Li Jian, Riedel Natalie, Barrech Amira, Herr Raphael M, Aust Birgit, Mörtl Kathrin, Siegrist Johannes, Gündel Harald, Angerer Peter
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2853813. doi: 10.1155/2017/2853813. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
Short- and medium-term effectiveness (up to 3 years) of individual level stress management interventions (SMI) at work were demonstrated, yet long-term effectiveness remains unexplored. We therefore aimed to address this research gap.
94 male middle managers participated in a randomized wait-list controlled trial between 2006 and 2008 and in a post-trial-follow-up survey in 2015. During the first two years, all received an 18-hour psychotherapeutic SMI intervention which was based on the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model: tackling stressor on mismatch between effort and reward and promoting recovery on overcommitment. Work stress (i.e., ERI indicators) was the primary outcome, and the secondary outcome was depressive symptoms. The long-term effectiveness of the SMI was examined by mixed modeling, using an external control group ( = 94).
Effort and reward were substantially improved with significant intervention ⁎ time interaction effects ( < 0.001) compared to the external control group; effects on overcommitment and depressive symptoms were also significant ( < 0.05 and < 0.01, resp.), though their trajectories in the intervention group were less sustainable.
The effectiveness of this psychotherapeutic SMI at work based on the ERI model was observed over a 9-year period, particularly on the effort-reward ratio.
已证实工作场所个体层面压力管理干预措施(SMI)的短期和中期有效性(长达3年),但其长期有效性仍未得到探索。因此,我们旨在填补这一研究空白。
94名男性中层管理人员在2006年至2008年期间参与了一项随机等待列表对照试验,并于2015年参与了试验后随访调查。在最初两年中,所有人都接受了一项基于努力-回报失衡(ERI)模型的18小时心理治疗性SMI干预:解决努力与回报不匹配的压力源,并促进过度投入方面的恢复。工作压力(即ERI指标)是主要结局,次要结局是抑郁症状。通过混合模型,使用外部对照组(n = 94)来检验SMI的长期有效性。
与外部对照组相比,干预×时间交互效应显著(P < 0.001),努力和回报得到了显著改善;对过度投入和抑郁症状的影响也很显著(分别为P < 0.05和P < 0.01),尽管干预组中它们的轨迹可持续性较差。
在9年的时间里观察到了这种基于ERI模型的工作场所心理治疗性SMI的有效性,特别是在努力-回报比方面。