University of Waterloo, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
University of Waterloo, Department of System Design Engineering, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Nov;22(11):1-4. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.11.110501.
The variability in the spatial orientation of retinal blood vessels near the optic nerve head (ONH) results in imprecision of the measured Doppler angle and therefore the pulsatile blood flow (BF), when those parameters are evaluated using Doppler OCT imaging protocols based on dual-concentric circular scans. Here, we utilized a dense concentric circle scanning protocol and evaluated its precision for measuring pulsatile retinal BF in rats for different numbers of the circular scans. An spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) system operating in the 1060-nm spectral range with image acquisition rate of 47,000 A-scans/s was used to acquire concentric circular scans centered at the rat's ONH, with diameters ranging from 0.8 to 1.0 mm. A custom, automatic blood vessel segmentation algorithm was used to track the spatial orientation of the retinal blood vessels in three dimensions, evaluate the spatially dependent Doppler angle and calculate more accurately the axial BF for each major retinal blood vessel. Metrics such as retinal BF, pulsatility index, and resistance index were evaluated for each and all of the major retinal blood vessels. The performance of the proposed dense concentric circle scanning protocols was compared with that of the dual-circle scanning protocol. Results showed a 3.8±2.2 deg difference in the Doppler angle calculation between the two approaches, which resulted in ∼7% difference in the calculated retinal BF.
视神经头(ONH)附近视网膜血管的空间方位变化导致使用基于双同心圆形扫描的多普勒 OCT 成像协议评估时,所测量的多普勒角度和因此产生的脉动血流(BF)存在不精确。在这里,我们利用密集同心圆形扫描协议,并评估了其在不同数量的圆形扫描下测量大鼠脉动视网膜 BF 的精度。一个工作在 1060nm 光谱范围内、图像采集速度为 47000A-scans/s 的光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)系统用于获取以大鼠 ONH 为中心、直径从 0.8 到 1.0mm 的同心圆形扫描。一个定制的、自动的血管分割算法用于在三维空间中跟踪视网膜血管的空间方位,评估空间相关的多普勒角度,并更准确地计算每个主要视网膜血管的轴向 BF。评估了每个和所有主要视网膜血管的 BF、搏动指数和阻力指数等指标。还比较了所提出的密集同心圆形扫描协议与双圆形扫描协议的性能。结果表明,两种方法的多普勒角度计算存在 3.8±2.2°的差异,这导致计算出的视网膜 BF 存在约 7%的差异。