Challis B H, Chiu C Y, Kerr S A, Law J, Schneider L, Yonelinas A, Tulving E
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Memory. 1993 Jun;1(2):127-51. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258228.
Subjects saw or heard words in a list (e.g. limerick) and then took two successive tests. The first was a yes/no recognition test in which auditory/visual modality of test words was manipulated orthogonally to the study modality. The second test varied with experimental conditions: subjects produced words to either perceptual (fragment) cues (l- -e-ick) or conceptual cues (What name is given to a lighthearted five-line poem?), under either explicit or implicit retrieval instructions. The major findings were: (a) that regardless of the type of retrieval cue (perceptual or conceptual) the degree of dependency between recognition and cued recall was greater than that between recognition and implicit retrieval; and (b) that modality shifts adversely affected perceptually cued explicit and implicit retrieval, whereas they had no effect either on conceptually cued retrieval or on recognition. These results suggest that the memory system subserving, and the processes involved in, conceptual priming differ from those underlying recognition and perceptual priming.
受试者观看或聆听列表中的单词(如打油诗),然后进行两项连续测试。第一项是是/否识别测试,其中测试单词的听觉/视觉模态与学习模态进行正交操纵。第二项测试根据实验条件而有所不同:在明确或隐含的检索指令下,受试者根据感知(片段)线索(l- -e-ick)或概念线索(给一种轻松的五行诗起的什么名字?)生成单词。主要发现如下:(a)无论检索线索的类型(感知或概念)如何,识别与线索回忆之间的依赖程度都大于识别与隐含检索之间的依赖程度;(b)模态转换对感知线索的明确和隐含检索有不利影响,而对概念线索检索或识别没有影响。这些结果表明,支持概念启动的记忆系统以及其中涉及的过程与识别和感知启动所基于的系统不同。