• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体形成的进化动力学。

Evolutionary dynamics of group formation.

作者信息

Javarone Marco Alberto, Marinazzo Daniele

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.

Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari 09123, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187960. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187960
PMID:29136020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685569/
Abstract

Group formation is a quite ubiquitous phenomenon across different animal species, whose individuals cluster together forming communities of diverse size. Previous investigations suggest that, in general, this phenomenon might have similar underlying reasons across the interested species, despite genetic and behavioral differences. For instance improving the individual safety (e.g. from predators), and increasing the probability to get food resources. Remarkably, the group size might strongly vary from species to species, e.g. shoals of fishes and herds of lions, and sometimes even within the same species, e.g. tribes and families in human societies. Here we build on previous theories stating that the dynamics of group formation may have evolutionary roots, and we explore this fascinating hypothesis from a purely theoretical perspective, with a model using the framework of Evolutionary Game Theory. In our model we hypothesize that homogeneity constitutes a fundamental ingredient in these dynamics. Accordingly, we study a population that tries to form homogeneous groups, i.e. composed of similar agents. The formation of a group can be interpreted as a strategy. Notably, agents can form a group (receiving a 'group payoff'), or can act individually (receiving an 'individual payoff'). The phase diagram of the modeled population shows a sharp transition between the 'group phase' and the 'individual phase', characterized by a critical 'individual payoff'. Our results then support the hypothesis that the phenomenon of group formation has evolutionary roots.

摘要

群体形成是一种在不同动物物种中相当普遍的现象,其个体聚集在一起形成大小各异的群落。先前的研究表明,总体而言,尽管存在遗传和行为差异,但在相关物种中,这种现象可能有相似的潜在原因。例如,提高个体安全性(如躲避捕食者),以及增加获取食物资源的概率。值得注意的是,群体大小可能因物种而异,例如鱼群和狮群,有时甚至在同一物种内也会有所不同,例如人类社会中的部落和家庭。在此,我们基于先前的理论,即群体形成的动态过程可能有进化根源,并且我们从纯理论的角度,使用进化博弈论框架的模型来探索这一引人入胜的假设。在我们的模型中,我们假设同质性是这些动态过程的一个基本要素。相应地,我们研究一个试图形成同质群体的种群,即由相似个体组成的群体。群体的形成可以被解释为一种策略。值得注意的是,个体可以形成群体(获得“群体收益”),或者单独行动(获得“个体收益”)。模拟种群的相图显示了“群体阶段”和“个体阶段”之间的急剧转变,其特征是一个临界的“个体收益”。我们的结果进而支持了群体形成现象有进化根源这一假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/3e1957eae128/pone.0187960.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/b92e88f7a111/pone.0187960.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/ef6cec9d7ca6/pone.0187960.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/e8980f6cd4f7/pone.0187960.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/838ee6520c1b/pone.0187960.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/3e1957eae128/pone.0187960.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/b92e88f7a111/pone.0187960.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/ef6cec9d7ca6/pone.0187960.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/e8980f6cd4f7/pone.0187960.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/838ee6520c1b/pone.0187960.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/497e/5685569/3e1957eae128/pone.0187960.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary dynamics of group formation.群体形成的进化动力学。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187960. eCollection 2017.
2
Evolutionary dynamics of a smoothed war of attrition game.一种平滑消耗战博弈的进化动力学
J Theor Biol. 2016 May 7;396:25-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3
Stochastic sampling of interaction partners versus deterministic payoff assignment.随机抽样的互动伙伴与确定性收益分配。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Apr 21;257(4):689-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.025. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
4
Fixation of competing strategies when interacting agents differ in the time scale of strategy updating.当交互主体在策略更新的时间尺度上存在差异时,对竞争策略进行固定。
Phys Rev E. 2016 Sep;94(3-1):032407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032407. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Strategy selection in evolutionary game dynamics on group interaction networks.群体交互网络上进化博弈动力学中的策略选择
Bull Math Biol. 2014 Nov;76(11):2785-805. doi: 10.1007/s11538-014-0031-y. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
6
Evolutionary game theory as a framework for studying biological invasions.进化博弈论作为研究生物入侵的框架。
Am Nat. 2011 Apr;177(4):410-23. doi: 10.1086/658149.
7
Heterogeneous update mechanisms in evolutionary games: Mixing innovative and imitative dynamics.进化博弈中的异质更新机制:混合创新和模仿动力学。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Apr;97(4-1):042305. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042305.
8
Imitation dynamics with time delay.具有时间延迟的模仿动力学。
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.034. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Evolution via imitation among like-minded individuals.志同道合的个体之间通过模仿实现进化。
J Theor Biol. 2014 May 21;349:100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
Variability in group size and the evolution of collective action.群体规模的变化与集体行动的演变
J Theor Biol. 2016 Jan 21;389:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
How synchronized human networks escape local minima.人类网络如何跳出局部最小值。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 28;15(1):9298. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53540-7.
2
Winner-loser effects improve social network efficiency between competitors with equal resource holding power.优胜劣汰效应提高了资源持有能力相等的竞争者之间的社交网络效率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 2;13(1):14439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41225-y.
3
Super-rational aspiration promotes cooperation in the asymmetric game with peer exit punishment and reward.超理性期望促进了在具有同伴退出惩罚与奖励的非对称博弈中的合作。

本文引用的文献

1
Evolutionary consequences of behavioral diversity.行为多样性的进化后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 8;113(45):E7003-E7009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608990113. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
2
Group size, vocal grooming and the origins of language.群体规模、声音修饰与语言的起源
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):209-212. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1122-6.
3
Pain tolerance predicts human social network size.疼痛耐受性可预测人类社交网络的规模。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):e16729. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16729. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Evolutionary instability of selfish learning in repeated games.重复博弈中自私学习的进化不稳定性
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 27;1(4):pgac141. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac141. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
A game theoretical model for the stimulation of public cooperation in environmental collaborative governance.一个用于促进环境协同治理中公众合作的博弈论模型。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Nov 9;9(11):221148. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221148. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Synchronization of complex human networks.复杂人类网络的同步。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 11;11(1):3854. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17540-7.
7
Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception.进化博弈中的异质性:风险感知分析
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 May;476(2237):20200116. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0116. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
The Beneficial Role of Mobility for the Emergence of Innovation.流动性对创新产生的有益作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 11;7(1):1781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01955-2.
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 28;6:25267. doi: 10.1038/srep25267.
4
Four classes of interactions for evolutionary games.进化博弈的四类相互作用。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Aug;92(2):022820. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.022820. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
5
Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas.在进化社会困境中,从众行为增强了网络互惠性。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Feb 6;12(103). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1299.
6
Intergroup information exchange drives cooperation in the public goods game.群体间的信息交流推动了公共物品博弈中的合作。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Oct;90(4):042808. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042808. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
7
An evolutionary framework for studying mechanisms of social behavior.用于研究社会行为机制的进化框架。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;29(10):581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Collective learning and optimal consensus decisions in social animal groups.群居动物群体中的集体学习与最优共识决策。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 7;10(8):e1003762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003762. eCollection 2014 Aug.
9
Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes.在复杂环境中,决策的准确性通常通过小组规模的缩小来实现。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 23;281(1784):20133305. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3305. Print 2014 Jun 7.
10
Do birds of a feather flock together? The relationship between similarity and altruism in social networks.物以类聚,人以群分?社交网络中的相似性和利他主义的关系。
Hum Nat. 2013 Sep;24(3):336-47. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9174-z.