• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量癫痫患者及其护理人员所关心的事情是否值得或可行?

Is it worth it, or possible, to measure what matters to patients with epilepsy and their caregivers?

作者信息

Celani Maria Grazia, Cantisani Teresa Anna, Bignamini Angelo, Macone Sara, Papetti Rossella, Baiocco Luisa

机构信息

Department of Neurophysiopathology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy; Cochrane Neurosciences Field, Direzione Salute Welfare, Region of Umbria, Perugia, Italy.

Cochrane Neurosciences Field, Direzione Salute Welfare, Region of Umbria, Perugia, Italy; Perugia Hospital, Neurophysiopathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jan;78:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.028
PMID:29128470
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to collect perspectives, ideas, and values of people affected by epilepsy and their carer to include them in new research in this area.

DESIGN

This is a semiquantitative study analyzing needs, emotions, and medical issues emerging from focus groups with patients and carers divided in three severity levels of disease.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants were 25 patients and 36 carers attending outpatients' service of tertiary epilepsy center in Umbria, Italy.

RESULTS

Assistance was the need expressed by more than 40% of the participants followed by experience-sharing, knowledge, control, clarity, and security. The only significant effect in logistic regression analysis after adjusting for severity was the patients' expressed need for "experience-sharing" more than their carers (OR 7.29, 95%CI: 1.76-30.18). Hope was the emotion expressed by more than 50% of the participants, followed by anger, fear, and resignation. After adjusting for severity, carers were more likely to express anger, in comparison with patients (OR 17.23, 95%CI: 3.55-83.74; P<0.001). The patients were 6.88 times more likely (95%CI 1.84-25.75; P=0.004) to express "resignation" than their carers. The most frequent medical issues were related to: "medications", "frequency of crises", "work impact", "quality of life", "psychomedical integration of care", and "development of new drugs". After adjusting for severity in a logistic regression analysis, patients were more likely to express concerns for the frequency of crises than carers (OR 3.57, 95%CI: 1.16-11.04; P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' and carers' priorities, based on intense personal insight, represent a starting point to work for shared outcome measures in clinical trials and shared agenda in research, including research of strong evidence in complex intervention as service models for people with epilepsy.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是收集癫痫患者及其照料者的观点、想法和价值观,以便将其纳入该领域的新研究中。

设计

这是一项半定量研究,分析了来自按疾病严重程度分为三个级别的患者和照料者焦点小组中出现的需求、情绪和医疗问题。

参与者

参与者为25名患者和36名照料者,他们在意大利翁布里亚的三级癫痫中心门诊就诊。

结果

超过40%的参与者表示需要援助,其次是经验分享、知识、控制、清晰度和安全感。在对严重程度进行调整后的逻辑回归分析中,唯一显著的影响是患者比其照料者更倾向于表达“经验分享”的需求(比值比7.29,95%置信区间:1.76 - 30.18)。超过50%的参与者表达的情绪是希望,其次是愤怒、恐惧和顺从。在对严重程度进行调整后,与患者相比,照料者更有可能表达愤怒(比值比17.23,95%置信区间:3.55 - 83.74;P<0.001)。患者表达“顺从”的可能性是其照料者的6.88倍(95%置信区间1.84 - 25.75;P = 0.004)。最常见的医疗问题与“药物治疗”、“发作频率”、“工作影响”、“生活质量”、“精神医学护理整合”以及“新药研发”有关。在逻辑回归分析中对严重程度进行调整后,患者比照料者更有可能表达对发作频率的担忧(比值比3.57,95%置信区间:1.16 - 11.04;P = 0.027)。

结论

基于深刻个人见解的患者和照料者的优先事项,是开展临床试验中共享结果测量以及研究中共享议程(包括作为癫痫患者服务模式的复杂干预中有力证据的研究)工作的起点。

相似文献

1
Is it worth it, or possible, to measure what matters to patients with epilepsy and their caregivers?衡量癫痫患者及其护理人员所关心的事情是否值得或可行?
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jan;78:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
2
The role of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool in palliative home care: A qualitative study of practitioners' perspectives of its impact and mechanisms of action.护理者支持需求评估工具在姑息家庭护理中的作用:一项关于从业者对其影响和作用机制看法的定性研究
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):392-400. doi: 10.1177/0269216315596662. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
Which outcomes should we measure in adult epilepsy trials? The views of people with epilepsy and informal carers.在成人癫痫试验中我们应该衡量哪些结果?癫痫患者和非正式照料者的观点。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Jun;59:105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.01.036. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
4
People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their caregivers: what matters most?肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者及其照料者:最重要的是什么?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002741.
5
Development of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: a qualitative study.开发一种用于家庭临终关怀实践的照顾者支持需求评估工具(CSNAT):一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216312440607. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
6
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
7
Information-sharing with respite care services for older adults: a qualitative exploration of carers' experiences.与老年人临时护理服务的信息共享:对护理人员经历的质性探索。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jul;25(4):1404-1415. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12440. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Tools to measure quality of life and carer burden in informal carers of heart failure patients: a narrative review.用于测量心力衰竭患者非专业照护者生活质量和照护者负担的工具:叙述性综述。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):596-607. doi: 10.1177/0269216313477179. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
The information needs of carers of adults diagnosed with epilepsy.成年癫痫患者照料者的信息需求。
Seizure. 2004 Oct;13(7):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2003.12.003.
10
Developing the knowledge base about carers and personalisation: contributions made by an exploration of carers' perspectives on personal budgets and the carer-service user relationship.构建关于照料者及个性化的知识库:通过探究照料者对个人预算及照料者与服务使用者关系的看法所做出的贡献。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12131. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Health priorities and treatment preferences of adults with epilepsy: A narrative literature review with a systematic search.癫痫成人患者的健康优先事项和治疗偏好:一项系统检索的叙述性文献综述
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110359. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110359. Epub 2025 Mar 4.