• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

备受争议的农学:加纳的公众话语与生物技术政策的未来

Debated agronomy: public discourse and the future of biotechnology policy in Ghana.

作者信息

Braimah Joseph A, Atuoye Kilian N, Vercillo Siera, Warring Carrie, Luginaah Isaac

机构信息

Environmental Health and Hazards Lab, Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Glob Bioeth. 2017 Feb 22;28(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2016.1261604. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/11287462.2016.1261604
PMID:29147107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5678443/
Abstract

This paper examines the highly contested and ongoing biotechnology (Bt) policy-making process in Ghana. We analyse media content on how Bt is viewed in the context of Ghana's parliamentary debate on the Plant Breeders Bill and within the broader public policy-making literature. This paper does not seek to take a position on Bt or the Bill, but to understand how policy actors influence the debate with political and scientific rhetoric in Ghana. The study reveals that in the midst of scientific uncertainties of Bt's potential for sustainable agriculture production and food security, policy decisions that encourage its future adoption are heavily influenced by health, scientific, economic, environmental and political factors dictated by different ideologies, values and norms. While locally pioneered plant breeding is visible and common in the Ghanaian food chain, plant breeding/GMOs/Bt from international corporations is strongly resisted by anti-GMO coalitions. Understanding the complex and messy nature of Bt policy-making is critical for future development of agricultural technology in Ghana and elsewhere.

摘要

本文审视了加纳备受争议且仍在进行中的生物技术(Bt)政策制定过程。我们分析了媒体内容,内容涉及在加纳议会关于《植物育种者法案》的辩论背景下以及更广泛的公共政策制定文献中,人们对Bt的看法。本文并非试图对Bt或该法案表明立场,而是要了解政策行为者如何利用政治和科学言辞在加纳影响这场辩论。研究表明,在Bt对可持续农业生产和粮食安全的潜力存在科学不确定性的情况下,鼓励未来采用Bt的政策决策受到不同意识形态、价值观和规范所决定的健康、科学、经济、环境和政治因素的严重影响。虽然本地首创的植物育种在加纳食物链中很常见,但国际公司的植物育种/转基因生物/Bt遭到了反转基因联盟的强烈抵制。理解Bt政策制定的复杂和混乱本质对于加纳及其他地区未来农业技术的发展至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec44/5678443/5a51baea070b/RGBE_A_1261604_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec44/5678443/5a51baea070b/RGBE_A_1261604_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec44/5678443/5a51baea070b/RGBE_A_1261604_F0001_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Debated agronomy: public discourse and the future of biotechnology policy in Ghana.备受争议的农学:加纳的公众话语与生物技术政策的未来
Glob Bioeth. 2017 Feb 22;28(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2016.1261604. eCollection 2017.
2
Complex mediascapes, complex realities: critically engaging with biotechnology debates in Ghana.复杂的媒介景观,复杂的现实:批判性地参与加纳的生物技术辩论
Glob Bioeth. 2018 May 31;29(1):55-64. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2018.1480253. eCollection 2018.
3
The evolution of media reportage on GMOs in Ghana following approval of first GM crop.加纳首例转基因作物获批后媒体对转基因生物报道的演变
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):16-27. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2365481. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Financial sustainability versus access and quality in a challenged health system: an examination of the capitation policy debate in Ghana.面临挑战的卫生系统中的财务可持续性与可及性和质量:对加纳人头税政策辩论的审视
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1240-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw058. Epub 2016 May 13.
5
Policy initiation and political levers in health policy: lessons from Ghana's health insurance.政策制定与卫生政策中的政治杠杆:加纳医疗保险的经验教训
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S10. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
6
Gene editing achieves consistently higher favorability in social and traditional media than GMOs.基因编辑在社会和传统媒体中的认可度始终高于转基因生物。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2226889. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.知识的混合模式?转基因生物辩论背景下构建科学证据面临的挑战。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2009 Jul;16(5):508-20. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0164-y. Epub 2009 May 20.
8
Stakeholders Perspectives on the Success Drivers in Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme - Identifying Policy Translation Issues.利益相关者视角下的加纳国家健康保险计划成功驱动因素——识别政策转化问题。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):273-283. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.133.
9
Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths.理性化转基因生物辩论:解决农业神话的奥尔多诺米方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 9;13(5):476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050476.
10
The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.宗教领袖、环保人士及科学政策制定者对生物技术的态度。
Recomb DNA Tech Bull. 1985 Dec;8(4):141-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex mediascapes, complex realities: critically engaging with biotechnology debates in Ghana.复杂的媒介景观,复杂的现实:批判性地参与加纳的生物技术辩论
Glob Bioeth. 2018 May 31;29(1):55-64. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2018.1480253. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.食品安全:养活 90 亿人的挑战。
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
2
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bt)转基因作物:一种环境友好型害虫治理策略。
J Environ Biol. 2008 Sep;29(5):641-53.
3
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
4
Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.制造公众疏离感:转基因生物风险与伦理的专家文化
Sci Cult (Lond). 2001 Dec;10(4):445-81. doi: 10.1080/09505430120093586.
5
How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?如何使转基因食品被公众接受?
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;22(3):107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.01.007.
6
Global food security: challenges and policies.全球粮食安全:挑战与政策
Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1917-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1092958.
7
Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.Bt转基因植物部署的经济、生态、食品安全及社会后果。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:845-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309.
8
Genetically modified plants - the debate continues.转基因植物——争论仍在继续。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01751-6.
9
A socio-ecological approach to understanding barriers to prenatal care for women of low income.一种社会生态方法,用于理解低收入女性产前护理的障碍。
J Adv Nurs. 1999 May;29(5):1170-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00986.x.