Bilge Sedat, Aydın Attila, Bilge Meltem, Aydın Cemile, Çevik Erdem, Eryılmaz Mehmet
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sultan Abdülhamit Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Nov;23(6):459-465. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.71670.
In the patients with multiple and serious trauma, early applications of life-saving procedures are related to improved survival. We tried to experimentally determine the feasibility of life-saving interventions that are performed with the aid of night vision goggles (NVG) in nighttime combat scenario.
Chest tube thoracostomy (CTT), emergency cricothyroidotomy (EC), and needle thoracostomy (NT) interventions were performed by 10 combatant medical staff. The success and duration of interventions were explored in the study. Procedures were performed on the formerly prepared manikins/models in a bright room and in a dark room with the aid of NVG. Operators graded the ease of interventions.
All interventions were found successful. Operators stated that both CTT and EC interventions were more difficult in dark than in daytime (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the difficulty in the NT interventions. No significant difference was observed in terms of completion times of interventions between in daytime and in dark scenario.
The operators who use NVGs have to be aware of that they can perform their tactic and medical activities without taking off the NVGs and without the requirement of an extra light source.
在多发严重创伤患者中,早期实施挽救生命的操作与提高生存率相关。我们试图通过实验确定在夜间战斗场景中借助夜视镜(NVG)进行挽救生命干预措施的可行性。
10名战斗医务人员进行了胸腔闭式引流术(CTT)、紧急环甲膜切开术(EC)和胸腔穿刺术(NT)干预操作。研究中探讨了干预操作的成功率和持续时间。操作在先前准备好的人体模型上进行,分别在明亮房间以及借助夜视镜在黑暗房间中进行。操作人员对干预操作的难易程度进行评分。
所有干预操作均成功。操作人员表示,CTT和EC干预操作在黑暗中比在白天更困难(p<0.05)。NT干预操作的难度未观察到显著差异。白天和黑暗场景下干预操作的完成时间方面未观察到显著差异。
使用夜视镜的操作人员必须意识到,他们无需摘下夜视镜且无需额外光源就能进行战术和医疗活动。