Suppr超能文献

要喝还是要少喝?区分实施意向对有酒精使用障碍的治疗寻求者的饮酒决策和饮酒量的影响。

To drink or to drink less? Distinguishing between effects of implementation intentions on decisions to drink and how much to drink in treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA; Virginia Tech, Department of Psychology, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA; Virginia Tech, Department of Statistics, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;83:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For many people with alcohol use disorders, alcohol drinking is a highly ingrained and automatized behavior with negative long-term health consequences. Implementation intentions, a behavioral intervention that links high-risk drinking situations with alternative, healthier responses, provide a means to intervene on habitual drinking behaviors. Here, a pilot treatment using implementation intentions was assessed with remote assessments and treatment prompts.

METHODS

Treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorder between the ages of 18 and 65 were recruited from the community from October 2014 to November 2016. Participants (N=35) were quasi-randomly assigned to complete either active (n=18) or control (n=17) two-week implementation intention interventions. Active implementation intentions linked high-risk situations with alternative responses whereas the control condition selected situations and responses but did not link these together. Daily ecological momentary interventions of participant-tailored implementation intentions were delivered via text message. Alcohol consumption was assessed once daily with self-reported ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) of drinks consumed the previous day and thrice daily remotely submitted breathalyzer samples to assess reliability of self-reports.

RESULTS

On drinking days (80% of days), the active implementation intentions group reduced alcohol consumption during the intervention period compared to the control condition; however the difference between consumption was not observed at one-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The implementation intention intervention was associated with a 1.09 drink per day decrease in alcohol consumption on drinking days compared to a decrease of 0.29 drinks per day in the control condition. Future studies may combine implementation intentions with other treatments to help individuals to reduce alcohol consumption.

摘要

简介

对于许多患有酒精使用障碍的人来说,饮酒是一种根深蒂固且自动化的行为,会带来长期的负面健康后果。实施意图是一种行为干预措施,它将高风险饮酒情境与替代的、更健康的反应联系起来,为干预习惯性饮酒行为提供了一种手段。在这里,使用实施意图的试点治疗通过远程评估和治疗提示进行了评估。

方法

2014 年 10 月至 2016 年 11 月,从社区招募了年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间的寻求治疗的酒精使用障碍患者。参与者(n=35)被随机分为主动(n=18)或控制(n=17)两组,完成为期两周的实施意图干预。主动实施意图将高风险情境与替代反应联系起来,而控制条件则选择情境和反应,但不将这些联系起来。通过短信向参与者提供每日生态瞬间干预的个性化实施意图。通过前一天饮酒量的自我报告生态瞬间评估(EMA)和每日三次远程提交的呼气酒精测试样本来评估自我报告的可靠性,对饮酒量进行评估。

结果

在饮酒日(80%的日子),与控制条件相比,主动实施意图组在干预期间减少了饮酒量;然而,在一个月的随访中没有观察到这种差异。

讨论

与控制条件相比,实施意图干预使饮酒日的酒精摄入量减少了 1.09 杯/天,而控制条件的摄入量减少了 0.29 杯/天。未来的研究可能会将实施意图与其他治疗方法相结合,以帮助个人减少饮酒量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Ecological momentary interventions for mental health: A scoping review.生态瞬间干预心理健康:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248152. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验