Bernhisel-Broadbent J, Sampson H A
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Feb;83(2 Pt 1):435-40. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90130-9.
Sixty-nine patients with one or more positive prick skin tests to legumes (peanut, soybean, green bean, pea, and lima bean) were evaluated for food hypersensitivity with in-hospital oral food challenges. Of the 280 prick skin tests to legumes performed, 130 were positive. Forty-three positive food challenges occurred in 41 patients. The prevalence of legume allergy was not statistically different in those patients (N = 36) with two or more positive legume prick skin test (64% positive) compared to those patients (N = 33) with only one positive legume prick skin test (55% positive; p greater than 0.10). Even in this selected patient population, only two patients had symptomatic hypersensitivity to two legumes. Among patients with a positive prick skin test to peanut (N = 60), the mean wheal size was larger in patients with a positive versus a negative oral food challenge to peanut (p less than 0.001). Results of oral food challenges demonstrate that clinically important cross-reactivity to legumes in children is very rare. Clinical hypersensitivity to one legume does not warrant dietary elimination of all legumes. Results of prick skin tests should not be used to determine prolonged food restriction diets.
对豆类(花生、大豆、绿豆、豌豆和利马豆)进行的一次或多次皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的69例患者,通过住院口服食物激发试验评估食物过敏情况。在进行的280次豆类皮肤点刺试验中,130次呈阳性。41例患者出现了43次阳性食物激发试验结果。与仅有一次豆类皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的患者(N = 33,阳性率55%)相比,两次或更多次豆类皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的患者(N = 36,阳性率64%)中豆类过敏的患病率无统计学差异(p大于0.10)。即使在这个特定的患者群体中,也仅有两名患者对两种豆类有症状性过敏反应。在花生皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的患者(N = 60)中,花生口服食物激发试验呈阳性的患者风团平均大小大于阴性患者(p小于0.001)。口服食物激发试验结果表明,儿童中对豆类具有临床重要性的交叉反应非常罕见。对一种豆类的临床过敏反应并不意味着需要从饮食中排除所有豆类。皮肤点刺试验结果不应被用于确定长期的食物限制饮食。