Center for Sustainable Mobility, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
Center for Sustainable Mobility, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 4, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:774-784. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.248. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
Exhaust emissions of eight Euro 6 light duty vehicles - two station wagons and six vans - half powered by diesel fuel and half by compressed natural gas (CNG) were examined using both chassis dynamometer and on-road testing. A portable on-board FTIR analyzer was used to measure concentrations of reactive nitrogen compounds - NO, NO and ammonia, of CO, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and greenhouse gases CO, methane and NO. Exhaust flow was inferred from engine control unit data. Total emissions per cycle were compared and found to be in good agreement with laboratory measurements of NO, CO and CO during dynamometer tests. On diesel engines, mean NO emissions were 136-1070mg/km in the laboratory and 537-615mg/km on the road, in many cases nearly an order of magnitude higher compared to the numerical value of the Euro 6 limit. Mean NO emissions were 3-19mg/km and were equivalent to several g/km CO. The measurements suggest that NO and NO emissions from late-model European light utility vehicles with diesel engines are non-negligible and should be continuously assessed and scrutinized. High variances in NO emissions among the tested diesel vehicles suggest that large number of vehicles should be tested to offer at least some insights about distribution of fleet emissions among vehicles. CNG engines exhibited relatively low emissions of NO (12-186mg/km) and NH (10-24mg/km), while mean emissions of methane were 18-45mg/km, under 1g/km CO equivalent, and NO, CO, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were negligible. The combination of a relatively clean-burning fuel, modern engine technology and a three-way catalyst has resulted in relatively low emissions under the wide variety of operating conditions encountered during the tests. The on-board FTIR has proven to be a useful instrument capable of covering, with the exception of total hydrocarbons, essentially all gaseous pollutants of interest.
对 8 辆 Euro 6 轻型车辆(2 辆旅行车和 6 辆货车)的废气排放进行了检查,这些车辆一半使用柴油燃料,一半使用压缩天然气(CNG)。使用底盘测功机和道路测试进行了检查。使用便携式车载 FTIR 分析仪测量了活性氮化合物(NO、NO 和氨)、CO、甲醛、乙醛和温室气体 CO、甲烷和 NO 的浓度。通过发动机控制单元数据推断了废气流量。对每个循环的总排放量进行了比较,发现与底盘测功机测试中实验室测量的 NO、CO 和 CO 非常吻合。在柴油发动机上,实验室中平均 NO 排放量为 136-1070mg/km,道路上为 537-615mg/km,在许多情况下,比 Euro 6 限值的数值高出近一个数量级。平均 NO 排放量为 3-19mg/km,相当于 CO 的几个克/公里。这些测量结果表明,具有柴油发动机的新型欧洲轻型商用车的 NO 和 NO 排放不容忽视,应持续进行评估和审查。测试的柴油车辆中 NO 排放的高方差表明,应测试大量车辆,以便至少对车辆在车队排放中的分布有一些了解。CNG 发动机的 NO(12-186mg/km)和 NH(10-24mg/km)排放量相对较低,而甲烷的平均排放量为 18-45mg/km,低于 1g/km CO 当量,NO、CO、甲醛和乙醛可以忽略不计。相对清洁的燃料、现代发动机技术和三元催化剂的结合,使得在测试中遇到的各种运行条件下,排放相对较低。车载 FTIR 已被证明是一种有用的仪器,能够覆盖除总碳氢化合物外的所有基本气态污染物。