(95%置信区间[CI],32.83-68.48),RFA 组更优。对重建的 Kaplan-Meier 数据进行的汇总生存分析显示,RFA 治疗组患者的生存率提高(风险比,1.395;95%CI,1.145-1.7;P<.001)。然而,RFA 与术后腹痛的风险增加相关(31%比 20%,P=0.003)。我们的分析并未显示 RFA 组与单纯支架组在胆管炎、急性胆囊炎、胰腺炎和胆道出血的风险方面存在显著差异。

结论

基于观察性研究的有限数据,RFA 是安全的,并且与恶性胆道狭窄患者的支架通畅性改善相关。此外,RFA 可能与这些患者的生存改善相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验