Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
MUTANT Agency for Diversity and Change, The Hague, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337.
To explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.
A qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured interviews, conducted during three interview rounds over the course of a year. Analysis was by means of content analysis and typology construction.
Community settings and nursing homes in the Netherlands.
19 people with dementia, 36 of their informal caregivers and 38 of their professionals (including nurses, daycare employees and case managers).
The participants' responses related to three critical points in the decision-making trajectory about daycare: (1) the initial positive or negative expectations of daycare; (2) negotiation about trying out daycare by promoting, resisting or attuning to others; and (3) trying daycare, which resulted in positive or negative reactions from people with dementia and led to a decision. The ways in which care networks proceeded through these three critical points resulted in a typology of participation trajectories, including (1) working together positively toward daycare, (2) bringing conflicting perspectives together toward trying daycare and (3) not reaching commitment to try daycare.
Shared decision making with people with dementia is possible and requires and adapted process of decision making. Our results show that initial preferences based on information alone may change when people with dementia experience daycare. It is important to have a try-out period so that people with dementia can experience daycare without having to decide whether to continue it. Whereas shared decision making in general aims at moving from initial preferences to informed preferences, professionals should focus more on moving from initial preferences to experienced preferences for people with dementia. Professionals can play a crucial role in facilitating the possibilities for a try-out period.
探讨痴呆症患者、他们的非正式照顾者及其专业人员如何参与日托决策,并制定参与轨迹的分类法。
一项定性研究,采用前瞻性、多视角设计,基于 244 次半结构化访谈,在一年中的三个访谈轮次中进行。分析采用内容分析和类型学构建。
荷兰的社区环境和养老院。
19 名痴呆症患者、36 名非正式照顾者和 38 名专业人员(包括护士、日托员工和个案经理)。
参与者的回答涉及日托决策轨迹的三个关键点:(1)对日托的最初积极或消极期望;(2)通过促进、抵制或顺应他人来协商尝试日托;(3)尝试日托,这导致痴呆症患者产生积极或消极的反应,并做出决定。护理网络在这三个关键点上的进展方式导致了参与轨迹的分类法,包括(1)积极地共同走向日托,(2)将冲突的观点整合在一起以尝试日托,以及(3)无法承诺尝试日托。
与痴呆症患者共同做出决策是可能的,并且需要一个适应的决策过程。我们的研究结果表明,当痴呆症患者体验日托时,基于信息的最初偏好可能会发生变化。重要的是要有一个试用阶段,以便痴呆症患者可以体验日托,而不必决定是否继续。虽然一般的共同决策旨在从最初的偏好转变为知情的偏好,但专业人员应更专注于将最初的偏好转变为痴呆症患者的体验偏好。专业人员可以在促进试用阶段的可能性方面发挥关键作用。