Srikuea Ratchakrit, Suhatcho Kanokwan
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
J Physiol Sci. 2018 Sep;68(5):647-661. doi: 10.1007/s12576-017-0576-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Interpretation on the effectiveness of potential substances to enhance skeletal muscle regeneration is difficult if an inappropriate vehicle is administered, since vehicle administration can directly enhance or suppress regenerative capacity. In the current study, intramuscular administration of lipid-soluble and water-soluble vehicles into regenerating muscle at the distinct phases of skeletal muscle regeneration (regenerative vs. remodeling) were investigated. Tested vehicles included lipid-soluble [olive oil, (0.1, 1, 5, and 40%) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 40% propylene glycol (PG)] and water-soluble [0.9% NaCl, PBS, 0.1% ethanol, and distilled water]. Skeletal muscle regeneration was induced by 1.2% BaCl injection to the tibialis anterior muscle of 10-week-old C57BL/6 male mice. Histological features, skeletal muscle stem cell activity, regenerating muscle fiber formation, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and macrophage infiltration were examined. The results revealed repeated administration of 40% DMSO and 40% PG causes significant recurrent muscle injury, which is pronounced during the remodeling phase compared to the regenerative phase. These findings were supported by (1) massive infiltration of F4/80 macrophages; (2) significant increase of skeletal muscle stem cell re-activation and nascent regenerating muscle fiber formation; (3) excess fibrous formation; and (4) decreased regenerating muscle fiber cross-sectional area. These deleterious effects were comparable to 2% trypsin (degenerative substance) administration and less pronounced with a single administration. Nevertheless, recurrent muscle injury was still presented with 5% DMSO administration but it can be alleviated when 0.1% DMSO was administered during the remodeling phase. In contrast, none of the tested vehicles enhanced regenerative capacity compared with IGF-1 administration. Altogether, intramuscular administration of vehicle containing high concentration of DMSO or PG could impair skeletal muscle regenerative capacity and potentially affect validation of the investigational substance.
如果使用了不恰当的赋形剂,就很难解读潜在物质对增强骨骼肌再生的有效性,因为赋形剂的使用本身就可能直接增强或抑制再生能力。在本研究中,我们调查了在骨骼肌再生的不同阶段(再生期与重塑期)向再生肌肉内注射脂溶性和水溶性赋形剂的情况。所测试的赋形剂包括脂溶性的[橄榄油、(0.1%、1%、5%和40%)二甲基亚砜(DMSO)以及40%丙二醇(PG)]和水溶性的[0.9%氯化钠、磷酸盐缓冲液(PBS)、0.1%乙醇和蒸馏水]。通过向10周龄C57BL/6雄性小鼠的胫前肌注射1.2%氯化钡来诱导骨骼肌再生。我们检查了组织学特征、骨骼肌干细胞活性、再生肌纤维形成、血管生成、细胞外基质重塑以及巨噬细胞浸润情况。结果显示,重复注射40%DMSO和40%PG会导致明显的反复性肌肉损伤,与再生期相比,在重塑期这种损伤更为明显。这些发现得到了以下几点的支持:(1)F4/80巨噬细胞大量浸润;(2)骨骼肌干细胞重新激活以及新生再生肌纤维形成显著增加;(3)纤维形成过多;(4)再生肌纤维横截面积减小。这些有害影响与注射2%胰蛋白酶(变性物质)相当,单次注射时影响较小。然而,注射5%DMSO仍会出现反复性肌肉损伤,但在重塑期注射0.1%DMSO时这种损伤可以得到缓解。相比之下,与注射胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)相比,所测试的赋形剂均未增强再生能力。总之,肌肉内注射含有高浓度DMSO或PG的赋形剂会损害骨骼肌再生能力,并可能影响受试物质的验证。