• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家免疫规划信息系统评估——肯尼亚,2015年;加纳,2016年。

Country Immunization Information System Assessments - Kenya, 2015 and Ghana, 2016.

作者信息

Scott Colleen, Clarke Kristie E N, Grevendonk Jan, Dolan Samantha B, Ahmed Hussein Osman, Kamau Peter, Ademba Peter Aswani, Osadebe Lynda, Bonsu George, Opare Joseph, Diamenu Stanley, Amenuvegbe Gregory, Quaye Pamela, Osei-Sarpong Fred, Abotsi Francis, Ankrah Joseph Dwomor, MacNeil Adam

出版信息

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 10;66(44):1226-1229. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6644a5.

DOI:10.15585/mmwr.mm6644a5
PMID:29121004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5679588/
Abstract

The collection, analysis, and use of data to measure and improve immunization program performance are priorities for the World Health Organization (WHO), global partners, and national immunization programs (NIPs). High quality data are essential for evidence-based decision-making to support successful NIPs. Consistent recording and reporting practices, optimal access to and use of health information systems, and rigorous interpretation and use of data for decision-making are characteristics of high-quality immunization information systems. In 2015 and 2016, immunization information system assessments (IISAs) were conducted in Kenya and Ghana using a new WHO and CDC assessment methodology designed to identify root causes of immunization data quality problems and facilitate development of plans for improvement. Data quality challenges common to both countries included low confidence in facility-level target population data (Kenya = 50%, Ghana = 53%) and poor data concordance between child registers and facility tally sheets (Kenya = 0%, Ghana = 3%). In Kenya, systemic challenges included limited supportive supervision and lack of resources to access electronic reporting systems; in Ghana, challenges included a poorly defined subdistrict administrative level. Data quality improvement plans (DQIPs) based on assessment findings are being implemented in both countries. IISAs can help countries identify and address root causes of poor immunization data to provide a stronger evidence base for future investments in immunization programs.

摘要

收集、分析和使用数据以衡量和改进免疫规划绩效,是世界卫生组织(WHO)、全球合作伙伴以及国家免疫规划(NIPs)的工作重点。高质量数据对于基于证据的决策至关重要,有助于支持国家免疫规划取得成功。一致的记录和报告做法、优化获取和使用卫生信息系统,以及严谨解读和运用数据进行决策,都是高质量免疫信息系统的特征。2015年和2016年,肯尼亚和加纳采用了世界卫生组织和美国疾病控制与预防中心设计的新评估方法开展免疫信息系统评估(IISAs),旨在找出免疫数据质量问题的根本原因,并推动制定改进计划。两国共有的数据质量挑战包括对机构层面目标人群数据的信心不足(肯尼亚为50%,加纳为53%),以及儿童登记册与机构计数表之间的数据一致性较差(肯尼亚为0%,加纳为3%)。在肯尼亚,系统性挑战包括支持性监督有限以及缺乏使用电子报告系统的资源;在加纳,挑战包括对分区行政级别定义不清。两国都在根据评估结果实施数据质量改进计划(DQIPs)。免疫信息系统评估有助于各国找出并解决免疫数据质量差的根本原因,为未来免疫规划投资提供更有力的证据基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adce/5679588/952e0455a253/mm6644a5-F.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adce/5679588/952e0455a253/mm6644a5-F.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adce/5679588/952e0455a253/mm6644a5-F.jpg

