Kurpad Shekar, Martin Allan R, Tetreault Lindsay A, Fischer Dena J, Skelly Andrea C, Mikulis David, Flanders Adam, Aarabi Bizhan, Mroz Thomas E, Tsai Eve C, Fehlings Michael G
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):151S-174S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217703666. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Systematic review.
To perform a systematic review to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI).
An electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for literature published through May 12, 2015, to answer key questions associated with the use of MRI in patients with acute SCI.
The literature search yielded 796 potentially relevant citations, 8 of which were included in this review. One study used MRI in a protocol to decide on early surgical decompression. The MRI-protocol group showed improved outcomes; however, the quality of evidence was deemed very low due to selection bias. Seven studies reported MRI predictors of neurologic or functional outcomes. There was moderate-quality evidence that longer intramedullary hemorrhage (2 studies) and low-quality evidence that smaller spinal canal diameter at the location of maximal spinal cord compression and the presence of cord swelling are associated with poor neurologic recovery. There was moderate-quality evidence that clinical outcomes are not predicted by SCI lesion length and the presence of cord edema.
Certain MRI characteristics appear to be predictive of outcomes in acute SCI, including length of intramedullary hemorrhage (moderate-quality evidence), canal diameter at maximal spinal cord compression (low-quality evidence), and spinal cord swelling (low-quality evidence). Other imaging features were either inconsistently (presence of hemorrhage, maximal canal compromise, and edema length) or not associated with outcomes. The paucity of literature highlights the need for well-designed prospective studies.
系统评价。
进行系统评价以评估磁共振成像(MRI)在急性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中的应用价值。
对Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane协作图书馆和谷歌学术进行电子检索,查找截至2015年5月12日发表的文献,以回答与急性SCI患者使用MRI相关的关键问题。
文献检索得到796条潜在相关引文,其中8条纳入本评价。一项研究在方案中使用MRI来决定早期手术减压。MRI方案组显示出更好的结果;然而,由于选择偏倚,证据质量被认为非常低。七项研究报告了MRI对神经或功能结局的预测指标。有中等质量的证据表明较长的脊髓内出血(2项研究)以及低质量的证据表明脊髓最大受压部位较小的椎管直径和脊髓肿胀与神经功能恢复不良有关。有中等质量的证据表明,SCI损伤长度和脊髓水肿的存在不能预测临床结局。
某些MRI特征似乎可预测急性SCI的结局,包括脊髓内出血长度(中等质量证据)、脊髓最大受压处的椎管直径(低质量证据)和脊髓肿胀(低质量证据)。其他影像学特征要么与结局不一致(出血的存在、最大椎管狭窄和水肿长度),要么与结局无关。文献的匮乏凸显了开展精心设计的前瞻性研究的必要性。