Mavimbe João C, Braa Jørn, Bjune Gunnar
Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 11;5:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-108.
Worldwide immunization coverage shows an increase in the past years but the validity of the official reports for measuring change over time has been questioned. Facing this problem, donor supported initiatives like the Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunizations, have been putting a lot of effort into assessing the quality of data used, since accurate immunization information is essential for the Expanded Program on Immunization managers to track and improve program performance. The present article, discusses the practices on record keeping, reporting and the support mechanism to ensure data quality in Mozambique.
A process evaluation study was carried out in Mozambique in one district (Cuamba) in Niassa Province, between January and March 2003. The study was based on semi-structured interviews, participant observation and review of the data collection materials.
Differences were found for all vaccine types when comparing facility reports with the tally sheets. The same applies when comparing facility reports with district reports. The study also showed that a routine practice during supervision visits was data quality assessment for the outpatient services but none related to data consistency between the tally sheets and the facility report. For the Expanded Program on Immunization, supervisors concentrated more on the consistency checks between data in the facility reports and the number of vaccines received during the same period. Meetings were based on criticism, for example, why health workers did not reach the target. Nothing in terms of data quality was addressed nor validation rules.
In this paper we have argued that the quality of data, and consequently of the information system, must be seen in a broader perspective not focusing only on technicalities (data collection tools and the reporting system) but also on support mechanisms. Implications of a poor data quality system will be reflected in the efficiency of health services facing increased demands, with stagnant or decreasing resources.
全球免疫接种覆盖率在过去几年有所上升,但官方报告用于衡量随时间变化的有效性受到质疑。面对这一问题,诸如全球疫苗免疫联盟等受捐助方支持的倡议一直在大力评估所使用数据的质量,因为准确的免疫接种信息对于扩大免疫规划管理人员跟踪和改善项目绩效至关重要。本文讨论了莫桑比克在记录保存、报告以及确保数据质量的支持机制方面的做法。
2003年1月至3月期间,在尼亚萨省的一个区(夸姆巴)开展了一项过程评估研究。该研究基于半结构化访谈、参与观察以及对数据收集材料的审查。
将机构报告与计数表进行比较时,发现所有疫苗类型均存在差异。将机构报告与地区报告进行比较时也是如此。该研究还表明,监督访问期间的常规做法是对门诊服务进行数据质量评估,但没有涉及计数表与机构报告之间的数据一致性。对于扩大免疫规划,监督员更关注机构报告中的数据与同期收到的疫苗数量之间的一致性检查。会议主要是批评性的,例如,卫生工作者为何未达到目标。没有讨论数据质量方面的任何问题,也没有提及验证规则。
在本文中,我们认为必须从更广泛的角度看待数据质量以及信息系统,不仅要关注技术层面(数据收集工具和报告系统),还要关注支持机制。数据质量差的系统所产生的影响将反映在面对资源停滞或减少但需求增加的卫生服务效率上。