相似文献

1
Country Immunization Information System Assessments - Kenya, 2015 and Ghana, 2016.国家免疫规划信息系统评估——肯尼亚,2015年;加纳,2016年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 10;66(44):1226-1229. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6644a5.
2
Country Immunization Information System Assessments (IISAs), in Kenya (2015) and Ghana (2016).肯尼亚(2015年)和加纳(2016年)的国家免疫信息系统评估(IISAs)。
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017 Nov 10;92(45):694-700.
3
Surveillance for the Expanded Programme on Immunization.扩大免疫规划监测
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):633-9.
4
Assessing immunization data quality from routine reports in Mozambique.评估莫桑比克常规报告中的免疫数据质量。
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 11;5:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-108.
5
Strengthening Care Delivery in Primary Care Facilities: Perspectives of Facility Managers on the Immunization Program in Kenya.加强基层医疗设施的护理服务提供:肯尼亚基层医疗设施管理者对免疫规划项目的看法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):1130-1137. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.83.
6
Assessment of select electronic health information systems that support immunization data capture - Kenya, 2017.评估支持免疫数据采集的特定电子健康信息系统 - 肯尼亚,2017 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3435-9.
7
Understanding the policy environment for immunization supply chains: Lessons learned from landscape analyses in Uganda and Senegal.了解免疫供应链的政策环境:乌干达和塞内加尔情况分析的经验教训。
Vaccine. 2017 Apr 19;35(17):2141-2147. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.089.
8
Determinants of routine immunization costing in Benin and Ghana in 2011.2011年贝宁和加纳常规免疫接种成本的决定因素。
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.069.
9
The imperative for stronger vaccine supply and logistics systems.加强疫苗供应和物流系统的必要性。
Vaccine. 2013 Apr 18;31 Suppl 2:B73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.036.
10
Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana.提高健康信息质量:博茨瓦纳数据管理和报告系统的定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jan 30;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Child immunization data quality in Rwanda: an assessment of routine health information system data.卢旺达儿童免疫接种数据质量:常规卫生信息系统数据评估
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;83(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01583-7.
2
Situational analysis of the quality of maternal, child, and adolescent health data in the health districts of Thiès, Mbour, Kédougou, and Saraya in Senegal.塞内加尔捷斯、姆布尔、凯杜古和萨拉亚等卫生区孕产妇、儿童和青少年健康数据质量的情况分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21241-x.
3
Immunization data quality and decision making in pertussis outbreak management in southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracking progress towards universal childhood immunisation and the impact of global initiatives: a systematic analysis of three-dose diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis immunisation coverage.追踪全球儿童免疫规划的进展及全球倡议的影响:对白喉、破伤风和百日咳三联疫苗免疫覆盖率的系统分析
Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2031-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61869-3.
2
Design and simulation study of the immunization Data Quality Audit (DQA).免疫接种数据质量审计(DQA)的设计与模拟研究
Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.038. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
3
The immunization data quality audit: verifying the quality and consistency of immunization monitoring systems.
埃塞俄比亚南部百日咳疫情管理中的免疫数据质量与决策:一项横断面研究
Arch Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;80(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00805-6.
4
A realist systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries of interventions to improve immunization data use.低、中收入国家改善免疫数据使用干预措施的证据的现实主义系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 8;21(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06633-8.
5
Assessment of immunization data quality of routine reports in Ho municipality of Volta region, Ghana.加纳沃尔特地区霍市常规报告免疫接种数据质量评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05865-4.
6
Electronic immunization information systems: a case report of lessons learned from implementation in Pakistan.电子免疫信息系统:巴基斯坦实施经验教训的案例报告
Mhealth. 2020 Jul 5;6:31. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2020.01.07. eCollection 2020.
7
Assessing electronic immunization registries: the Pan American Health Organization experience.评估电子免疫登记系统:泛美卫生组织的经验。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Mar 15;43:e28. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2019.28. eCollection 2019.
8
Defining & assessing the quality, usability, and utilization of immunization data.定义和评估免疫数据的质量、可用性和利用情况。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6709-1.
9
Redefining vaccination coverage and timeliness measures using electronic immunization registry data in low- and middle-income countries.利用电子免疫登记数据重新定义低收入和中等收入国家的疫苗接种覆盖率和及时性衡量标准。
Vaccine. 2019 Mar 22;37(13):1859-1867. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
免疫接种数据质量审计:核实免疫接种监测系统的质量与一致性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jul;83(7):503-10.
4
Validity of reported vaccination coverage in 45 countries.45个国家报告的疫苗接种覆盖率的有效性。
Lancet. 2003 Sep 27;362(9389):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14411-X.