• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一氧化碳探测器干预措施在两个场所的分布与评估:急诊科和城市社区

Distribution and Evaluation of a Carbon Monoxide Detector Intervention in Two Settings: Emergency Department and Urban Community.

作者信息

McKenzie Lara B, Roberts Kristin J, Shields Wendy C, McDonald Eileen, Omaki Elise, Abdel-Rasoul Mahmoud, Gielen Andrea C

出版信息

J Environ Health. 2017 May;79(9):24-30.

PMID:29154522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5726559/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe changes in carbon monoxide (CO) safety knowledge and observed CO detector use following distribution of a CO detector use intervention in two environments, a pediatric emergency department (Ohio) and an urban community (Maryland). A total of 301 participants completed the 6-month follow up (Ohio: n = 125; Maryland: n = 176). The majority of participants was female, 25–34 years of age, and employed (full or part time). We found that CO safety knowledge did not differ between settings at enrollment, but significantly improved at the follow-up visits. The majority of CO detectors observed were functional and installed in the correct location. Of those with CO detectors at follow up, the majority had not replaced the battery. The success of the intervention varied between settings and distribution methods. The majority of participants showed improved knowledge and behaviors. Improved device technology may be needed to eliminate the need for battery replacement.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述在两个环境(俄亥俄州的一家儿科急诊科和马里兰州的一个城市社区)中分发一氧化碳(CO)探测器使用干预措施后,一氧化碳安全知识的变化情况以及观察到的CO探测器使用情况。共有301名参与者完成了6个月的随访(俄亥俄州:n = 125;马里兰州:n = 176)。大多数参与者为女性,年龄在25 - 34岁之间,且有工作(全职或兼职)。我们发现,在入组时不同环境之间的CO安全知识并无差异,但在随访时显著提高。观察到的大多数CO探测器功能正常且安装在正确位置。在随访时有CO探测器的参与者中,大多数没有更换电池。干预措施的成功程度因环境和分发方式而异。大多数参与者的知识和行为有所改善。可能需要改进设备技术以消除更换电池的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8286/5726559/e9e05eb35c6c/nihms910899f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8286/5726559/e9e05eb35c6c/nihms910899f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8286/5726559/e9e05eb35c6c/nihms910899f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Distribution and Evaluation of a Carbon Monoxide Detector Intervention in Two Settings: Emergency Department and Urban Community.一氧化碳探测器干预措施在两个场所的分布与评估:急诊科和城市社区
J Environ Health. 2017 May;79(9):24-30.
2
A survey of residential carbon monoxide detector utilization among Connecticut Emergency Department patients.康涅狄格州急诊科患者住宅一氧化碳探测器使用情况调查。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Jun;50(5):384-9. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2012.683576.
3
Paediatric emergency department-based carbon monoxide detector intervention: a randomised trial.基于儿科急诊的一氧化碳探测器干预:一项随机试验。
Inj Prev. 2017 Oct;23(5):314-320. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042039. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
An evaluation of a carbon monoxide poisoning education program.一氧化碳中毒教育项目评估
Health Promot Pract. 2010 May;11(3):320-4. doi: 10.1177/1524839908327732. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
5
Residential carbon monoxide detector failure rates in the United States.美国住宅用一氧化碳探测器的故障率。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):e15-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300274. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
6
Residential carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning risks: correlates of observed CO alarm use in urban households.住宅一氧化碳(CO)中毒风险:城市家庭中一氧化碳报警器使用情况的相关因素
J Environ Health. 2013 Oct;76(3):26-32.
7
Carbon monoxide detector effectiveness in reducing poisoning, Wisconsin 2014-2016.一氧化碳探测器在减少中毒方面的效果,威斯康星州 2014-2016 年。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020 Dec;58(12):1335-1341. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1733592. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Emergency department management of suspected carbon monoxide poisoning: role of pulse CO-oximetry.急诊疑似一氧化碳中毒的管理:脉搏 CO-血氧仪的作用。
Respir Care. 2013 Oct;58(10):1614-20. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02313. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
For Submission to the Journal of Community Health: Carbon Monoxide Awareness and Detector Use in the State of Wisconsin.提交给《社区健康杂志》:威斯康星州的一氧化碳意识和探测器使用情况。
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01235-3. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
Routine carbon monoxide screening by emergency medical technicians.急救医疗技术人员进行常规一氧化碳筛查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;8(3):288-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01309.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Global patterns and trends of carbon monoxide poisoning: A comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis using joinpoint regression and ARIMA modeling, 1990-2021.一氧化碳中毒的全球模式与趋势:1990 - 2021年使用连接点回归和自回归积分移动平均模型的综合时空分析
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0330778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330778. eCollection 2025.
2
A Call to Action: Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Childhood Unintentional Injury Risk.行动呼吁:解决儿童意外伤害风险中的社会经济差异问题。
Pediatrics. 2024 Apr 1;153(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063445.
3
Development and Evaluation of a Theory-Based Approach to Reducing Carbon Monoxide (CO) Morbidity and Mortality: The CO Blitz Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Residential carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning risks: correlates of observed CO alarm use in urban households.住宅一氧化碳(CO)中毒风险:城市家庭中一氧化碳报警器使用情况的相关因素
J Environ Health. 2013 Oct;76(3):26-32.
2
Network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of smoke alarms.网络荟萃分析评估提高烟雾报警器使用率的干预措施的有效性。
Epidemiol Rev. 2012;34:32-45. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr015. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
3
Hospital burden of unintentional carbon monoxide poisoning in the United States, 2007.
基于理论的降低一氧化碳(CO)发病率和死亡率方法的开发与评估:CO闪电战模型
J Community Health Nurs. 2019 Jul-Sep;36(3):115-123. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2019.1630967.
2007 年美国非故意一氧化碳中毒的医院负担。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):657-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 May 12.
4
Nonfatal, unintentional, non--fire-related carbon monoxide exposures--United States, 2004-2006.2004 - 2006年美国非致命、意外、与火灾无关的一氧化碳暴露情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Aug 22;57(33):896-9.
5
Carbon monoxide: the case for environmental public health surveillance.一氧化碳:环境公共卫生监测的实例
Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):138-44. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200202.
6
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention.居家安全教育及提供预防伤害的安全设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD005014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub2.
7
Risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning in U.S. households.美国家庭火灾、烧伤和一氧化碳中毒的风险及保护因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jan;28(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.014.
8
Strategies to increase smoke alarm use in high-risk households.提高高危家庭烟雾报警器使用率的策略。
J Community Health. 2004 Oct;29(5):375-85. doi: 10.1023/b:johe.0000038653.59255.57.
9
Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function.促进烟雾报警器拥有率和功能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD002246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002246.
10
Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms.促进烟雾报警器使用的干预措施对照试验的系统评价
Arch Dis Child. 2000 May;82(5):341-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.5.341.