• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Families and the Juvenile Justice System: Considerations for Family-Based Interventions.家庭与少年司法系统:基于家庭的干预措施考量
Fam Community Health. 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):55-63. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000172.
2
Juvenile justice mental health services.青少年司法心理健康服务。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Oct;11(4):731-48. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00024-x.
3
An independent effectiveness trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile justice youth.一项针对青少年司法系统青少年的多系统治疗独立疗效试验。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Jun;35(2):227-36. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_6.
4
Family and parenting interventions in children and adolescents with conduct disorder and delinquency aged 10-17.针对10至17岁品行障碍和犯罪青少年的家庭及养育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD003015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003015.
5
Lessons Learned: Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Family-Based Intervention Research in Juvenile Justice Settings.经验教训:在少年司法环境中开展基于家庭的干预研究的挑战与策略
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;58(11):1038-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Mapping social capital: a critical contextual approach for working with low-status families.绘制社会资本图谱:与低社会地位家庭合作的关键情境方法。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2010 Jan;36(1):96-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00186.x.
7
Understanding the Influence of Mental Health Diagnosis and Gender on Placement Decisions for Justice-Involved Youth.了解心理健康诊断和性别对涉司法青少年安置决策的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1562-1581. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0572-5. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
An examination of the influence of procedurally just strategies on legal cynicism among urban youth experiencing police contact.考察程序公正策略对经历警察接触的城市青年法律犬儒主义的影响。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):104-123. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22242. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
9
Telepsychiatry in juvenile justice settings.少年司法中的远程精神病学。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jan;20(1):113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2010.09.001.
10
A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model.理解家庭参与少年司法系统实际影响的研究框架:少年司法家庭参与模式
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):408-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Rethinking Juvenile Recidivism: Towards a More Holistic View of Success.社论:重新思考青少年累犯问题:迈向对成功更全面的看法
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1416703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416703. eCollection 2024.
2
A mixed methods evaluation of family-driven care implementation in juvenile justice agencies in Georgia.对佐治亚州青少年司法机构中家庭驱动式照护实施情况的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00261-0.
3
Caregiver and Juvenile Justice Personnel Perspectives on challenges and importance of caregiver engagement and the potential utility of a peer navigator program in the Juvenile Justice System.照顾者与少年司法人员对照顾者参与的挑战和重要性以及同伴导航计划在少年司法系统中的潜在效用的看法。
Health Justice. 2023 Aug 5;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40352-023-00231-y.
4
Vaccination for Justice-Involved Youth.涉罪青少年的疫苗接种
Pediatrics. 2022 Apr 1;149(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055394.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Incarcerating Young People Affect Their Adult Health Outcomes?监禁年轻人如何影响他们成年后的健康状况?
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2624.
2
The Unequal Consequences of Mass Incarceration for Children.大规模监禁对儿童的不平等后果。
Demography. 2017 Feb;54(1):361-389. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0543-1.
3
Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research.健康科学研究中的定性描述方法
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model.理解家庭参与少年司法系统实际影响的研究框架:少年司法家庭参与模式
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):408-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6.
5
Envisioning the next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions.展望下一代行为健康与刑事司法干预措施。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
6
The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders.监禁对少年犯的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;33(3):448-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
7
A randomized controlled trial of multisystemic therapy and a statutory therapeutic intervention for young offenders.一项针对青少年罪犯的多系统疗法和法定治疗干预的随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;50(12):1220-35.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
8
Disproportionate minority contact.少数族裔接触不均衡。
Future Child. 2008 Fall;18(2):59-79. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0013.
9
The effectiveness of functional family therapy for youth with behavioral problems in a community practice setting.功能家庭疗法对社区实践环境中行为问题青少年的有效性。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):339-48. doi: 10.1037/a0019406.
10
Seven-year life outcomes of adolescent offenders in Los Angeles.洛杉矶青少年罪犯的七年生活结局
Am J Public Health. 2009 May;99(5):863-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.142281. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

家庭与少年司法系统:基于家庭的干预措施考量

Families and the Juvenile Justice System: Considerations for Family-Based Interventions.

作者信息

Amani Bita, Milburn Norweeta G, Lopez Susana, Young-Brinn Angela, Castro Lourdes, Lee Alex, Bath Eraka

机构信息

College of Science and Health (Dr Amani), College of Medicine (Ms Young-Brinn), and College of Science and Health (Ms Castro), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California; and UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute (Dr Bath) and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior (Drs Milburn and Lopez and Mr Lee), University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Fam Community Health. 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):55-63. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000172.

DOI:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000172
PMID:29135795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5726419/
Abstract

We conducted focus groups with defense lawyers, clinicians, and education advocates to gather their perspectives on families' experiences with the juvenile justice system. Our quantitative descriptive analysis identified a range of themes such as discussions about the poor treatment of families as well as recommendations for a shifting of power to families. These perspectives may provide insights about the context in which families are expected to participate in interventions, meet probationary demands, and provide for their youth's well-being. The results support evidence gathered from families about the impact of youth incarceration on their lives and has implications for practitioners and researchers working with families whose youth have been incarcerated.

摘要

我们与辩护律师、临床医生和教育倡导者进行了焦点小组讨论,以收集他们对家庭在少年司法系统中的经历的看法。我们的定量描述性分析确定了一系列主题,例如关于家庭受到恶劣对待的讨论以及将权力转移给家庭的建议。这些观点可能有助于深入了解家庭预计参与干预措施、满足缓刑要求并保障其子女福祉的背景情况。研究结果支持了从家庭收集到的关于青少年监禁对其生活影响的证据,并且对与子女被监禁的家庭打交道的从业者和研究人员具有启示意义。