• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体负荷-速度曲线的可靠性。

The Reliability of Individualized Load-Velocity Profiles.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Jul 1;13(6):763-769. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0610. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0610
PMID:29140148
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the reliability of peak velocity (PV), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean velocity (MV) in the development of load-velocity profiles (LVP) in the full-depth free-weight back squat performed with maximal concentric effort.

METHODS

Eighteen resistance-trained men performed a baseline 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) back-squat trial and 3 subsequent 1-RM trials used for reliability analyses, with 48-h intervals between trials. 1-RM trials comprised lifts from 6 relative loads including 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 90%, and 100% 1-RM. Individualized LVPs for PV, MPV, or MV were derived from loads that were highly reliable based on the following criteria: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >.70, coefficient of variation (CV) ≤10%, and Cohen d effect size (ES) <0.60.

RESULTS

PV was highly reliable at all 6 loads. MPV and MV were highly reliable at 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 90% but not 100% 1-RM (MPV: ICC = .66, CV = 18.0%, ES = 0.10, SEM = 0.04 m·s; MV: ICC = .55, CV = 19.4%, ES = 0.08, SEM = 0.04 m·s). When considering the reliable ranges, almost perfect correlations were observed for LVPs derived from PV (r = .91-.93), MPV (r = .92-.94), and MV (r = .94-.95). Furthermore, the LVPs were not significantly different (P > .05) between trials or movement velocities or between linear regression versus 2nd-order polynomial fits.

CONCLUSIONS

PV, MPV, and MV are reliable and can be utilized to develop LVPs using linear regression. Conceptually, LVPs can be used to monitor changes in movement velocity and employed as a method for adjusting sessional training loads according to daily readiness.

摘要

目的

研究在使用最大向心力量进行全深度自由重量深蹲时,峰值速度(PV)、平均推进速度(MPV)和平均速度(MV)在负荷-速度曲线(LVP)发展中的可靠性。

方法

18 名受过抗阻训练的男性进行了基线 1 次重复最大(1-RM)深蹲试验和随后的 3 次 1-RM 试验,用于可靠性分析,试验之间间隔 48 小时。1-RM 试验包括从 6 个相对负荷中进行举重,包括 20%、40%、60%、80%、90%和 100%的 1-RM。根据以下标准,从高度可靠的负荷中得出个体 LVP 用于 PV、MPV 或 MV:组内相关系数(ICC)>.70、变异系数(CV)≤10%,和 Cohen d 效应量(ES)<.60。

结果

在所有 6 个负荷中,PV 具有高度可靠性。在 20%、40%、60%、80%和 90%时,MPV 和 MV 具有高度可靠性,但在 100% 1-RM 时不具有高度可靠性(MPV:ICC=.66、CV=18.0%、ES=0.10、SEM=0.04 m·s;MV:ICC=.55、CV=19.4%、ES=0.08、SEM=0.04 m·s)。当考虑可靠范围时,PV(r=.91-.93)、MPV(r=.92-.94)和 MV(r=.94-.95)得出的 LVP 几乎呈现出完美的相关性。此外,试验之间、运动速度之间或线性回归与二阶多项式拟合之间的 LVP 没有显著差异(P>.05)。

结论

PV、MPV 和 MV 是可靠的,可以用于使用线性回归来开发 LVP。从概念上讲,LVP 可用于监测运动速度的变化,并作为根据日常准备情况调整会议训练负荷的方法。

