患者的读写能力与吸烟教育文献的可读性
Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature.
作者信息
Meade C D, Byrd J C
机构信息
School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):204-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.2.204.
Abstract
This study was designed to determine if primary care clinic patients read at a level congruent to the reading grade level of available smoking literature. Reading estimates of smoking education literature (N = 49) ranged from grade 3 to college level (median = 9.5). Reading skills of 258 smoking patients were estimated by reported years of schooling (median = 10), and by scores on the Wide-Range Achievement Test (median = 6). A serious disparity existed between the reading estimates of smoking education literature and the literacy skills of patients in our sample.
摘要
本研究旨在确定初级保健诊所的患者阅读水平是否与现有吸烟文献的阅读年级水平相符。对49份吸烟教育文献的阅读难度估计范围为三年级到大学水平（中位数 = 9.5）。通过报告的受教育年限（中位数 = 10）和广泛成就测试的分数（中位数 = 6）来估计258名吸烟患者的阅读能力。在我们的样本中，吸烟教育文献的阅读难度估计与患者的识字技能之间存在严重差距。
相似文献
1
Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature.患者的读写能力与吸烟教育文献的可读性
Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):204-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.2.204.
2
Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.所选高胆固醇血症患者教育文献的可读性水平。
Heart Lung. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):415-20.
3
4
Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册的阅读难度水平
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;74(6):955-60.
5
Patient education pamphlets about prevention, detection, and treatment of breast cancer for low literacy women.
Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Mar;27(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(95)00834-9.
6
Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature.美国癌症协会患者教育文献的可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):51-5.
7
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性：一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
8
Patient-appropriate health literacy educational materials in ophthalmology.眼科领域适合患者的健康素养教育材料。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;50(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.08.002. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
9
Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials.患者的读写能力与癌症书面教育材料的可读性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Oct;22(9):1345-51.
10
Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册可读性评估。美国妇产科医师学会。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 1):771-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00518-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Health Information on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis From Search Engines and Twitter: Readability Analysis.搜索引擎和 Twitter 上的暴露前预防健康信息：可读性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Sep 4;9:e48630. doi: 10.2196/48630.
2
Harnessing Reddit to Understand the Written-Communication Challenges Experienced by Individuals With Mental Health Disorders: Analysis of Texts From Mental Health Communities.利用Reddit了解精神健康障碍患者所面临的书面沟通挑战：对心理健康社区文本的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 10;20(4):e121. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8219.
3
A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation self-help intervention for dual users of tobacco cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Intervention development and research design.一项针对烟草香烟和电子烟双重使用者的戒烟自助干预随机对照试验：干预措施开发与研究设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
The Readability of Electronic Cigarette Health Information and Advice: A Quantitative Analysis of Web-Based Information.电子烟健康信息与建议的可读性：基于网络信息的定量分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jan 6;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6687.
5
Predictors of the Perception of Smoking Health Risks in Smokers With or Without Schizophrenia.有或无精神分裂症吸烟者对吸烟健康风险认知的预测因素
J Dual Diagn. 2017 Jan-Mar;13(1):29-35. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1260190. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Extended Self-Help for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.戒烟的扩展自助：一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
7
Computer-tailored smoking cessation advice matched to reading ability: Perceptions of participants from the ESCAPE trial.根据阅读能力量身定制的计算机戒烟建议：来自ESCAPE试验参与者的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun 25;98(12):1577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.013.
8
Relapse-Prevention Booklets as an Adjunct to a Tobacco Quitline: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial.作为戒烟热线辅助手段的预防复吸手册：一项随机对照有效性试验
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Mar;18(3):298-305. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv079. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
9
Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material.印刷教育材料评估方法的开发与效度验证
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2007;5(2):89-94. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552007000200007.
10
A randomized clinical trial of self-help intervention for smoking cessation: research design, interventions, and baseline data.一项戒烟自助干预的随机临床试验：研究设计、干预措施及基线数据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 24.
本文引用的文献
1
Psychosocial aspects of changes in cigarette-smoking behavior.吸烟行为改变的社会心理因素
Patient Educ Couns. 1985 Sep;7(3):249-62. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(85)90033-3.
2
Patient comprehension profiles: recent findings and strategies.患者理解概况：近期研究发现与策略
Patient Couns Health Educ. 1980;2(3):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(80)80049-8.
3
Readability of patient education materials.患者教育材料的可读性。
Clin Ther. 1980;3(2):129-36.
4
Self-help books and amount of therapist contact in smoking cessation programs.自助书籍与戒烟项目中治疗师接触的次数
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Oct;49(5):659-67. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.49.5.659.
5
Reading abilities of elderly persons in relation to the difficulty of essential documents.
Gerontologist. 1982 Feb;22(1):36-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/22.1.36.
6
Do patients understand patient-education brochures?
Nurs Health Care. 1982 Jun;3(6):305-10.
7
Comprehension assessment of diabetes education program participants.糖尿病教育项目参与者的理解评估
Diabetes Care. 1984 May-Jun;7(3):232-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.3.232.
8
Why bother with stop-smoking education for lung cancer patients?为什么要为肺癌患者提供戒烟教育呢？
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1984 May-Jun;11(3):30-3.
9
Smoking: health effects and control (1).吸烟：对健康的影响及控制（1）
N Engl J Med. 1985 Aug 22;313(8):491-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198508223130807.
10
Consent forms, readability, and comprehension: the need for new assessment tools.同意书、可读性与理解：对新评估工具的需求
Law Med Health Care. 1985 Apr;13(2):68-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1985.tb00888.x.
Zotero 插件