Makrani Atekeh Hadinezhad, Afshari Mahdi, Ghajar Marayam, Forooghi Zahra, Moosazadeh Mahmood
Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Department of Community Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Korean J Pain. 2017 Oct;30(4):250-257. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.4.250. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Vitamin D is a cofactor responsible for autoimmune disorders. There is no agreement in the studies investigating the association between vitamin D and fibromyalgia. This study aims to combine the conflicting results of the primary studies which compared these patients with control groups regarding the serum concentration of vitamin D. This meta-analysis has been designed based on PRISMA guidelines. Relevant keywords were searched in PubMed, Science direct, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google scholar and primary studies were selected. After screening the eligible studies according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, we investigated the risk of bias in the selected studies and also the heterogeneity between the primary results using Cochrane (Q) and I-squared (I) indices. The primary results were combined using inverse variance method and Cohen statistics as well as a random effects model. Publication bias was assessed using Egger test. Sensitivity analysis was applied to investigate the influence of each primary study on the final result of the meta-analysis. Suspected factors in the heterogeneity were assessed using meta-regression models. We entered 12 eligible studies in the meta-analysis including 851 cases compared with 862 controls. The standardized mean difference of Vitamin D between the two groups was -0.56 (95% confidence interval: -1.05, -0.08). Our meta-analysis showed that vitamin D serum levels of patients with fibromyalgia was significantly lower than that of control group.
维生素D是一种与自身免疫性疾病相关的辅助因子。在研究维生素D与纤维肌痛之间关联的研究中,尚未达成共识。本研究旨在综合那些将这些患者与对照组在维生素D血清浓度方面进行比较的初步研究的相互矛盾的结果。本荟萃分析是根据PRISMA指南设计的。在PubMed、Science direct、Scopus、Cochrane和谷歌学术中搜索了相关关键词,并选择了初步研究。根据纳入/排除标准筛选符合条件的研究后,我们调查了所选研究中的偏倚风险以及使用Cochrane(Q)和I平方(I)指数评估初步结果之间的异质性。使用逆方差法、Cohen统计以及随机效应模型对初步结果进行合并。使用Egger检验评估发表偏倚。应用敏感性分析来研究每项初步研究对荟萃分析最终结果的影响。使用元回归模型评估异质性中的可疑因素。我们将12项符合条件的研究纳入荟萃分析,其中包括851例病例与862例对照。两组之间维生素D的标准化平均差异为-0.56(95%置信区间:-1.05,-0.08)。我们的荟萃分析表明,纤维肌痛患者的维生素D血清水平显著低于对照组。