相似文献

1
The Reliability of Individualized Load-Velocity Profiles.个体负荷-速度曲线的可靠性。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Jul 1;13(6):763-769. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0610. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Pooled Versus Individualized Load-Velocity Profiling in the Free-Weight Back Squat and Power Clean.自由重量深蹲和力量挺中集中与个体化负荷-速度剖面比较。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):825-833. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0534. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Mean Velocity vs. Mean Propulsive Velocity vs. Peak Velocity: Which Variable Determines Bench Press Relative Load With Higher Reliability?平均速度与平均推进速度与峰值速度:哪个变量能更可靠地确定卧推的相对负荷?
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1273-1279. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001998.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Load-Velocity Relationship to Predict the 1RM Back Squat.用于预测1RM后深蹲的负荷-速度关系的可靠性和有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1897-1904. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001657.
5
Validity and Reliability of Using Load-Velocity Relationship Profiles to Establish Back Squat 1 m·s-1 Load.使用负荷-速度关系曲线来建立背蹲 1 米/秒负荷的有效性和可靠性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(2):340-346. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003871.
6
Analysis of the Load-Velocity Relationship in Deadlift Exercise.硬拉运动中负荷-速度关系的分析。
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Aug 13;19(3):452-459. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of a Commercial Linear Position Transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to Measure Velocity and Power in the Back Squat and Bench Press.商用直线位置传感器(GymAware PowerTool)测量深蹲和卧推中速度和力量的重测信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Mar;34(3):728-737. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002715.
8
Validity and Reliability of the PUSH Wearable Device to Measure Movement Velocity During the Back Squat Exercise.PUSH可穿戴设备在深蹲运动中测量运动速度的有效性和可靠性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jul;30(7):1968-74. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001284.
9
Validity of Various Methods for Determining Velocity, Force, and Power in the Back Squat.各种方法在深蹲中确定速度、力量和功率的有效性。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Oct;12(9):1170-1176. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0627. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models.评估自由重量俯姿卧推练习中的负荷-速度曲线,使用不同的速度变量和回归模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212085. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Mechanical Output between One Repetition Maximum- and Body Mass-Based Load Determination in The Behind-Neck Push Jerk.颈后推挺中基于一次重复最大值和体重的负荷确定方法在机械输出上的差异
J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):626-633. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.626. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
A systematic review using a multi-layered criteria framework for assessing the validity and reliability of velocity monitoring devices in resistance training.一项使用多层标准框架评估阻力训练中速度监测设备有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0324606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324606. eCollection 2025.
3
Optimization of applied loads for assessing load-velocity relationship during back squat.
评估后深蹲过程中负荷-速度关系时施加负荷的优化
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328772. eCollection 2025.
4
An investigation of the load-velocity relationship between flywheel eccentric and barbell training methods.飞轮偏心训练法与杠铃训练法之间负荷-速度关系的研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1579291. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579291. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluating the Field 2-Point Method for the Relative Load-Velocity Relationship Monitoring in Free-Weight Back Squats.评估自由重量深蹲中相对负荷-速度关系监测的现场两点法
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Dec 19;97:183-195. doi: 10.5114/jhk/193975. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Effects of Transducer Placement on Load-Velocity Relationships in Smith Machine and Free Weight Squats in Trained Women.传感器放置对训练有素的女性在史密斯机和自由重量深蹲中负荷-速度关系的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 May 15;10(2):178. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020178.
7
Can the velocity profile in the bench press and the bench pull sufficiently estimate the one repetition maximum in youth elite cross-country ski and biathlon athletes?卧推和卧拉中的速度曲线能否充分估计青年优秀越野滑雪和冬季两项运动员的一次重复最大值?
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 28;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01137-y.
8
Conceptualizing a load and volume autoregulation integrated velocity model to minimize neuromuscular fatigue and maximize neuromuscular adaptations in resistance training.构建一个负荷与容量自动调节综合速度模型,以在阻力训练中最小化神经肌肉疲劳并最大化神经肌肉适应性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 May;125(5):1221-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05709-1. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
9
Validity and reliability of velocity and power measures provided by the Vitruve linear position transducer.维特鲁威线性位置传感器提供的速度和功率测量的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312348. eCollection 2024.
10
Effectiveness of an Individualized Training Based on Dynamic Strength Index on Sprinting, Jumping and Change of Direction Performance in Basketball Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于动态力量指数的个体化训练对篮球运动员短跑、跳跃和变向能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Sep 1;23(1):504-514. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.504. eCollection 2024 Sep.